Abstract
Although each scientific discipline has a specific approach to time and distinctive methodologies for implementing time in their models, pervasive issues about time still arise in all sciences, like the reality of time, the measurement of time, the definition of irreversibility and reversibility (time’s arrow), the status of the past, the notion of timescale, etc. In this introductive chapter, we claim that a comparative and interdisciplinary approach to time as it is used and represented in the natural sciences would be the most appropriate way to deal with these issues in order to provide a philosophical understanding of the time of nature. In the natural sciences, time is a crucial dimension of physics. However, we stress that “time in physics” is something of an abstraction, since “the physics” itself is nowadays a set of different disciplines working with heterogeneous models, assumptions, and experimental settings. Because of this disparity, several perspectives on time and time paradoxes emerge from various fields in physics. In addition to the controversies about the time in physics, we argue that geology, paleontology and biology should be included in the philosophical assessment of the nature of time: within these sciences, time indeed displays different properties, is investigated using very different methods and tools, and raise specific problems, many of them due to the fact that evolutionary theory is the current framework for much of biological investigation. Finally, this interdisciplinary approach leads to the question of the univocal or pluralist nature of the concept of time, which is raised in the conclusion of the chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See e.g. Thomas Gold and Herman Bondi (eds.), The Nature of Time, 1967, Raymond Flood and Michael Lockwood (eds.), The Nature of Time, 1986, Dennis Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime, 2 Vol. 2006, 2008, and most recently Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time , 2011, Adrian Bardon , The Future of the Philosophy of Time, 2012, Adrian Bardon and Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time, 2013, Abhay Ashtekar , and Vesselin Petkov (eds.), Springer Handbook of Spacetime, 2014 and L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.) , Debates in the Metaphysics of Time, 2014. See also Dean Rickles and Maria Kon (eds.) Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1326, Special Issue on “Flow of Time ”, October 2014.
References
Albert, D., and R. Galchen. 2009. A quantum threat to special relativity. Scientific American 300: 32–39.
Amundson, R. 2005. The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ashtekar, A., and V. Petkov, (eds.). 2014. Springer handbook of spacetime. Berlin : Springer.
Baer, K.E. 1828. Über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere. Königsberg: Bornträger.
Bardon, A. 2012. The future of the philosophy of time. New York: Routledge.
Bardon, A., and H. Dyke, (eds.). (2013). A companion to the philosophy of time. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Barriel, V. 2015. Character. In Handbook of evolutionary thinking in the sciences, ed. T. Heams, P. Huneman, G. Lecointre, and M. Silberstein, 115–140. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bird, A. 2007. Nature’s metaphysics: Laws and properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boltzmann, L. 1964 [1896]. Lectures on gas theory. Trans. Stephen G. Brush. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1966 [1877]. On the relation of a general mechanical theorem to the second law of thermodynamics. In Kinetic theory. Volume 2: Irreversible processes, ed. S.G. Brush, 188–193. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Bowler, P. 1971. Preformation and pre-existence in the seventeenth century: A brief analysis. Journal of the History of Biology 4 (2): 221–244.
Boyer, C. 1949. The history of Calculus. New York: Dover Publications.
Callender, C. (ed.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Canguilhem, G., G. Lapassade, G. Piquemal, and J. Ullman. 1962. Du développement à l’évolution au 19ème siècle. Paris: PUF.
Chang, H. 2004. Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chibbaro, S., L. Rondoni, and A. Vulpiani. 2014. Reductionism, emergence and levels of reality. Dordrecht: Springer.
Danchin, E., A. Charmontier, F.A. Champagne, A. Mesoudi, B. Pujol, and S. Blanchet. 2011. Beyond DNA: Integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics 12: 475–486.
Danchin, E., and A. Pocheville. 2014. Inheritance is where physiology meets evolution. Journal of Physiology 592: 2307–2317.
Dawkins, R. 1982. The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dieks, D. (ed.). (2006). The ontology of spacetime. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
———. (ed.). (2008). The ontology of spacetime II. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dobzhansky, Th. 1973. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher 35 (3): 125–129.
Duchesneau, F. 1987. Genèse de la théorie cellulaire. Paris: Vrin.
Dupont, J.-C. 2007. Pre-kantian revival of epigenesis: Caspar Friedrich Wolff’s De formatione intestinorum. In Understanding purpose: Kant and the philosophy of biology, ed. P. Huneman, 37–49. Rochester: University Rochester Press.
Eddington, A. 1990. Space, time and gravitation. An outline of the general relativity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flood, R., and M. Lockwood, (eds.). 1986. The nature of time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gayon, J. 1998. Darwinism’s struggle for survival: Heredity and the hypothesis of natural selection. Trans. M. Cobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Gödel, K. 1949. A remark about the relationship between relativity theory and idealistic philosophy. In Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist, ed. P.A. Schilpp, 557–562. La Salle: Open Court.
