Skip to main content

Instrumental Rationality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
On Reasoning and Argument

Part of the book series: Argumentation Library ((ARGA,volume 30))

  • 1368 Accesses

Abstract

Comprehensive reasoning from end to means requires an initiating intention to bring about some goal, along with five premisses: a specified means would immediately contribute to realization of the goal, the goal is achievable, the means is permissible, no alternative means is preferable, and the side effects do not outweigh the benefits of achieving the goal. Its conclusion is a decision to bring about the means. The scheme can be reiterated until an implementable means is reached. In a particular context, resource limitations may warrant truncation of the reasoning.

Bibliographical note: This chapter was previously published in Argumentation in multi-agent systems: 7th International Workshop, ArgMAS 2010, Toronto, ON, Canada, May 2010: Revised, selected and invited papers. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 6614, ed. Peter McBurney, Iyad Rahwan, and Simon Parsons (Springer, 2011), 1–11. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011. With permission of Springer. I would like to acknowledge helpful comments on my presentation of earlier versions of this chapter at the Seventh International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2010) and at the Seventh Conference on Argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). At the latter conference, comments by Michael Gilbert , Hanns Hohmann , Erik Krabbe , Alain Létourneau and Christof Lumer were particularly helpful. I would also like to acknowledge helpful reviews of the paper by Fabio Paglieri for ISSA and by two anonymous reviewers for ArgMAS 2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anscombe, Elizabeth. 1963. Intention, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle 1984. The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation, Vols. 1–2, ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Katie, and Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 2007 Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artificial Intelligence 171: 855–874. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.009.

  • Bratman, Michael E. 1987. Intentions, plans and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, Cristiano, and Fabio Paglieri. 2007. The role of beliefs in goal dynamics: prolegomena to a constructive theory of intentions. Synthese 155: 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eminem. 2008. Careful what you wish for lyrics. Retrieved from http://www.metrolyrics.com/careful-what-you-wish-for-lyrics-eminem.html; accessed 2016 08 11.

  • Gert, Bernard. 2005. Morality: Its nature and justification, revised edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girle, Roderic A., David Hitchcock, Peter McBurney, and Bart Verheij. 2003. Decision support for practical reasoning: A theoretical and computational perspective. In Argumentation machines: New frontiers in argumentation and computation, ed. Chris Reed and Timothy J. Norman, 55–83. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The theory of communicative action, Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society, trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press. German original first published in 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, James, Makiko Sato, Pushker Kharecha, David Beerling, Robert Berner, Valerie Masson-Delmotte, Mark Pagani, Maureen Raymo, Dana L. Royer, and James C. Zachos. 2008. Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? The Open Atmospheric Science Journal 2: 217–231. doi:10.2174/1874282300802010217.

  • Hitchcock, David. 2002. Pollock on practical reasoning. Informal Logic 22: 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 1738–1740. A treatise of human nature: being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects. London: John Noon. Retrieved from http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/hume/treat.html; accessed 2016 08 11.

  • Ihnen Jory, Constanza. 2011. Evaluating pragmatic argumentation: A pragma-dialectical perspective. In Proceedings of the 7 th International Conference on Argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Amsterdam, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden and Gordon Mitchell. CD-ROM. Amsterdam: SICSAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals, ed. and trans. Allen W. Wood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. German original first published 1785 and 1786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kock, Christian. 2007. Is practical reasoning presumptive? Informal Logic 27: 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry. 1990. Aimless epistemology? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 21: 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame, Ind : University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John L. 1995. Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Henry S. 1994. Practical reasoning about final ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R. 2001. Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1956. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 63: 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, Karen, and Nikolas Coupland. 1990. Multiple goals in discourse: an overview of issues. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N. 1990. Practical reasoning: Goal-driven, knowledge-based, action-guiding argumentation. Savage. MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N. 1996. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N., Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno, 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weirich, Paul. 2010. Causal decision theory. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/decision-causal/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Hitchcock .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hitchcock, D. (2017). Instrumental Rationality. In: On Reasoning and Argument. Argumentation Library, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics