Abstract
The consequences of involuntary childlessness in developing countries (DCs) create more wide-ranging societal problems compared to Western societies, particularly for women. Because many families in developing countries completely depend on children for economic survival, childlessness has to be regarded as a social and public health issue and not only as an individual medical problem. These negative psychosocial and economical consequences for childless couples are often severe and underestimated by the local and international society. In The Walking Egg Project, we strive to raise awareness surrounding childlessness in resource-poor countries and to make infertility care in all its aspects, including assisted reproductive technologies, available and accessible for a much larger part of the world population. We hope to achieve this goal through innovation and research, advocacy and networking, training and capacity building and service delivery. Right from the start, the Walking Project has approached the problem of infertility in a multidisciplinary and global manner. It gathers medical, social, ethical, epidemiological, juridical and economical scientists and experts along with artists and philosophers to discuss and work together towards its goal. We realize that universal access to infertility care can only be achieved when good quality but affordable infertility care is linked to effective family planning and safe motherhood programmes. Only a global project with respect to sociocultural, ethical, economical and political differences can be successful.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1506–12.
Mascarenhas M, Flaxman S, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLOS Med. 2012;9:e1001356. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356.
Cates W, Farley TM, Rowe PJ. Worldwide patterns of infertility: is Africa different?’. Lancet. 1985;2(8455):596–8.
World Health Organisation. Infections, pregnancies and infertility: perspectives on prevention. Fertil Steril. 1987;47:944–9.
Ericksen K, Brunette T. Patterns and predictors of infertility among African women: a cross-national survey of twenty-seven nations. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(2):209–20.
Kuku SF, Osegbe ND. Oligo/ azoospermia in Nigeria. Arch Androl. 1989;22:233–7.
Nachtigall RD. International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:871–85.
Murage A, Muteshi MC, Githae F. Assisted reproduction services provision in a developing country: time to act? Fertil Steril. 2011;96:966–8.
Greil AL. Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45:1679–704.
Papreen N, Sharma A, Sabin K, Begum L, Ahsan SK, Baqui AH. Living with infertility: experiences among Urban slum populations in Bangladesh. Reprod Health Matters. 2000;8:33–44.
Van Balen F, Gerrits T. Quality of infertility care in poor-resource areas and the introduction of new reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:215–9.
Daar AS, Merali Z. Infertility and social suffering: the case of ART in developing countries. In: Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD, editors. Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 15–21.
Dyer SJ, Abrahams N, Hoffman M, van der Spuy ZM. ‘Men leave me as I cannot have children’: women’s experiences with involuntary childlessness. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1663–8.
Dyer SJ, Abrahams N, Hoffman M, Van der Spuy ZM. Infertility in South Africa: women’s reproductive health knowledge and treatment-seeking behaviour for involuntary childlessness. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1657–62.
Dyer SJ, Abrahams N, Mokoena NE, Van der Spuy ZM. “You are a man because you have children”: experiences, reproductive health knowledge and treatment-seeking behaviour among men suffering from couple infertility in South Africa. Hum Reprod. 2004;960–7.
Dyer SJ, Abrahams N, Mokoena NE, Lombard CJ, Van der Spuy ZM. Psychological distress among women suffering from couple infertility in South Africa: a quantitative assessment. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1938–43.
Van Balen F, Bos HMW. The social and cultural consequences of being childless in poor-resource areas. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2009;1:106–21.
Gerrits T, Shaw M. Biomedical infertility care in sub-Saharan Africa: a social science review of current practices, experiences and viewpoints. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010;2:194–207.
Ombelet W, Cooke I, Dyer S, Serour G, Devroey P. Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:605–21.
Dhont N. Clinical, epidemiological and socio-cultural aspects of infertility in resource-poor settings. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011;3:77–88.
Ombelet W. Global access to infertility care in developing countries: a case of human rights, equity and social justice. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011;3:257–66.
Ombelet W. Is global access to infertility care realistic? The Walking Egg project. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28:267–72.
Inhorn M. Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: illustrations from Egypt. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:1837–51.
Brocklehurst P, French R. The association between maternal HIV infection and perinatal outcome: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:836–48.