Gold, T., and H. Bondi, (eds.) (1967). The nature of time. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Gould, S.J. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1989. Wonderful life: The burgess shale and the nature of history. New York: W. W. Norton.
Goy, I. 2014. Epigenetic theories. Caspar Friedrich Wolff and Immanuel Kant. In Kant’s theory of biology, ed. I. Goy and E. Watkins, 45–60. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
Grünbaum, A. 1963. Philosophical problems of space and time. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Hoffheimer, M.H. 1982. Maupertuis and the eighteenth century critique of pre-existence. Journal of the History of Biology 15 (1): 119–144.
Hopwood, N. 2000. Producing development: The anatomy of human embryos and the norms of Wilhelm His. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 74(1): 29–79.
Huneman, P. 2007. Reflexive judgement and wolffian embryology: Kant’s shift between the first and the third Critique. In Understanding purpose ? Kant and the philosophy of biology, Publication Series of the North American Kant Society, ed. P. Huneman, 75–100. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
Huneman P., and D. Walsh, (eds.) (2017). Challenging the modern synthesis: Development, inheritance, adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jablonka, E. (with Lamb, M.). 2005. Evolution in four dimensions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kauffman, S. 1993. The origins of order: Self organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kearl, M. 2009. Wilhelm Roux (1850–1924). Embryo project encyclopedia (2009–07-22). ISSN: 1940–5030. http://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/1753
Ladyman, J. (with Ross, Don). 2009. Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leibniz, G.W. 1998. The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence, ed. H.G. Alexander. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Lenoir, T. 1982. The strategy of life. Teleology and mechanism in nineteenth century German biology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Lovejoy, A. 1936. The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Maudlin, T. 2007. The Metaphysics within physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mayr, E. 1961. Cause and effect in biology. Science 134 (3489): 1501–1506.
Mesoudi, A., S. Blanchet, A. Charmentier, et al. 2013. Is non-genetic inheritance just a proximate mechanism? A corroboration of the extended evolutionary synthesis. Biological Theory 7 (3): 189–195.
North, J. 2011. Time in Thermodynamics. In The Oxford handbook of philosophy of time, ed. G. Callender, 312–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oaklander, L. N. (ed.). (2014). Debates in the metaphysics of time. London: Bloomsbury.
Oppenheimer, J. 1967. Essays in history of embryology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pigliucci, M., and G. Müller, (eds.) (2011). Evolution: The extended synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Price, H. 1996. Time’s arrow and Archimedes’ point. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prigogine, I. 1961. Introduction to the thermodynamics of irreversible processes. New York: Interscience.
Prigogine, I. (with Nicolis, G.). 1977. Self-organization in non-equilibrium systems. New York: Wiley.
Putnam, H. 1967. Time and physical geometry. The Journal of Philosophy 64 (8): 240–247.
Reichenbach, H. 1920. Relativitatstheorie und Erkenntnis a priori. Berlin: J. Springer.
———. 1928. Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Berlin and Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter.
———. 1956. The direction of time. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Richards, R.J. 1992. The meaning of evolution. The morphological construction and ideological reconstruction of Darwin’s theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Rickles, D., and M. Kon, (eds.) (2014). Flow of Time. Special issue of the annals of the New York academy of sciences, 1326, 1–96.
Ricoeur, P. 1984. Time and narrative. vol. 1. Trans. K. McLaughlin and P. Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 1985. Time and narrative. vol. 2. Trans. K. McLaughlin and P. Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 1988. Time and narrative. vol. 3: Narrated time. Trans. K. McLaughlin and P. Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Roe, S. 1980. Matter, life and generation. Eighteenth century embryology and the Haller-Wolff debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roger, J. 1963. Les sciences de la vie dans la pensée française au 18ème siècle. Paris: Albin Michel.
Rudwick, M.J.S. 2005. Bursting the limits of time: The reconstruction of geohistory in the age of revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Scott-Phillips, T.C., et al. 2011. Evolutionary theory and the ultimate-proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 38–47.
Sklar, L. 1974. Time, space, and space-time. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1985. Philosophy and space-time Physics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1993. Physics and chance. Philosophical issues in the foundations of statistical mechanics. Cambridge: University of Cambridge University Press.
Uffink, J. 2007. Compendium to the foundations of classical statistical mechanics. In Handbook for the philosophy of physics, ed. J. Butterfield and J. Earman, 924–1074. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Weyl, H. 1949. Philosophy of mathematics and natural science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of Genetics 1: 356–366.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Andrew McFarland (The City University of New York) for a thorough language check of the text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bouton, C., Huneman, P. (2017). Introduction: Time Between Metaphysics and Natural Sciences: From Physics to Biology. In: Bouton, C., Huneman, P. (eds) Time of Nature and the Nature of Time. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53725-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53725-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53723-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53725-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)