Skip to main content

Questioning (in)Equality. Insights from a Community Kitchen in a Migrant Squatter Settlement in Greater Lisbon

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Architecture and the Social Sciences

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the concept of justice, addressing Iris Marion Young’s ‘politics of difference’, by analysing a migrant squatter settlement in the periphery of Lisbon. The main goal of this chapter is to search for the ‘five faces of oppression’ and how the construction of a community kitchen minimized oppression and therefore mitigated unjust impacts of urban development. Starting from a broader understanding of architecture, both as a result and research, the theoretical and methodological crossover with other disciplines like anthropology, sociology or political philosophy support the questioning of dominant and alternative practices in the production of space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To summarize her position, Iris Marion Young (1949–2006) was a feminist political philosopher interested in feminist social theory, theories of justice and democratic theory.

  2. 2.

    A precarious settlement, comparable to what is perceived as a ‘shantytown’.

  3. 3.

    Suburbanisation in Lisbon led to two main configurations of ‘illegal genesis’. In most cases, owners of the land (in joint ownership) erected unlicensed constructions on their ‘lot’, usually in non-urban areas. Reasons and motivations are well described in the work of Craveiro (2010). A reverse situation, more seldom, shows that other areas were self-produced from the occupation of and subsequent construction on public or private land. In the first case, and since dwellers had property rights, the commitment was to proceed to “urban reconversion”, a manifest for the legal fetishism described by Azuela in these types of processes (2004). As for the second condition, occupations resulted in resettlements mainly framed within the PER (Slum Relocation Programme), a public housing programme. Some of those processes started as far back as the 1990s and are still unconcluded.

  4. 4.

    The PER led to a strong debate prior to its implementation. Evictions, displacements and a general reflection on the fact that this type of urban form, both on the macro and micro scale, was inadequate to accommodate inhabitants from ‘bairros de lata’ was a concern for many urban planners. Guerra (1994) wrote a special number of ‘Sociedade e Território’ a journal of urban and regional studies, dedicated to the PER, stating that ‘People are not things one can put in drawers’ [translation by the author].Years later, execution of the PER was also criticized in the works of Cachado (2008, 2013).

  5. 5.

    For a deeper understanding of representation issues, the PER housing programme and ‘bairros de barracas’, see the work of Braga et al. (2015) regarding the confrontation of urban policies and urban planning with artistic interventions in Quinta da Vitória, a migrant squatter settlement in the periphery of Lisbon.

  6. 6.

    Translated from the project summary found at http://fronteirasurbanas.ie.ul.pt/?p=14, visited on December 15th 2015.

  7. 7.

    Fab Lab stands for Fabrication Laboratory. Fab Labs are a global network of local labs focused on digital fabrication. Regardless of the potential to empower individuals or communities to co-create objects in an open-source, democratic way, in the case of Terras da Costa a low tech solution was closer to existing practices of building resistance.

  8. 8.

    Between November 2014 and May 2015, the exhibition presented design proposals for six of the world’s megacities made by teams of architects, advocating for change in terms of spatial production and questioning the scope of profession.

  9. 9.

    Batuque is a Cape Verdean musical genre and dance associated with the culture of the island of Santiago, where most of the inhabitants of Terras da Costa are from. It is not exclusively but typically performed by women. The group sits in a circle, called ‘terreru’, on the street, at home, at a party. While one woman dances, the others sing and play the ‘chabeta’, a flap of cloth wrapped usually in a piece of leather or a plastic bag.

References

  • Awan, N., Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2011). Spatial agency: Other ways of doing architecture. Abingdon, Oxon [England] ; New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azuela, A. (2004). Illegal logging and local democracy: Between communitarianism and legal fetishism. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 19(1–3), 81–96. doi:10.1300/J091v19n01_05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell Jones, P., Petrescu, D., & Till, J. (Eds.). (2005). Architecture and participation. New York: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, J. (2015). Participatory aesthetics and makeshift urbanism: Cases of Guimarães, Cova do Vapor, and Terras da Costa. In Participatory urbanisms—an anthology (pp. 129–146). Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, J., Lages, J., & Veiga, I. (2015). Quinta da Vitória, when the demolition blossoms: Artistic interventions towards the construction of a just city. Projects for an inclusive city—Social integration through urban growth strategies (pp. 136–156). City of Skopje: Skopje.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (Ed.). (2014). Implosions—explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2015, March 24). Is ‘Tactical Urbanism’ an alternative to neoliberal urbanism? POST—notes on modern and contemporary art around the globe. http://post.at.moma.org/content_items/587-is-tactical-urbanism-an-alternative-to-neoliberal-urbanism