Glynn JR, Buvé A, Caraël M, Kahindo M, Macauley IB, Musonda RM, et al. Decreased fertility among HIV-1-infected women attending antenatal clinics in three African cities. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000;25:345–52.
Dhont N, Muvunyi C, Luchters S, Vyankandondera J, De Naeyer L, Temmerman M, et al. HIV infection and sexual behaviour in primary and secondary infertile relationships: a case–control study in Kigali, Rwanda. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87:28–34.
Nabaitu J, Bachengana C, Seeley J. Marital instability in a rural population in south-west Uganda: implications for the spread of HIV-1 infection. Africa (Lond). 1994;64:243–51.
Fathalla MF, Sinding SW, Rosenfield A, Fathalla MM. Sexual and reproductive health for all: a call for action. Lancet. 2006;368:2095–100.
Guilhem D. New reproductive technologies, ethics and legislation in Brazil: a delayed debate. Bioethics. 2011;15:218–30.
Ombelet W, Campo R. Affordable IVF for developing countries. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15:257–65.
Pennings G. Ethical issues of infertility treatment in developing countries. Hum Reprod. ESHRE Monographs. 2008;15–20.
Pennings G, de Wert G, Shenfield F, Cohen J, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. Providing infertility treatment in resource-poor countries. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1008–11. doi:10.1093/humrep/den503.
Ombelet W, Campo R, Frydman R, Huyser C, Nargund G, Sallam H et al. The Arusha project: Accessible infertility care in developing countries—a reasonable option? Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010; 107–15.
Ombelet W, Campo R, Franken D, Huyser C, Nargund G. The Walking Egg project: an example of medical education and training. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012; 66–75.
Huyser C, Fourie J. Sperm only please: Prevention of infections in an assisted reproduction laboratory in a developing country. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010; 97–106.
World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
Ombelet W, Vandeput H, Van de Putte G, Cox A, Janssen M, Jacobs P, et al. Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology? Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1458–63.
Campo R, Molinas CR, Rombauts L, Mestdagh G, Lauwers M, Braekmans P, et al. Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:258–63.
Gnoth C, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G. Opinion: natural family planning and the management of infertility. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2002;267:67–71.
Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, Frank-Hermann P, Freundl G. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1959–66.
Ombelet W, Deblaere K, Bosmans E, Cox A, Jacobs P, Janssen M, et al. Semen quality and intrauterine insemination. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:485–92.
Verhulst SM, Cohlen BJ, Hughes E, te Velde E, Heineman MJ. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;4:CD001838.
Gleicher N, Oleske DM, Tur-Kaspa I, Vidali A, Karande V. Reducing the risk of high-order multiple pregnancy after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:2–7.
Frydman R, Ranoux C. INVO: a simple, low cost effective assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod. 2008;85–9.
Van Blerkom J, Manes C. Development of preimplantation rabbit embryos in vivo and in vitro. II. A comparison of qualitative aspects of protein synthesis. Devel Biol. 1974;40:40–51.
Swain JE. A self-contained culture platform using carbon dioxide produced from a chemical reaction supports mouse blastocyst development. In Vitro J Reprod Dev. 2011;57:551–5.
Verberg MF, Macklon NS, Nargund G, Frydman R, Devroey P, Broekmans FJ et al. Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:13–29.
Nargund G, Waterstone J, Bland JM, Philips Z, Parsons J, Campbell S. Cumulated conception and live birth rates in natural (unstimulated) IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:259–62.
Ingerslev HJ, Hojgaard A, Hindkjaer J, Kesmodel U. A randomized study comparing IVF in the unstimulated cycle with IVF following clomiphene citrate. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:696–702.
Nargund G, Fauser BC, Macklon NS, Ombelet W, Nygren K, Frydman R. Rotterdam ISMAAR consensus group on terminology for ovarian stimulation for IVF. The ISMAAR proposal on terminology for ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2801–4.
Kato K, Takehara Y, Segawa T, Kawachiya S, Okuno T, Kobayashi T, et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy: age-specific results of a large, single-centre, Japanese cohort. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:35.
Rojanasakul A, Choktanasiri W, Suchartwatanachai C, Srisombut C, Chinsomboon S. Chatasingh. ‘Simplified IVF’: program for developing countries. J Med Assoc Thai. 1994;77:12–8.
Sallam HN. Infertility in developing countries: funding the project. Hum Reprod ESHRE Monographs. 2008;97–101.
Ombelet W, Van Blerkom J, Janssen M, Dhont N, Mestdagh G, Nargund G, et al. The TWE-lab simplified IVF procedure: First births after freezing/thawing. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014;6:45–9.
Ombelet W. The Walking Egg project: universal access to infertility care-from dream to reality. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2013;5:161–75.
Acknowledgements
I gratefully acknowledge all the experts who were involved in The Walking Egg Project since many years (Rudi Campo, Nathalie Dhont, Danie Franken, Trudie Gerrits, Carin Huyser, Geeta Nargund, Guido Pennings, Hassan Sallam, Frank Van Balen, Jonathan Van Blerkom, Sheryl Vanderpoel, Annie Vereecken, Koen Vanmechelen and many others).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Addendum 1: The TWE-Lab Simplified IVF Procedure Method
Addendum 1: The TWE-Lab Simplified IVF Procedure Method
The TWE-lab system is based on a simple chemical reaction in a closed environment which removes the need for an expensive IVF laboratory with CO2 incubators, medical gas supply and air purification systems. CO2 is necessary to equilibrate the pH of the IVF culture medium to a value between 7.25 and 7.40, optimal for embryo development. Continuous culture at 37 °C is necessary for viability of the embryo and can be achieved by an incubator, heated box or warm water bath. The simplified IVF method uses 2 chemicals, citric acid and sodium bicarbonate, to produce the CO2 necessary to adjust the pH. The TWE-lab system was designed in collaboration with Jonathan Van Blerkom and is now a standardized procedure to perform an IVF treatment, for which all materials are available in a compact ready-to-use kit. The simplified IVF method uses 2 glass tubes in which the first tube serves as the generator of CO2 by a chemical reaction between citric acid and sodium bicarbonate to produce the CO2 for equilibration of the culture medium in the second tube (Fig. 20.4). A connection between the tubes is established by needles and tubing to transport the produced gas from the generator tube to the tube with culture medium. The connection can easily be removed after the 24-h equilibration of the culture medium has completed. The tubes with culture medium can be used immediately, or they can be stored in a cold (2–8 °C) environment. To keep warm, the tubes are placed in a heated block (alternatively water bath or simple incubator without the need for a gas supply) at 37 °C. After oocytes have been harvested from the follicles, they are inserted individually in the equilibrated tubes using a 1-ml syringe and needle, without opening the tube or disturbing the air environment inside the tube. The TWE-lab system provides a closed environment to ensure stable culture conditions and protect the gametes and embryos from possible adverse external effects. Between 1000 and 10,000 sperm cells are injected in a similar way to the tubes to inseminate the oocytes. After 24 h, fertilization is assessed by keeping the tubes at a slant and looking through the glass walls at the oocytes to see the 2 pronuclei that are a sign of sperm protrusion. Fertilization and embryo development are assessed through the glass walls of the tube. This simplified method removes the need for expensive air control systems and gives a very stable and safe environment for embryos to develop. The search for the materials needed in the kit has been extensive, and all items have important specifications that ensure good operation of the low-cost IVF method. Changing as little as the tube or the needle can result in a complete loss of function of the TWE-lab system.
Outcomes from the low-cost culture method were compared with those from a conventional IVF culture system in a study conducted at the IVF unit in Genk Belgium and were shown to be identical [45]. As we performed the study in routine IVF cycles, surplus embryos were frozen and these from the TWE-lab system that were thawed and replaced have also led to the birth of healthy children [54]. These studies prove the TWE-lab system to be an alternative low-cost system for a routine IVF procedure. Next step is to implement the TWE-lab IVF system in a centre that is limited in resources. Our goal is to open the first low-cost TWE-lab centres in two African countries in 2015.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ombelet, W. (2017). Accessible Infertility Care: From Dream to Reality. In: Chian, RC., Nargund, G., Huang, J. (eds) Development of In Vitro Maturation for Human Oocytes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53454-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53454-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53452-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53454-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)