Advertisement

Personality’s Role in Shaping Civic Aptitude

Chapter
  • 156 Downloads

Abstract

In the final chapter the author evaluates the results reported previously in relation to personality’s effect on the ability of individuals to understand and engage in politics in a manner consistent with the demands placed upon them as democratic citizens. In addition to summing up the empirical results, the author also discusses where our political system can go from here. Calls for more and better education will continue to have little effect on the average citizen’s overall political knowledge and interest because much of the cause of their apathy is outside of conscious thought. Personality is but one factor found in the hidden depths of the unconscious mind influencing political behavior. Thus, the author takes the baton from Achen and Bartels (Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016) and presents his ideas on how the electoral process should be altered in order to accommodate the way our individual minds really work.

Keywords

Political Participation Emotional Stability Direct Democracy Welfare Recipient Political Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Achen, Christopher H., and Larry Bartels. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alford, John R., Carolyn L. Funk, and John R. Hibbing. 2005. “Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?” American Political Science Review 99: 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandyopadhyay, Siddhartha, and Bryan C. McCannon. 2014. “The Effect of the Election of Prosecutors on Criminal Trials.” Public Choice 161: 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uniformed Voters: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 194–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartels, Larry M. 2008. “The Irrational Electorate.” The Wilson Quarterly 32: 44–50.Google Scholar
  6. Berdejó, Carlos, and Noam M. Yuchtman. 2013. “Crime, Punishment and Politics: An Analysis of Political Cycles in Criminal Sentencing.” Review of Economics and Statistics 95: 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, Kate. 2015. “How Judicial Elections Impact Criminal Cases.” Brennan Center for Justice. Available: http://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/How_Judicial_Elections_Impact_Criminal_Cases.pdf
  8. Bolsen, Toby, James N. Druckman, and Fay Lomax Cook. 2014. “The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion.” Political Behavior 36: 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Tom S. Clark, and Jason P. Kelly. 2014. “Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions.” American Political Science Review 108: 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Claassen, Ryan L., and Michael J. Ensley. 2016. “Motivated Reasoning and Yard-Sign-Stealing Partisans: Mine Is a Likable Rogue, Yours Is a Degenerate Criminal.” Political Behavior 38: 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, Alma, Alon Klement, and Zvika Neeman. 2015. “Judicial Decision Making: A Dynamic Reputation Approach.” Journal of Legal Studies 44: S133–S159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuik, David J., and Berwood A. Yost. 2016. “The Effects of Issue Salience, Elite Influence, and Policy Content on Public Opinion.” Political Communication 33: 328–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dick, Philip K. 1968. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  14. Druckman, James N., and Arthur Lupia. 2016. “Preference Change in Competitive Political Environments.” Annual Review of Political Science 19: 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dusso, Aaron. 2015. “Incorrect Voting in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: How Partisan and Economic Cues Fail to Help Low-Information Voters.” Electoral Studies 37: 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis, Christopher, and James A. Stimson. 2012. Ideology in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Enns, Peter K., Paul M. Kellstedt, and Gregory E. McAvoy. 2012. “The Consequences of Partisanship in Economic Perceptions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76: 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Estlund, David M. 2008. Democratic Authority. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fowler, James H., and Christopher T. Dawes. 2008. “Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout.” Journal of Politics 70: 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fowler, James H., Laura A. Baker, and Christopher T. Dawes. 2008. “Genetic Variation in Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 102: 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerber, Alan S., and Gregory A. Huber. 2010. “Partisanship, Political Control, and Economic Assessments.” American Journal of Political Science 54: 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerber, Alan S., Gregory A. Huber, David Doherty, and Conor M. Dowling. 2011b. “Personality Traits and the Consumption of Political Information.” American Political Research 39: 32–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gerber, Alan S., Gregory A. Huber, David Doherty, Conor M. Dowling, and Costas Panagopoulos. 2013b. “Big Five Personality Traits and Responses to Persuasive Appeals: Results from Voter Turnout Experiments.” Political Behavior 35: 687–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hibbing, John R., Kevin B. Smith, and John R. Alford. 2014b. Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Hochschild, Jennifer L., and Katherine Levine Einstein. 2015. Do Facts Matter? Information and Misinformation in American Politics. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kahan, Dan M. 2013. “Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection.” Judgment and Decision Making 8: 407–424.Google Scholar
  27. Kahan, Dan M., Ellen Peters, Maggie Wittlin, Paul Slovic, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Donald Braman, and Gregroy N. Mandel. 2012. “The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change 2: 732–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kahan, Dan M., Ellen Peters, Erica Cantrell Dawson, and Paul Slovic. 2013. “Motivated Numeracy and Enlightened Self-Government.” Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 116.Google Scholar
  29. Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lenz, Gabriel S. 2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lodge, Milton, and Charles S. Taber. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, Michael MacKuen, and Ann N. Crigler. 2007. The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maskivker, Julia. 2016. “An Epistemic Justification for the Obligation to Vote.” Critical Review 28: 24–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCannon, Bryan. 2013. “Prosecutor Elections, Mistakes, and Appeals.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10: 696–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mondak, Jeffery J. 2010. Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mullinix, Kevin J. 2016. “Partisanship and Preference Formation: Competing Motivations, Elite Polarization, and Issue Importance.” Political Behavior 38: 383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mummolo, Jonathan. 2016. “News from the Other Side: How Topic Relevance Limits the Prevalence of Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Politics 78: 763–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Osterhammel, Jürgen. 2014. The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Perry, Ryan, and Chris G. Sibley. 2013. “Seize and Freeze: Openness to Experience Shapes Judgments of Societal Threat.” Journal of Research in Personality 47: 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Plato. 2007. The Republic. New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  42. Przeworski, Adam. 2010. Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Redlawsk, David P., Andrew J. W. Civettini, and Karen M. Emmerson. 2010. “The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever ‘Get It’?” Political Psychology 31: 563–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1988. Rousseau’s Political Writings. Edited by Alan Ritter and Julia Conaway Bondanella, translated by Julia Conaway Bondanella. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  45. Shepherd, Joanna M. 2009. “The Influence of Retention Politics on Judges’ Voting.” Journal of Legal Studies 38: 169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shepherd, Joanna M. 2013. “Justice at Risk: An Empirical Analysis of Campaign Contributions and Judicial Decisions.” American Constitution Society for Law and Policy. Available: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1307928/justice-at-risk.pdf
  47. Sides, John. 2016. “Stories of Science? Facts, Frames, and Policy Attitudes.” American Politics Research 44: 387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wagner, Markus, Jessica Tarlov, and Nick Vivyan. 2014. “Partisan Bias in Opinion Formation on Episodes of Political Controversy: Evidence from Great Britain.” Political Studies 62: 136–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weeks, Brian E. 2015. “Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation.” Journal of Communication 65: 699–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Political ScienceIndiana University–Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations