Advertisement

Economy of Thought: A Neglected Principle of Mathematics Education

  • Alexandre V. BorovikEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics, Culture, and the Arts book series (MACUAR)

Abstract

The aim of science is to seek the simplest explanations of complex facts. We are apt to fall into the error of thinking that the facts are simple because simplicity is the goal of our quest. The guiding motto in the life of every natural philosopher should be, “Seek simplicity and distrust it.”

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank my mathematics homeschooler colleagues Maria Droujkova (see her book [24]) and Julia Brodsky—their heroism is a source of inspiration for me, and this paper is written with them as readers in mind. Maria Droujkova’s new project, Avoid Hard Work!, [16], focuses on simplicity as a guiding principle of mathematics education.

I am grateful to Roman Kossak and Philip Ording, the initiators and editors of this volume, for their patience and persistence.

Ron Aharoni, Natasha Artemeva, John Baldwin, Rick Booth, Julia Brodsky, Ronald Brown, David Corfield, Yagmur Denizhan, Maria Droujkova, Julian Gilbey, Daniel S. Helman, Roman Kossak, Brendan Larvor, Josef Lauri, Azadeh Neman, David Pierce, Wes Raikowski, Peter Ransom, Carlos Santacruz, Seb Schmoller, Anna Sfard, Chris Stephenson, Natasa Strabic, Adam Sulich, Yusuf Ünlü, and the anonymous referee provided most useful feedback and corrections. Tony Gardiner kindly corrected my translation of a fragment from Igor Arnold’s paper.

Some parts of the paper were written thanks to my involvement with CMEP, the Cambridge Mathematics Education Project. I thank my CMEP colleagues, and especially Martin Hyland and Tony Gardiner, for many useful discussions—but neither they nor CMEP are responsible for my views expressed here.

This paper was completed when I enjoyed the warm hospitality offered to me in the Nesin Mathematics Village13 in Şirince, Izmir Province, Turkey; my thanks go to Ali Nesin and to all volunteers and staff who have made the Village a mathematics research paradise, an oasis of proper mathematics education, and a garden of philosophy and arts [1, 19]. Simplicity is the cultural dominant of the Village.

References

  1. 1.
    Alladi, Krishnaswami, and Gabriela A. R. Nesin. “The Nesin Mathematics Village in Turkey.” Notices of American Mathematical Society 62 (2015): 652–658.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnold, I. V. “Principles of selection and composition of arithmetic problems.” In Russian. Izvesiya APN RSFSR 6 (1946): 8–28.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arnold, I. V.. Principles of selection and composition of arithmetic problems. In Russian. Moscow: MCNMO, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arnold, V. I. “On teaching mathematics.” Russian Mathematical Surveys 53, no. 1 (1998): 229–236.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borovik, Alexandre “‘Free Maths Schools’: some international parallels.” The De Morgan Journal 2, no. 2 (2012): 23–35.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arnold, V. I.. “Relationality of teaching, the Khan Academy, and word problems.” Selected Passages From Correspondence With Friends 1, no. 6 (2013): 45–50. http://www.borovik.net/selecta/ Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arnold, V. I.. “The strange fate of abstract thinking.” Selected Passages From Correspondence With Friends 1, no. 3 (2013): 9–12. http://www.borovik.net/selecta/ Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arnold, V. I.. “Calling a spade a spade: Mathematics in the new pattern of division of labour.” In Mathematical Cultures: The London Meetings 2012–14. Edited by B. Larvor. Switzerland: Birkhäuser, 2016.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arnold, V. I.. “Didactic Transformation.” Selected Passages From Correspondence With Friends 4, no. 1 (2016): 1–8. http://www.borovik.net/selecta/ MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arnold, V. I.. “The Golden Age of Soviet mathematics education: The Ponzi scheme of social mobility.” In preparation.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Borovik, Alexandre, and Ş Yalçınkaya. “Adjoint representations of black box groups \(\mathrm{PSL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{q})\).” Preprint. 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.06374.
  12. 12.
    Brodsky, Julia. “Bright, Brave, Open minds—encouraging young children in math inquiry.” Natural Math, 2015.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheney, Dorothy L., and Robert M. Seyfarth, Baboon Metaphysics: The Evolution of a Social Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corry, Leo. “Writing the Ultimate Mathematical Textbook: Nicolas Bourbaki’s Éléments de mathématique.” The Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics. Edited by Eleanor Robson and Jacqueline Stedall. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dehaene, Stanislas. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Droujkova, Maria, James Tanton, and Yelena McManaman. In preparation.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gardiner, Anthony D. “Teaching mathematics at secondary level.” The De Morgan Gazette 6, no. 1 (2014) 1–215.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Havers, Grant N. Lincoln and the Politics of Christian Love. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karaali, Gizem. “Nesin Math Village: Mathematics as a Revolutionary Act.” The Mathematical Intelligencer 36, no. 2 (2014): 45–49.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kolmogoroff, A. N. Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Berlin: Springer, 1933.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krutetskii, V. A. The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lemme, Monsieur. “Utter elitism: French mathematics and the system of classes prépas.” The De Morgan Journal 2, no. 2 (2012): 5–22.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lui, S. H. “An Interview with Vladimir Arnold.” Notices of American Mathematical Society 44, no. 4 (1997): 432–438.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McManaman, Yelena, and Maria Droujkova. Moebius Noodles: Adventurous Math for the Playground Crowd. Cary, NC: Delta Stream Media, 2013.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morrissey, C. S. “Spielberg’s Lincoln: Politics as Mathematics.” The Catholic World Report 19 (2012).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rosenfeld, Malke, and Gordon Hamilton. Socks Are Like Pants, Cats Are Like Dogs: Games, Puzzles & Activities for Choosing, Identifying & Sorting Math! Cary, NC: Delta Stream Media, an imprint of Natural Math, 2016.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Russell, Bertrand, and Alfred North Whitehead. Principia Mathematica, Volume I-III, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1910, 1912, 1913.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schrader, Yu. Equality, Similarity, Order. In Russian. Nauka, 1971.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sfard, Anna. “On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects a different sides of the same coin.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, no. 1 (1991): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schrader, Yu.. “Objectifying symbols: The uneasy journey of the mathematical ‘signified’ from the world, to mind, to discourse.” Preprint. 2016.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sinkevich, Galina, I. “History of the concept of uniform continuity and the idea of coverings of a segment.” In Russian. History of Science and Technology 4 (2016): 3–17.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weil, André. “Sur les espaces à structure uniforme et sur la topologie générale.” Act. Sci. Ind. 551 (1937): 3–40.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weller, Kirk et al. “Intimations of infinity.” Notices of the American Mathematical Society 51, no. 7 (2004): 741–750.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Whitehead, Alfred North. The Aims of Education and Other Essays. New York: Macmillan Company, 1929.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MathematicsUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations