Advertisement

Constraints and Development

  • Joel David MooreEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Political Economy of East Asia book series (TPEEA)

Abstract

This chapter explores the scholarship on veto players and development in depth and develops a typology that accounts for the anomalies identified in the first chapter. I argue that the degree of systemic vulnerability is the deciding factor in determining the type of economic governance institutions for single veto player autocracies. For single veto player governments, a particularistic policy environment and a hierarchical variety of capitalism will emerge unless systemic vulnerabilities are present as an alternative form of constraint. Thus, systemic vulnerability conditions the impact of the single veto player. Conversely, governments with very many veto players will have hierarchical governance systems because the various veto players will be unable to cooperate in order to restrict the provision of political rents.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsden, A. H. (2001). The rise of the rest, 1850–2000: Late industrialization outside the North Atlantic economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee, A., Iyer, L., & Somanathan, R. (2005). History, social divisions, and public goods in rural India. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2–3), 639–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrientos, S., Gereffi, G., & Rossi, A. (2011). Economic and social upgrading in global production networks. International Labour Review, 150(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brimble, P., & Doner, R. F. (2007). University-industry linkages and economic development: The case of Thailand. World Development, 35(6), 1021–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. (2003). The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  7. Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. W. (2015). Global production networks: Theorizing economic development in an interconnected world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. (2001). The institutional determinants of economic policy outcomes. In S. Haggard & M. McCubbins (Eds.), Presidents, parliaments, and policy (pp. 21–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Crouch, C. (2005a). Capitalist diversity and change: Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crouch, C. (2005b). Models of capitalism. New Political Economy, 10(4), 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummings, M. W. (1998). National security and the rise of the developmental state in South Korean and Taiwan. In H. S. Rowen (Ed.), Behind East Asian growth: The political and social foundations of prosperity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Doner, R. F., Ritchie, B., & Slater, D. (2005). Systemic vulnerability and the origins of developmental states: Northeast and Southeast Asia in comparative perspective. International Organization, 59(2), 327–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doner, R. F., Hicken, A., & Ritchie, B. (2009). Political challenges of innovation in the developing world. Review of Policy Research, 26(1–2), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans, P. B. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation (Vol. 2011). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Feenstra, R. C., & Hamilton, G. G. (2006). Emergent economies, divergent paths: Economic organization and international trade in South Korea and Taiwan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1086/648632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gomez, E. T., & Xiao, X. (2004). Chinese enterprise, transnationalism, and identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Gourevitch, P., & Hawes, M. (2002). The politics of choice among national production systems. L’Année de La Régulation, 6, 241–270.Google Scholar
  20. Gourevitch, P. (2003). Political determinants of corporate governance: Political context, corporate impact. Yale Law Journal, 112(7), 1829–1881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gourevitch, P., & Shinn, J. (2005). Political power and corporate control: The new global politics of corporate governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall, P., & Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 7, 7–34. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwn020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hicken, A., & Ritchie, B. (2002). The origin of credibility enhancing institutions in Southeast Asia. Paper delivered at the American Political Science annual meeting.Google Scholar
  25. Howell, C. (2017). Review: Varieties of capitalism: And then there was one? Reviewed work(s): Varieties of capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage by Peter Hall and David Soskice; The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in.Google Scholar
  26. Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P., & Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National innovation system in less successful developing countries: The case of Thailand. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1445–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: Growth of industrial policy: 1925–1975. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lall, S. (1998). Technology and human capital in maturing Asian countries. Science Technology & Society, 3(1), 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lane, C., & Probert, J. (2009). National capitalisms, global production networks: Fashioning the value chain in the UK, US, and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199214815.001.0001.
  30. Lincoln, J. R., & Gerlach, M. L. (1992). Japan’ s network economy. Social sciences.Google Scholar
  31. MacIntyre, A. (2003a). Institutions and investors: The politics of the economic crisis in Southeast Asia. International Organization, 55(1), 81–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacIntyre, A. (2003b). The power of institutions: Political architecture and governance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  33. McKendrick, D., Doner, R. F., & Haggard, S. (2000). From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and competitive advantage in the hard disk drive industry. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Miguel, E., & Gugerty, M. K. (2005). Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11–12), 2325–2368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Noble, G. W. (1998). Collective action in East Asia: How ruling parties shape industrial policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Porta, L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Redding, S. G. (1996). The distinct nature of Chinese capitalism. The Pacific Review, 9(3), 426–441. doi: 10.1080/09512749608719195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ritchie, B. (2010). Systemic vulnerability and sustainable economic growth: Skills and upgrading in Southeast Asia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ross, M. L. (1999). The political economy of the resource curse. World Politics, 51, 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1997). Natural resource abundance and economic growth—Revised.Google Scholar
  41. Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Small, M., & Singer, J. D. (2006). Correlates of war project: Data sets.Google Scholar
  43. Tanzer, A. (1994). The bamboo network. Forbes, 154(2), 138–144.Google Scholar
  44. Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Waldner, D. (1999). State building and late development. State Building and Late Development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Weidenbaum, M. L., & Hughes, S. (1996). The bamboo network: How expatriate Chinese entrepreneurs are creating a new economic superpower in Asia. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  47. Yeung, H. W., & Coe, N. M. (2015). Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography, 91(1), 29–58. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monash University MalaysiaBandar SunwayMalaysia

Personalised recommendations