Skip to main content

Beyond Restoration: Planting Coastal Infrastructure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change Adaptation in North America

Part of the book series: Climate Change Management ((CCM))

Abstract

The following research project proposes a model whereby the biological arrangement of plants in space and over time can lead to a new paradigm using the modification of coastal ecologies, to move beyond restoration, ultimately dissolving the limiting dichotomy between green and grey infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I borrow the term nostalgia from Svetlana Boym in The Future of Nostalgia, where she differentiates between nostalgia as a state-building initiative as opposed to a personal project. With this in mind, I propose that restoration is used nostalgically as means to restore the greatness of former ecologies, rather than focus on its transitions or the negative impact of human influence, sanctioning the funds for a construction project rather than initiating a change in behavior: “What is crucial is that nostalgia was not merely an expression of local longing, but a result of a new understanding of time and space that made the division into “local” and “universal” possible. The nostalgic creature has internalized this division, but instead of aspiring for the universal and the progressive he looks backward and yearns for the particular.

  2. 2.

    Ongoing conversations with director of restoration at ‘Save the Bay,’ Wenley Ferguson, reinforce this local frustration. See also SAMP reports such as: http://www.beachsamp.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Rhode-Island-Sea-Level-Affecting-Marshes-Model-Technical-Report-11.pdf (accessed March 12, 2016).

  3. 3.

    The Bay extends approximately 45 km along this north-south axis, reaches 18 km at its widest point, and covers an area of 342 km2. For more details on Bay dynamics: http://www.savebay.org/bayfacts.

  4. 4.

    With particular appreciation to Wenley Ferguson (Ecologist, Save the Bay) and Janet Friedman (Coastal geologist), at CRMC for leading numerous site visits.

  5. 5.

    In the case of Rhode Island, that scale of subsidence would result in a significant area of land loss, up to 20% of its total land area.

  6. 6.

    http://www.crmc.ri.gov.

  7. 7.

    This speculation is based on conversations between the author, Dr. Del Tredici and Grover Fugate at a meeting in June 2014 at ‘Save the Bay,’ Providence, Rhode Island.

  8. 8.

    W. Skeat in A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language first defined the term. (Oxford: Claredon 1882) The origin is traced by the Latin root resilire, which translates to ‘leap back’. Subsequent to this, it is defined by The Oxford Advanced Dictionary (2016) as the “ability (of a person or animal) to withstand or recover quickly from difficult conditions.” A clear modification from its original application and principle etymology.

  9. 9.

    See Purdy, J. After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene. Cambridge: Harvard, 2015 (11).

  10. 10.

    Plant lists developed in collaboration with Dr. Peter Del Tredici (see appendix).

References

  • Adger WN, Brown K, Nelson DR, Berkes F, Eakin H, Folke C, Galvin K, Gunderson L, Goulden M, O’Brien K, Ruitenbeek J, Tompkins EL (2011) Wiley Interdisc Rev: Climate Change 2(5):757–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett O (2001) Cultural pessimism: narratives of decline in the postmodern world. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson MH, Craig RK (2014) The end of sustainability. Soc Nat Res: Int J 27(7):777–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg M (2013) A stronger, more resilient New York. City of New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Gary P Kofinas, and Carl Folke (2009) A framework for understanding change. In: Chapin FS III, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) Principles of ecosystem Stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, New York, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Tredici P (1999) Aging and rejuvenation in trees. Arnoldia. Winter:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Tredici P (2001) Sprouting in temperate trees: a morphological and ecological review. Bot Rev 67(2):121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel KA (2005) Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature 436:686–688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel KA (2008) The hurricane-climate connection. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend R, Moench M (2013) What is the purpose of urban climate resilience? Implications for addressing poverty and vulnerability. Urban Climate 6:98–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH (2000) Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Ann Rev Ecol, Evol, Syst 31:425–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Allen CR, Holling CS (2010) The evolution of an idea—the past, present, and future of ecological resilience. In Gunderson LH, Allen CR, Holling CS (eds) Foundations of ecological resilience, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilderbrand RH, Watts AC, Randle AM (2005) The myths of restoration ecology. Ecol Soc 10(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1986) Resilience of ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE (eds) Sustainable development and the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 292–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4(5):390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2009) The four cornerstones of resilience engineering. In Nemeth Christopher P, Hollnagel E, Dekker S (eds) Resilience engineering perspectives: preparation and restoration. Ashgate, Farnham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Károly K (2011) Rise and fall of the concept sustainability. J Environ Sustain 1(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAslan A (2010) The concept of resilience: understanding its origins, meaning and utility. Torrens Resilience Institute, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy J (2015) After nature: a politics for the anthropocene. Harvard, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was originally developed as part of SCR: Structures of Coastal Resilience, with support from the Rockefeller Foundation. With particular thanks to Michael J. Luegering for his collaboration. For team assembly, consultants and more information, see: Structures of Coastal Resilience: www.structuresofcoastalresilience.org.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosetta S. Elkin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elkin, R.S. (2017). Beyond Restoration: Planting Coastal Infrastructure. In: Leal Filho, W., Keenan, J. (eds) Climate Change Adaptation in North America. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53742-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics