Advertisement

Large-Scale Synoptic Weather Types and Precipitation Responsible for Landslides in Southern Norway

  • Graziella DevoliEmail author
  • Lisa Jørandli
  • Kolbjørn Engeland
  • Lena M. Tallaksen
Conference paper

Abstract

Open image in new window The contribution of large-scale synoptic weather types to the occurrence of weather-induced landslides was investigated for southern Norway. Landslides from the period 2000–2014 were analyzed on a regional scale, using existing climatic and landslide regionalizations. The classification provides a time series of landslide classes and Kruskal-Wallis tests and chi-tests were conducted to analyze how well the classification performs for each landslide region. The synoptic classification (SynopVis Grosswetterlagen, SVG) of daily weather types was later compared with the precipitation classification. In order to predict the occurrence of landslides within a region, a logistic regression analysis was used where the independent variables were the SVG classes, mean daily rainfall and snowmelt. The results showed that in seven of the twelve landslide regions in southern Norway the SVGs have the highest predictive power in terms of landslide occurrence. In these regions, with the exception of one, the models are significantly better than a null model, and the models are good in predicting weather-induced landslide occurrence. The highest predictive probability of weather-induced landslide occurrence is given by the weather type Zonal Ridge across Central Europe (BM), which yields a 90% probability of weather-induced landslides on the west coast.

Keywords

Synoptic weather types Weather-induced landslides Southern Norway 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Paul James from the Deutcher Wetterdienst (DWD) that provided us the complete SVG dataset from 1871 until the summer of 2015.

References

  1. Andreassen LM, Beldring S, Bjune A, Breili K, Dahl CA, Dyrrdal AV, Isaksen K, Haakenstad H, Haugen JE, Hygen HO, Langehaug HR, Lauritzen S-E, Lawrence D, Melvold K, Mezghani A, Ravndal OR, Risebrobakken B, Roald L, Sande H, Simpson MJR, Skagseth Ø, Skaugen T, Skogen M, Støren EN, Tveito OE, Wong WK (2015) Klima i Norge 2100. In: Hanssen-Bauer I, et al (eds) NCCS report no. 2/2015 (ISSN: 2387-3027), 204 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Devoli G, Dahl M-P (2014) Preliminary regionalization and susceptibility analysis for early warning purposes in Norway. NVE reports no. 37/2014, 52 pGoogle Scholar
  3. Devoli G, Kleivane I, Sund M, Orthe NK, Ekker R, Johnsen E, Colleuille H (2014) Landslide early warning system and web tools for real-time scenarios and for distribution of warning messages in Norway. In: Proceeding of the IAEG 2014, 15–19 September 2014. Torino, Italy, pp 625–629Google Scholar
  4. Dyrrdal AV, Isaksen K, Hygen HO, Meyer NK (2012) Changes in meteorological variables that can trigger natural hazards in Norway. Clim Res 55:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. James PM (2007) An objective classification method for Hess and Brezowsky Grosswetterlagen over Europe. Theor Appl Climatol 88:17–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jørandli L (2016) Landslide occurrence as a response to large-scale synoptic weather types, precipitation and soil saturation in southern Norway. MS thesis, Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990). Finding groups in data—an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  8. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:584–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lacasse S, Nadim F (2009) Landslide risk assessment and mitigation strategy. In: Sassa K, Canuti P (eds) Landslides—disaster risk reduction. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  10. Lied K (2014) Skred: skredfare og sikringstiltak. 256 pGoogle Scholar
  11. Roald LA (2008) Rainfall floods and weather patterns. NVE Report no. 14/2008. 46 pGoogle Scholar
  12. Tveito OE (2010) An assessment of circulation type classifications for precipitation distribution in Norway. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 35:395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. UCLA (2016) R data analysis examples: logit regression (Online). http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/logit.htm. Last accessed 11 Apr 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graziella Devoli
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lisa Jørandli
    • 3
  • Kolbjørn Engeland
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lena M. Tallaksen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeoscienceUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE)OsloNorway
  3. 3.Norconsult ASSandvikaNorway

Personalised recommendations