  • Cachado, R. A. (2008). Poverty political discourse and its effects—Portuguese hindus between shanty town and the social housing estate. Mundos Urbanos e Contemporaneidade, 3, 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachado, R. A. (2013). O Programa Especial de Realojamento. Ambiente histórico, político e social. Análise Social, XLVIII(206), 134–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Câmara Municipal de Almada. (2014). Território e População - Retrato de Almada segundo os Censos 2011. Almada: Divisão de Estudos e Planeamento, Departamento de Planeamento Urbanístico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, R., & Breda-Vázquez, I. (2007). Social justice as a guide to planning theory and practice: Analyzing the Portuguese planning system. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), 384–400. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00729.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craveiro, M. T. (2010). Do ‘Bairro Clandestino’ às ‘Áreas de Génese Ilegal’ - um problema que permanece em Portugal. In L. M. M. Bógus, S. Pasternak, & I. Raposo (Eds.), Da irregularidade fundiária urbana à regularização: análise comparativa Brasil-Portugal (pp. 33–61). São Paulo: Edições PUC-SP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupers, K., & Miessen, M. (2012). Participation and/or criticality? Thoughts on an architectural practice for urban change. In J. Crisman (Ed.), Socio (Vol. 40). Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Forum for Urban Security. (2013). Security, democracy and cities: The manifesto of Aubervilliers and Saint-Denis. Paris: European Forum for Urban Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2009). Spatial justice and planning. Spatial Justice/Justice Spatiale, (1). http://www.jssj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/JSSJ1-5en1.pdf

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2013). Planificación, Justicia y Ciudad. Urban NS06 - Teoría urbana: estados del arte/Urban Theory: States of the art, (06), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, I. (1994). As Pessoas não são Coisas que se Ponham em Gavetas. Sociedade e Território, 20, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardoon, D. (2017). An Economy for the 99%. London: Oxfam International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolowratnik, N. V., & Miessen, M. (2012). Waking up from the nightmare of participation. Utrecht: Expodium ; MaHKU, Utrecht Graduate School of Visual Art and Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1970). La Révolution urbaine. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1974). La Production de l’espace. Paris: Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, M. (2015). Tactical urbanism. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, M., Bartman, D., Garcia, T., Preston, R., & Woudstra, R. (2012). Tactical urbanism (Vol. 2). New York: The Street Plans Collaborative. http://issuu.com/streetplanscollaborative/docs/tactical_urbanism_vol_2_final

  • Lydon, M., Bartman, D., Khawarzad, A., & Woudstra, R. (2011). Tactical urbanism (Vol. 1). New York: The Street Plans Collaborative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malheiros, J. M., & Fonseca, L. (Eds.). (2011). Acesso à habitação e problemas residenciais dos imigrantes em Portugal. Lisboa: Alto Comissariado para a Imigração e diálogo intercultural.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M. (2010). Social movements in the (Post-)Neoliberal City. London: Bedford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, M., Magano, O., & Candeias, P. (2014). Estudo nacional sobre as comunidades ciganas. Lisboa: Alto Comissariado para as Migrações.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, M. (Ed.). (2014). Fronteiras Urbanas - Ensaios sobre a humanização do espaço. Lisboa: Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.  

    Google Scholar 

  • Miessen, M. (2007). The violence of participation. Berlin; New York: Sternberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, P., & Campos Costa, P. (2013, Maio). Noutra Costa da Caparica. JA - Jornal dos Arquitectos (247), 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London, New York: Routledge.  

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswalt, P., Overmeyer, K., & Misselwitz, P. (2013). Urban catalyst: The power of temporary use. Berlin: Dom Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raposo, I. (2011). Relatório final do projecto de investigação: PTDC/AUR/71721/2006 - Reconversão e reinserção urbana de bairros de génese ilegal. Avaliação socio-urbanística e soluções integradas de planeamento estratégico. Lisboa: Centro de Investigação em Arquitectura, Urbanismo e Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, J. C. (2010). Migration, sodade and conciliation: Cape Verdean batuque practice in Portugal. Migrações Journal—Special Issue Music and Migration, 7, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgueiro, T. B. (1977). Bairros Clandestinos na perifieria de Lisboa. Finisterra, 12(23), 29–55. doi:10.18055/Finis2281

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2011). Response to Kurt Iveson: ‘Social or Spatial Justice? Marcuse and Soja on the Right to the City’. City, 15(2), 260–262. doi:10.1080/13604813.2011.568719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulumello, S. (2014). Local policies for urban security and spatial planning in the Lisbon metropolitan area: The Cases of Lisbon, Cascais and Barreiro municipalities. Lisbon: Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA. (2007). Unleashing the potential of urban growth. New York, NY: UNFPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2004). Decivilizing and demonizing: The remaking of the black American ghetto. In S. Loyal & S. Quilley (Eds.), The sociology of Norbert Elias (pp. 95–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Joana Pestana Lages acknowledges support from the grant SFRH/BD/80806/2011 awarded the Portuguese funding institution FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia. It is also acknowledged the support of the urban researchers Joana Braga and Ana Catarino, as well as all dwellers from Terras da Costa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Pestana Lages .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lages, J.P. (2017). Questioning (in)Equality. Insights from a Community Kitchen in a Migrant Squatter Settlement in Greater Lisbon. In: Manuela Mendes, M., Sá, T., Cabral, J. (eds) Architecture and the Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53477-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53477-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53476-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53477-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics