Skip to main content

Understanding Debris Flow Characteristics Using Flume Experiments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides (WLF 2017)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3581 Accesses

Abstract

Confined or channelized debris flow is one of the most powerful processes for transporting solid materials along the mountain torrent. It is defined as a type of mass movement that involves water-charged, predominantly coarse materials flowing rapidly down along a steep confined, pre-existed channel. Development of debris flow is broadly characterized by initiation, transportation, and deposition, depending on channel gradient, and size and gradation of solid mixture. In order to design debris flow control structure, exact measurement of velocity and corresponding impact force are required. Therefore, debris flow flume has been designed in this study to experimentally examine the flow characteristics of debris flow. A 200 mm (W) × 300 mm (H) × 2000 mm (L) flume has been used to conduct the experiments with a flume slope of 25°, 30°, 35°, 40°. Velocity of debris flow was estimated by image analysis of photographs, and runout length and width were measured using grids on deposition pan. Two types of debris mixture have defined, based on the portion of clay, sand, and gravel materials. Experiments showed that velocities of debris flow strongly related to flume slope, ranging 1.5–2.5 m/s. Runout length and width were affected by the flume slope and debris flow composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Coussot P, Meunier M (1996) Recognition, classification and mechanical description of debris flows. Earth Sci Rev 40:209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino V, Cesca M, Marchi L (2010) Field and laboratory investigations of runout distances of debris flows in the Dolomites (Eastern Italian Alps). Geomorphology 115:294–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies TR (1990) Debris-flow surges-experimental simulation. J Hydrol (NZ) 29:18–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairfield G (2011) Assessing the dynamic influences of slope angle and sediment composition on debris flow behaviour: an experimental approach. Ph.D. thesis, Durham University, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Evans S, Bovis M, Hutchinson J (2001) A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type. Environ Eng Geosci 7:221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35:245–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (2015) Scaling and design of landslide and debris-flow experiments. Geomorphology 244:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Berti M (2010) The perfect debris flow? aggregated results from 28 large-scale experiments. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 115(F3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun K-J, Yune C-Y (2015) Analysis of slope hazard triggering factors through field investigation in Korea over the past four years. J Korean Geotech Soc 31(5):47–58 (in Korean)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriguchi S, Borja R, Yashima A, Sawada K (2009) Estimating the impact force generated by granular flow on a rigid obstruction. Acta Geotech 4:57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons JD, Whipple KX, Simoni A (2001) Experimental study of the grain-flow, fluid-mud transition in debris flows. J Geol 109(4):427–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson TC, Costa JE (1987) A rheologic classification of subaerial sediment-water flows. Rev Eng Geol 7:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickenmann D, Zimmermann M (1993) The 1987 debris flows in Switzerland: documentation and analysis. Geomorphology 8:175–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidl C, Chiari M, Kaitna R, Mullegger M, Krawtschuk A, Zimmermann T, Proske D (2013) Analysing debris-flow impact models, based on a small scale modelling approach. Surv Geophys 34:121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (2014) Debris flow: mechanics, prediction and countermeasures. 2nd edn. CRC Press, NL, p 574

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentino R, Barla G, Montrasio L (2008) Experimental analysis and micromechanical modelling of dry granular flow and impacts in laboratory flume tests. Rock Mech Rock Eng 41:153–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the project on “The experimental analysis of debris flow impact force (II),” which was funded by National institute of Forest Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sangjun Im .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Im, S., Eu, S., Kim, D. (2017). Understanding Debris Flow Characteristics Using Flume Experiments. In: Mikos, M., Tiwari, B., Yin, Y., Sassa, K. (eds) Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides. WLF 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53498-5_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics