Abstract
Comprehensive reasoning from end to means requires an initiating intention to bring about some goal, along with five premisses: a specified means would immediately contribute to realization of the goal, the goal is achievable, the means is permissible, no alternative means is preferable, and the side effects do not outweigh the benefits of achieving the goal. Its conclusion is a decision to bring about the means. The scheme can be reiterated until an implementable means is reached. In a particular context, resource limitations may warrant truncation of the reasoning.
Bibliographical note: This chapter was previously published in Argumentation in multi-agent systems: 7th International Workshop, ArgMAS 2010, Toronto, ON, Canada, May 2010: Revised, selected and invited papers. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 6614, ed. Peter McBurney, Iyad Rahwan, and Simon Parsons (Springer, 2011), 1–11. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011. With permission of Springer. I would like to acknowledge helpful comments on my presentation of earlier versions of this chapter at the Seventh International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2010) and at the Seventh Conference on Argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). At the latter conference, comments by Michael Gilbert , Hanns Hohmann , Erik Krabbe , Alain Létourneau and Christof Lumer were particularly helpful. I would also like to acknowledge helpful reviews of the paper by Fabio Paglieri for ISSA and by two anonymous reviewers for ArgMAS 2010.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anscombe, Elizabeth. 1963. Intention, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Aristotle 1984. The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation, Vols. 1–2, ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Atkinson, Katie, and Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 2007 Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artificial Intelligence 171: 855–874. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.009.
Bratman, Michael E. 1987. Intentions, plans and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Castelfranchi, Cristiano, and Fabio Paglieri. 2007. The role of beliefs in goal dynamics: prolegomena to a constructive theory of intentions. Synthese 155: 237–263.
Eminem. 2008. Careful what you wish for lyrics. Retrieved from http://www.metrolyrics.com/careful-what-you-wish-for-lyrics-eminem.html; accessed 2016 08 11.
Gert, Bernard. 2005. Morality: Its nature and justification, revised edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Girle, Roderic A., David Hitchcock, Peter McBurney, and Bart Verheij. 2003. Decision support for practical reasoning: A theoretical and computational perspective. In Argumentation machines: New frontiers in argumentation and computation, ed. Chris Reed and Timothy J. Norman, 55–83. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The theory of communicative action, Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society, trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press. German original first published in 1981.
Hansen, James, Makiko Sato, Pushker Kharecha, David Beerling, Robert Berner, Valerie Masson-Delmotte, Mark Pagani, Maureen Raymo, Dana L. Royer, and James C. Zachos. 2008. Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? The Open Atmospheric Science Journal 2: 217–231. doi:10.2174/1874282300802010217.
Hitchcock, David. 2002. Pollock on practical reasoning. Informal Logic 22: 247–256.
Hume, David. 1738–1740. A treatise of human nature: being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects. London: John Noon. Retrieved from http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/hume/treat.html; accessed 2016 08 11.
Ihnen Jory, Constanza. 2011. Evaluating pragmatic argumentation: A pragma-dialectical perspective. In Proceedings of the 7 th International Conference on Argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Amsterdam, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden and Gordon Mitchell. CD-ROM. Amsterdam: SICSAT.
Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals, ed. and trans. Allen W. Wood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. German original first published 1785 and 1786.
Kock, Christian. 2007. Is practical reasoning presumptive? Informal Logic 27: 91–108.
Laudan, Larry. 1990. Aimless epistemology? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 21: 315–322.
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame, Ind : University of Notre Dame Press.
Pollock, John L. 1995. Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Richardson, Henry S. 1994. Practical reasoning about final ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R. 2001. Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simon, Herbert A. 1956. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 63: 129–138.
Tracy, Karen, and Nikolas Coupland. 1990. Multiple goals in discourse: an overview of issues. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9: 1–13.
Walton, Douglas N. 1990. Practical reasoning: Goal-driven, knowledge-based, action-guiding argumentation. Savage. MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Walton, Douglas N. 1996. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Walton, Douglas N., Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno, 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weirich, Paul. 2010. Causal decision theory. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/decision-causal/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hitchcock, D. (2017). Instrumental Rationality. In: On Reasoning and Argument. Argumentation Library, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53561-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53562-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)