Abstract
This chapter aims to develop a theory for the purpose of explaining variation in political gains among stateless nations. It is limited to a study on the Kurds in Iran , and seeks to explain their gains in the past, as well why they are lagging behind compared to their fellow Kurds in the Middle East . Three arguments are advanced. First, variation in political gains reflects the distribution of power or, alternatively, the balance of power between ethnic groups within a state. Second, the historical record shows that opportunities for political gains for the Kurds in Iran (and in neighboring countries) arise during circumstances when the balance of power between the Kurds and the ruling state is upset. These pertain, respectively, to external intervention by great powers; internal upheaval or revolution; and sustained guerilla warfare facilitated by rivalries between regional states. Third, the current (im)balance of power between the Kurds and the Iranian state account for their disadvantageous position compared to their fellow Kurds. In the absence of a shift in the balance of power in favor of the Kurds, this situation is likely to remain unchanged in the foreseeable future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ahmadzadeh, H., and Gareth, S. (2010). The Political, Cultural, and Military Re-Awakening of the Kurdish Nationalist Movement in Iran. Middle East Journal 64 (1): 11–28.
Al, S., and Gutaj, P. 2017. Statehood and the political dynamics of insurgency: KLA and PKK in comparative perspective. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 19 (2): 91–104.
Andrea, R. 2016. Why is Iran Fighting This Kurdish Group Again After 20 Years? The National Interest, July 28, 2016. Retrieved from http://nationalinterest.org/feature/why-iran-fighting-kurdish-group-again-after-20-years-17171. Accessed 20 Jan, 2017.
Arreguin-Toft, I. 2011. How the Weak Win Wars: The Theory Of Asymmetric Conflict. International Security 26 (1): 93–128.
Asgharzadeh, A. 2007. Iran and the Challenge of Diversity: Islamic Fundamentalism, Aryanist Racism, and Democratic Struggles. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Aydin, A., and Emrence, C. 2015. Zones of Rebellion: Kurdish Insurgents and the Turkish State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Chenoweth, E., and Maria Stephan. 2008. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. International Security 33 (1): 7–44.
Eckstein, H. 1975. Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 7, ed. F. Greenstein and N. Polsby, 79–137. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Entessar, N. 2010. Kurdish Politics in the Middle East. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Fenna, A., and Hueglin, T.O. 2006. Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry. Ontario: Broadview Press.
Friend, J.W. 2012. Stateless Nations: Western European Regional Nationalisms and the Old Nations. New York: Palgrave.
Gerring, J. 2004. What is a Case and What Is It Good For? American Political Science Review 98 (2): 341–354.
Guzzini, S. (2005). The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 495–522.
Hall, S. (1986). Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. Journal of Communication Inquiry 10(2): 5–27.
Hall, S. 1986. Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. Journal of Communication Inquiry 10(2): 5–27.
Hassanpour, A., and S. Mojab. 1995. The Politics of Nationality and Ethnic Diversity. In Iran after the Revolution: Crisis of an Islamic State, ed. S. Rahnema and S. Behdad, 229–250. London: I.B. Tauris.
Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. 2007. Murder at Mykonos: Anatomy of a Political Assassination. Retrieved from http://www.iranhrdc.org/english/pdfs/Reports/murder_at_mykonos_report.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. 2008. No Safe Haven: Iran’s Global Assassination Campaign. Retrieved from http://www.iranhrdc.org/english/publications/reports/3152-no-safe-haven-iran-s-global-assassination-campaign.html#.UbfTcvnWNgs. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
Krause, P. 2013/2014. The Structure of Success: How the Internal Distribution of Power Drives Armed Group Behavior and National Movement Effectiveness. International Security 38 (3): 72–116.
Kymklicka, W. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mack, A. J. R. 1975. Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict. World Politics 27(2): 175–200.
Marcus, A. 2007. Blood and Belief: The PKK and the Kurdish Fight for Independence. New York: New York University Press.
Lawrence, Q. 2008. Invisible Nation: How the Kurds’ Quest for Statehood is Shaping Iraq and the Middle East. New York: Walker & Company.
McDowall, D. 1996. A Modern History of the Kurds. London: I.B. Tauris.
Miller, B. 2007.States, Nations and the Great Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Natali, D. 2005. The Kurds and the State: Evolving National Identity, in Iraq, Turkey, and Iran. New York: Syracuse University Press.
Pdki.org. August 23, 2012. PDKI—Komala Signed Memorandum of Agreement for Cooperation and Coordination. Retrieved from http://pdki.org/english/pdki-komala-memorandum-of-agreement-for-cooperation-and-coordination/. Accessed 15 Apr 2016.
Prunhuber, C. 2009. The Passion and Death of Rahman the Kurd: Dreaming Kurdistan. New York: iUniverse.
Romano, D. 2006. The Kurdish Nationalist Movement: Opportunity, Mobilization and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Record, J. 2007. Beating Goliath: Why Insurgencies Win. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.
Sado-pancau-yek andami hzbi demokrati kordestani eran la bashori kordestan terorkrawen [151 Members of the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan Have Been Assassinated in South Kurdistan]. 2007, 24 April. Midya, 2–6.
Schweller, R. 1997. New Realist Research on Alliances: Refining, Not Refuting, Waltz’s Balancing Proposition. American Political Science Review 91 (4): 927–930.
Tripp, C. 2007. A History of Iraq. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vali, A. 1998. The Kurds and Their ‘Others’: Fragmented Identity and Fragmented Politics. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 18 (2): 82–95.
Vali, A. 2011. Kurds and the State in Iran: The Making of Kurdish Identity. London: I.B. Tauris.
Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wendt, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yassin, B.A. 1995. Vision or Reality? The Kurds in the Policy of the Great Powers, 1941–1947. Lund: Lund University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ahmedi, I. (2018). The Stateless and Why Some Gain and Others not: The Case of Iranian Kurdistan. In: Tugdar, E., Al, S. (eds) Comparative Kurdish Politics in the Middle East. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53715-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53715-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53714-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53715-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)