Skip to main content

The Representation of Computation in Physical Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
EPSA15 Selected Papers

Part of the book series: European Studies in Philosophy of Science ((ESPS,volume 5))

Abstract

The language of computing to describe physical processes has become popular in a number of scientific fields. However, without a clear definition of computing outside very narrow domains, such usage fails to add content to our understanding of physical reality. In this paper I explore how the theory of these specific engineered devices can possibly help us understand fundamental science, by close consideration of the connection between abstract computational theory and physical computing devices. Using the recently developed formalism of Abstraction/Representation Theory, I show what it means for a physical system to be acting as a computer, and give the conditions for a system to be capable of supporting a computational representation. A computational representation gives nontrivial information about the underlying physical system; but not every system under every physical theory is necessarily capable of supporting such a representation. In the cases where it is possible to represent a system computationally, this then becomes a new language and logic in which to describe, understand, and investigate the fundamental processes of physical reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrow, John D. 1991. Theories of everything: The quest for ultimate explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, David J. 1996. Does a rock implement every finite-state automaton? Synthese 108(3): 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. Jack. 1996. What is computation? Synthese 108(3): 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B.J. 2004. The essential turing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, Richard. 1982. Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21: 467–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frigg, Roman. 2006. Scientific representation and the semantic view of theories. Theoria 55: 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, David Alan. 2007. When computers were human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsman, Dominic. 2015. Abstraction/representation theory for heterotic physical computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373(2046).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsman, Clare, Susan Stepney, Rob Wagner, and Viv Kendon. 2014. When does a physical system compute? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 470(20140182).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsman, Dominic, Viv Kendon, Susan Stepney, and Peter Young. 2016. Abstraction and representation in living organisms: When does a biological system compute? In Representation and reality: Humans, animals, and machines, ed. G. Dodig-Crnkovic and R. Giovagnoli. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, Rolf. 1991. Information is physical. Physics Today 44(5): 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Seth. 2004. Programming the universe. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace, Ada. 1843. Notes on ‘sketch of the Analytical Engine invented by Charles Babbage’. In Scientific memoirs 3, ed. Richard Taylor and John E. Taylor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, Roger. 1989. The emperor’s new mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E. 1941. Mathematical theory of the differential analyzer. Journal of Mathematics and Physics MIT 20: 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swade, Doron. 2002. The difference engine. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A.M. 1937. On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s2-42(1): 230–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, Bas C. 2008. Scientific representation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vedral, Vlatko. 2012. Decoding the universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergis, A., K. Steiglitz, and B. Dickinson. 1986. The complexity of analog computation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 28: 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are owing to Viv Kendon and Susan Stepney for continued collaboration in the art of ART, and for comments on the present article. DH is funded by UK EPSRC grant EP/L022303/1

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominic Horsman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Horsman, D. (2017). The Representation of Computation in Physical Systems. In: Massimi, M., Romeijn, JW., Schurz, G. (eds) EPSA15 Selected Papers. European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53730-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics