Skip to main content

High Performance Heterogeneous Data Storage System for High Frequency Sensor Data in a Landslide Laboratory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 3469 Accesses

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks can be deployed in landslide prone areas to monitor various geological and weather properties to detect a possible landslide and provide early warning for evacuation. Landslide lab is used to mirror geological conditions of target deployment site for the purposes of testing and perfecting the deployment locations of sensors and associated data models for accurate predictions under various simulated conditions. The landslide lab simulates the full cycle of landslide occurrence on a compact time window of few hours. Hence it’s critical to capture sensor data at very high frequency, ranging from 100 samples to 1000 samples per second to understand all the minute changes to the geological properties leading to landslide occurrence. A typical test scenario using 16 sensors, sampling at 1000 samples per second, running for 8 h would generate 460 million data points. A very finely tuned RDBMS system would take 25 h to store this data at the rate of 5000 records/s at peak i/o rate and even NoSQL data store would not be able to efficiently retrieve this huge volumes of data. We prove that our system outperforms the NoSQL data store by an order of magnitude and the RDBMS data store by two orders of magnitudes in both storage and retrieval of the high frequency sensor data. In this paper we present the architecture, features and performance metrics of our high performance, scalable, and distributed heterogeneous system for data capturing, processing, and retrieval of high frequency sensor data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bonnet P, Gehrke J, Seshadri, P (2001) Towards sensor database systems. In: International conference on mobile data management. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledlie J, Ng C, Holland DA (2005) Provenance-aware sensor data storage. In: 21st international conference on data engineering workshops (ICDEW’05). IEEE, pp 1189–1189

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo C, Lynch JP, Liu M (2013) Distributed reference-free fault detection method for autonomous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 13(5):2009–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni K, Ramanathan N, Chehade MNH, Balzano L, Nair S, Zahedi S, Kohler E, Pottie G, Hansen M, Srivastava M (2009) Sensor network data fault types. ACM Trans Sensor Netw (TOSN) 5(3):25

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan PSMLR (1996) SEQ: design and implementation of a sequence database system

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh MV (2009) Real-time wireless sensor network for landslide detection. In: Third international conference on sensor technologies and applications, 2009. SENSORCOMM’09. IEEE, pp 405–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh MV (2014) Design, development, and deployment of a wireless sensor network for detection of landslides. Ad Hoc Netw 13:2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh MV, Vasudevan N (2012) The deployment of deep-earth sensor probes for landslide detection. Landslides 9(4):457–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiftes N, Dunkels A (2011) A database in every sensor. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems. ACM, pp 316–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen JS, Van der Waaij B, Meijer RJ (2012) Sensor data storage performance: SQL or NoSQL, physical or virtual. In: IEEE 5th international conference on cloud computing (CLOUD). IEEE, pp 431–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Gehrke J (2003) Query processing in sensor networks. In CIDR, pp 233–244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guntha Ramesh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ramesh, G., Balaji, H., Hemalatha, T. (2017). High Performance Heterogeneous Data Storage System for High Frequency Sensor Data in a Landslide Laboratory. In: Mikos, M., Tiwari, B., Yin, Y., Sassa, K. (eds) Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides. WLF 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53498-5_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics