Skip to main content

Systems Thinking Methodologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systems Thinking for School Leaders
  • 1643 Accesses

Abstract

In order to understand how systems thinking can be used as a management approach, we turn to the most significant past attempts that have been undertaken to apply a holistic approach for improving organizational performance. For this purpose, this chapter provides a review of some of the best-known and most useful holistic approaches to management, all of which make use of systems thinking. According to these approaches, applied systems thinking is a highly structured procedure, which involves a series of steps requiring much attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff, R. (2001). A brief guide to interactive planning and idealized design. Retrieved from http://www.ida.liu.se/~steho/und/htdd01/AckoffGuidetoIdealizedRedesign.pdf

  • Allen, P. M. (2001). A complex systems approach to learning in adaptive networks. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(2), 150–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the firm. London, UK: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1974). Designing freedom. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, I., & Davis, C. (2000). Emergence and accomplishment in organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(2), 178–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boal, K. B., & Schultz, P. L. (2007). Storytelling, time and evolution: The role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (2012). Systems thinking strategy: The new way to understand your business and drive performance. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnes, B. (2005). Complexity theories and organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A., & Knox, J. S. (2011). Classrooms as complex adaptive systems: A relational model. Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 15(1). Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume15/ej57/ej57a1/

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice; Soft systems methodology: A 30 year retrospective. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiva-Gomez, R. (2003). The facilitating factors for organizational learning: Bringing ideas from complex adaptive systems. Knowledge and Process Management, 10(2), 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. K., & Brower, R. S. (2006). When practice matters more than government plans: A network analysis of local emergency management. Administration and Society, 37(6), 651–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K. J., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19(3), 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1968). Principles of systems. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. (2010). Simply complexity: A clear guide to complexity theory. Oxford, UK: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R. (2015). Systems thinking for business: Capitalize on structures hidden in plain sight. Portland, OR: Systems Solutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, B. B., & Plowman, D. A. (2009). The leadership of emergence: A complex systems leadership theory of emergence at successive organizational levels. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G. (2008). Beyond transactional and transformational leadership: Can leaders still lead when they don’t know what to do? In M. Uhl-Bien & R. Marion (Eds.), Complexity leadership, Part 1: Conceptual foundations (pp. 155–184). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macadam, R. D., & Packham, R. G. (1989). A case study in the use of soft systems methodology: Restructuring an academic organisation to facilitate the education of systems agriculturalists. Agricultural Systems, 30(4), 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandviwalla, M., & Schuff, D. (2014). Reimagining the higher education experience as a socially-enabled complex adaptive system. Paper presented at the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, J. W., De Ladurantey, J., & Newell, W. H. (2007). Complex systems, governance, and policy administration consequences. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 9(1–2), 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organisations: The application of complexity theory to organisations. Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., & Emshoff, J. R. (1979). On strategic assumption-making: A dialectical approach to policy and planning. Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morcol, G. (2005). A new systems thinking: Implications of the sciences of complexity for public policy and administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 29(3), 297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, C. (2008). The class as a learning entity (complex adaptive system): An idea from complexity science and educational research. Simon Fraser University Educational Review, 2(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Day, J. A. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 293–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E., & Eoyang, G. (2001). Facilitating organization change: Lessons from complexity science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, N. V. (1995). Application of soft systems methodology to the real world process of teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 9(1), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Currency, Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2012). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents and everyone who cares about education. New York, NY: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (2001). Complex responsive process in organizations: Learning and knowledge creation. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2002). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., & Marion, R. (2009). Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 631–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy. Bern, Switzerland: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C., & Keane, W. G. (2008). Building capacity for professional learning communities through a systems approach: A toolbox for superintendents. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 4(4), 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or communication and control in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. London, UK: Eyre and Spottiswoode.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., & Van Haperen, K. (2015). Soft systems thinking, methodology and the management of change. London, UK: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yadin, A. (2013). Soft systems methodology in an educational context: Enhancing students’ perception and understanding. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3(5), 351–356.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haim Shaked .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shaked, H., Schechter, C. (2017). Systems Thinking Methodologies. In: Systems Thinking for School Leaders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53571-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53571-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53570-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53571-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics