Skip to main content

Mechanisms and Reduction in Psychiatry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 329 Accesses

Part of the book series: European Studies in Philosophy of Science ((ESPS,volume 5))

Abstract

The view that psychiatry should be elucidating the mechanisms behind mental phenomena is gaining momentum. This view, coupled with an intuition that such mechanisms must, by nature, be biological, has inspired the field to look to cognitive neuroscience for classification of mental illnesses. One example of this kind of reorientation can be seen in the recent introduction of the Research Domain Criteria project (RDoC) by the U.S National Institute of Mental Health. The RDoC project is an attempt to introduce a new classification system based on brain circuits. The central idea behind the project is that mental disorders can be understood in terms of brain disorders and I argue that the project embodies a reductionist approach. The problem with this kind of reductionism is that multilevel explanations citing mental and social factors as part of the causal structures underlying mental disorders are rejected as non-scientific, or accepted only as provisional “stand-ins” for explanations to be found at the biological level. However, it is precisely such multilevel explanations that are necessary for progress in this fundamentally interdisciplinary science. This paper analyses the reductive nature of the RDoC project and investigates the potential for an interventionist account of causation and mechanism to bridge the gap between mechanistic explanations and multilevel explanations of mental disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I thank an anonymous referee for directing me towards Papineua’s argument.

  2. 2.

    Woodward translates questions about causal relations between events or instances of properties into questions about relations between variables.

  3. 3.

    A large part of the contemporary discussion of this issue has focused on the compatibility of a particular conception of mechanism, namely Craver’s account (Craver 2007) and interventionism (see for example Leuridan 2012). I will not enter into this detailed discussion here. For a detailed discussion see (Menzies 2012).

  4. 4.

    This section relies heavily work done in connection with a collaborative conference paper developed with Lena Kästner and presented at the Philosophy of Science in Practice conference in Aarhus 2015.

References

  • Akil, H., S. Brenner, E. Kandel, K.S. Kendler, M.-C. King, E. Scolnick, J.D. Watson, and H.Y. Zoghbi. 2010. The future of psychiatric research: Genomes and neural circuits. Science 327 (5973): 1580–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigandt, I., and A. Love. 2015. Reductionism in biology. In The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy [Online], ed. E. N. Zalta. Accessed 15 Aug 2016. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/reduction-biology/.

  • Campbell, J. 2007. An interventionist approach to causation in psychology. In Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy and computation, ed. Alison Opnik and Laura Schulz, 58–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charney, D.H., D. Barlow, Kelly Botteron, and Steven Zalcman. 2002. Neuroscience research agenda to guide development of a pathophysiologically based classification system. In A research agenda for DSM-V, ed. D. Kupfer and F. Michael, 31–84. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C.F. 2007. Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C.F., and L. Darden. 2013. In search of mechanisms: Discoveries across the life sciences. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbert, B., and T. Insel. 2013. Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine 11 (1): 126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowe, P. 2000. Physical Causation. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The causal-process-model theory of mechanisms. In Causality in the sciences, ed. P.M. Illari, F. Russo, and J. Williamson. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, I. 2009. Reduction in psychiatry. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 54 (8): 506–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P., and K. Stotz. 2013. Genetics and philosophy: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, C., and J. Woodward. 2003. Explanatory generalizations, part II: Plumbing explanatory depth. Noûs 37 (2): 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, S.H. 2010. The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 6: 155–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T. 2010. Faulty circuits. Scientific American 302 (4): 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T., B. Cuthbert, M. Garvey, R. Heinssen, D.S. Pine, K. Quinn, C. Sanislow, and P. Wang. 2010. Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry 167 (7): 748–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K.S. 2012. Levels of explanation in psychiatric and substance use disorders: Implications for the development of an etiologically based nosology. Molecular Psychiatry 17 (1): 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K.S., and J. Campbell. 2009. Interventionist causal models in psychiatry: Repositioning the mind-body problem. Psychological Medicine 39 (6): 881–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K.S., and M.B. First. 2010. Alternative futures for the DSM revision process: Iteration v. paradigm shift. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science 197 (4): 263–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K.S., L.M. Karkowski, and C.A. Prescott. 1999. Causal relationship between stressful life events and the onset of major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry 156 (6): 837–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmayer, L.J.M., and D.M.S. Crafa. 2014. What kind of science for psychiatry? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuridan, B. 2012. Three problems for the mutual manipulability account of constitutive relevance in mechanisms. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (2): 399–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, N. 2013. Addiction is not a brain disease (and it matters). Addictive Disorders 4: 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, P., L. Darden, and C.F. Craver. 2000. Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, P. 2012. The causal structure of mechanisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (4): 796–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D. 1994. Mental disorder, illness and biological disfunction. Philosophy 37: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, C.B., and P.B. Mortensen. 2001. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between urbanicity during upbringing and schizophrenia risk. Archives of General Psychiatry 58 (11): 1039–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S. 2011. The idea of mechanism. In Causality in the sciences, ed. P.M. Illari, F. Russo and J. Williamson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.C. 1984. Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Riel, R., and R. Van Gulick. 2016. Scientific reduction. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy [Online], ed. E.N. Zalta. Accessed 15 Aug 2016. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/scientific-reduction/.

  • Walker, E., V. Mittal, and K. Tessner. 2008. Stress and the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis in the developmental course of schizophrenia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4: 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. 2013. How can causal explanations explain? Erkenntnis 78 (2): 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. 2003. Making things happen. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Causation in biology: Stability, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biology and Philosophy 25 (3): 287–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lise Marie Andersen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Andersen, L.M. (2017). Mechanisms and Reduction in Psychiatry. In: Massimi, M., Romeijn, JW., Schurz, G. (eds) EPSA15 Selected Papers. European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53730-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics