Skip to main content

Processing Speed of Infants with High and Low Communicative Skills

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language Development and Disorders in Spanish-speaking Children

Part of the book series: Literacy Studies ((LITS,volume 14))

Abstract

Background and rationale. While experimental psychology has focused on the study of processes that determine the individual’s behaviour in specific experimental situations, the studies concerning individual differences have analyzed the stability of observed differences on performance between individuals, in particular those which can be generalized through diverse situations or tasks (Williams et al., J Exp Anal Behav 90:219–231, 2008). Several studies have shown that processing speed is a useful variable to study how age and ability in a specific task affect the performance in more general cognitive tasks such as language (Zheng et al., Psyc Bulletin & Rev 7:113–120, 2000). In studies with infants for example, it is known that younger children are slower to process linguistic stimuli compared with older children while they respond to the same task (Fernald et al. 1998); and that there is a positive relation between vocabulary development and processing speed during the second year of life (Fernald et al., Child Dev 72(4):1003–1015, 2001; Fernald et al., Dev Psychol 42(1):98–116, 2006; Zangl et al., J Cogn Dev 6(2):179–208, 2005).

The present study analyzes the individual differences in processing speed of infants and its relation with the development of communicative skills during the first year of life. Methods. Using the Intermodal Preferential Looking paradigm (IPL), an experimental task was designed whose goal was to determine the time that infants took to look at the target in a word learning task, as well as the relation between processing speed and the vocabulary of the infants measured with the MacArthur Inventory (CD-I). The infants were assigned to one of two groups depending on their performance on the comprehension subscale of the CDI-I Inventory (Group 1: below percentile 25; Group 2: above percentile 75).

Results. Results showed that the infants who scored below percentile 25 on the CDI-I Inventory presented a higher processing time in the experimental task; on the contrary, the group of infants who scored above percentile 75 on the Inventory, showed a lower processing time. In general, the infants above percentile 75 on the comprehension subscale were 11% faster than their peers below percentile 25, in the word learning task.

Discussion. The findings shown here suggest that once age is controlled, differences in the infants’ communicative skills at early ages such as 12 months reflect differences in linguistic skills, such as word learning. Finally, the findings showed here support the study of individual differences in infants’ processing speed in the first year of life in specific experimental tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alva, E. (2004). Modelos de desarrollo del lenguaje espontáneo en infantes y escolares: Análisis de muestras masivas. Tesis doctoral. Facultad de Psicología. UNAM. México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alva, E. (2007). Del universo de los sonidos a la palabra: Investigaciones sobre el desarrollo del lenguaje en infantes. México: UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias-Trejo, N., & Plunkett, K. (2010). The effects of perceptual similarity and category membership on early word-referent identification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 63–80. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, et al. (2006). Stability in cognition across early childhood: A developmental cascade. Psychological Science, 17(2), 151. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01678.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, T., & Haith, M. (1997). Infant expectations and reaction time as predictors of childhood speed of processing and IQ. Developmental Psychology, 33, 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcón, A., Alva, E., & Franco, A. (2013). Segmentación y categorización intraléxica por infantes aprendices del español de 9 a 12 meses de edad. Psicológica, 34, 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantz, R. (1961). The origin of form perception. Scientific American, 204, 66–72. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0561-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantz, R. (1975). Visual attention to size and number of pattern details by term and preterm infants during the first six months. Child Development, 46(1), 3–18. doi:10.2307/1128828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, A., Swingley, D., & Pinto, J. (2001). When half word is enough: Infants can recognize spoken words using partial phonetic information. Child Development, 72(4), 1003–1015. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, A., Perfors, A., & Marchman, V. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 98–116. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. & Marchman, V. (2008). Looking while listening, using eye movement to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children, En Developmental Psycholinguistics. On-line methods in children’s language processing. Chapter 4. Amsterdan/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, A., & Hale, S. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a development cascade. Psychological Science, 7(4). doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00366.x.

  • Fry, A., & Hale, S. (2000). Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Biological Psychology, 54, 1–34. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00051-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golinkoff, R., & Hirsch-Pasek, K. (2001). Cómo hablan los bebés: la magia y el misterio de lenguaje durante los primeros tres años. México: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golinkoff, R., Hirsch-Pasek, K., Cauley, K., & Gordon. (1987). The eyes have it: Lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 14, 23–45. doi:10.1017/S030500090001271X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haith, M., Hazan, C., & Goodman, G. (1988). Expectation and anticipation of dynamic visual events by 3.5-Month-Old babies. Child Development, 59, 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, S. (1990). A global developmental trend in cognitive processing speed. Child Development, 61, 653–663. doi:10.2307/1130951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, S., & Jansen, J. (1994). Global processing-time coefficients characterize individual and group differences in cognitive speed. Psychological Science, 5, 384–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im-Bolter, N., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2006). Processing limitations in children with specific language impairment: The role of executive function. Child Development, 77(6), 1822–1841. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00976.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson-Maldonado, D., Thal, D., Marchman, V., Newton, T., Fenson, L., & Conboy, B. (2003). El Inventario del Desarrollo de Habilidades Comunicativas: User’s guide and technical manual. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, T., Falcón, A., Alva, E. & Miramontes, V. (2014). Pilito y pilote, ¿Se trata del tamaño?: Adquisición de los diminutivos y aumentativos. Trabajo presentado en el XXII Congreso Mexicano de Psicología, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. (1991). Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490–501. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. (2000). Speed of information processing: Developmental change and links to intelligence. Journal of School Psychology, 38(1), 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. (2007). Children and their development. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R., & Hall, L. (1999). Sources of developmental change in children’s word problem performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 660–668. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.91.4.660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R., & Salthouse, T. (1994). Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta Psychologica, 86, 199–225. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(94)90003-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, L. B. (2014). Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchman, V., & Fernald, A. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science, 11(3), 9–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00671.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, R., & Carriger, M. (1993). A meta-analysis of infant habituation and recognition memory performance as predictors of later IQ. Child Development, 64(1), 57–79. doi:10.2307/1131437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. A., Kail, R., Leonard, L. B., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Speed of processing in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(2), 416–433. http://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2001/034).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, J., Hale, S., Zheng, Y., Jenkins, L., & Widaman, K. F. (2003). The difference engine: A model of diversity in speeded cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 262–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznick, J., Chawarska, K., & Betts, S. (2000). The development of visual expectations in the first year. Child Development, 71(5), 1191–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., & Feldman, J. (1997). Memory and speed: Their role in the relation of infant information processing to later IQ. Child Development, 68(4), 630–641. doi:10.2307/1132115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., Feldman, J., & Wallace, I. (1992). Infant information processing in relation to six-year cognitive outcomes. Child Development, 63(5), 1126–1114. doi:10.2307/1131522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., Feldman, J., & Jankowski, J. (2003). The building blocks of cognition. Journal of Pediatrics, 143, 54–61. doi:10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00402-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., Feldman, J., & Jankowski, J. (2005). The structure of infant cognition at 1 year. Intelligence, 33, 231–250. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2004.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., Feldman, J., Jankowski, J., & Van Rossem, R. (2012). Information processing from infancy to 11 years: Continuities and prediction of IQ. Intelligence, 40(5), 445–457. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2012.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, G., & Plunkett, K. (1998). Rapid word learning by fifteen-month-olds under tightly controlled conditions. Child Development, 69(2), 309–320. doi:10.2307/1132166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, P. (2015). Análisis de la velocidad de procesamiento y su relación con habilidades lingüísticas en infantes mexicanos. Ciencia Nueva. UNAM. México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wass, T., Lewis, A., & Haith, M. (1998). Infants' sensitivity to temporal parameters of the visual expectation paradigm. Infant Behavior & Development, 21, 747. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(98)91960-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weismer, S. E., & Evans, J. L. (2002). The role of processing limitations in early identification of specific language impairment. Topics in Language Disorders, 22(3), 15–29. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://000175506800004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2008). Individual differences, intelligence and behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangl, R., Klarman, L., Thal, D., Fernald, A., & Bates, E. (2005). Dynamics of word comprehension in Infancy: Developments in timing, accuracy and resistance to acoustic degradation. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6(2), 179–208. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0602_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2000). Age and individual differences in information- processing speed: Testing the magnification hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elda Alicia Alva Canto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alva Canto, E.A., Suárez Brito, P. (2017). Processing Speed of Infants with High and Low Communicative Skills. In: Auza Benavides, A., Schwartz, R. (eds) Language Development and Disorders in Spanish-speaking Children. Literacy Studies, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53646-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53646-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53645-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53646-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics