Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Mathematics, Culture, and the Arts ((MACUAR))

  • 1270 Accesses

Abstract

In The Continuum, Hermann Weyl notes (Weyl, The Continuum: A Critical Examination of the Foundations of Analysis. Dover Books, Mineola, 1994):

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In twelve-tone music, the underlying structural unit is an ordering of the twelve notes in the scale (the “tone row”), which is acted on by a permutation group (the “tone group,” generated by inversion, transposition and retrograde).

  2. 2.

    The row is subdivided into sets {C , E♭, D}, {B, F , F, E}, {B♭, A♭, A}, {G, C}. The overall form is P 0I 9RI 9I 4RI 4P 0Coda. I 9 and RI 9 are the only row operations that preserve two blocks ({C , E♭, D} and {B♭, A♭, A}) from the initial partition, and I 4, RI 4 are the only operations that preserve a single block ({B♭, A♭, A}) common to I 9 and RI 9. This method of dividing the row into pitch sets and looking for invariance under row operations is characteristic of late Webern, though it was never employed in such a logically reductive manner.

  3. 3.

    Schoenberg, who developed the twelve-tone method in the 1920s, sometimes describes twelve-tone music as an undirected space of relations, untethered from the tonal notion of a root. In Style and Idea, he writes “All that happens at any point of this musical space has more than a local effect. It functions not only in its own plane, but also in all other directions and planes, and is not without influence even at remote points…there is no absolute down, no right or left, forward or backward. Every musical configuration, every movement of tones has to be comprehended primarily as a mutual relation of sounds” [15, p. 109].

  4. 4.

    These are collected in An Anthology, a classic document of the early 1960s New York avant-garde edited by Young.

  5. 5.

    The initial Harvard performance was organized by Henry Flynt, and carried out by Young and Robert Morris. See Curtis [3, p. 89].

  6. 6.

    For instance, an octave is assigned the frequency ratio 2:1, a fifth 3:2, a fourth 4:3. Less familiar intervals such as 28:27, 49:48, and 64:63, which are normally heard only as overtones of a fundamental, also play an important role in Young’s music.

  7. 7.

    Young draws a number of interesting conclusions from this view, for instance the impossibility of tuning an equal-tempered tritone, whose frequency ratio is \(\sqrt{2}: 1\).

  8. 8.

    In fact, there have been five different versions of Trio. The 1958 version, three just intonation versions (1984, 2001, 2005), and most recently (2015) a three hour tuned version based on Young’s original sketches for the piece.

  9. 9.

    Although distinct from Conceptual Art of the later 1960s, it is interesting to note Flynt’s connection to the genre. Flynt is part of the artistic circle of Robert Morris and Walter de Maria at this time, and each contribute to An Anthology (Flynt’s contribution is Concept Art). Flynt notes “there was a milieu which may have consisted only of Young, Morris, myself, and one or two others, which was never chronicled in art history” [5, p. 2].

  10. 10.

    For instance, Flynt’s Each Point On This Line Is A Composition (1961) appears to be a specifically foundational interpretation of Young’s Composition #9 1960, in which a line is printed on a notecard.

  11. 11.

    Flynt later expresses this system in more familiar logical notation, stipulating “an associated ratio is a sentence,” an “axiom is the first sentence one sees,” and “sentence A implies sentence B if the associated ratio of B is the next smallest ratio of all sentences you see” [6, p. 24].

  12. 12.

    Flynt believes this new framework simplifies issues surrounding the continuity of perception in Illusion-Ratios, and subsequently the cardinality of its language.

  13. 13.

    Translation from Hesseling [14, p. 140].

  14. 14.

    The then current offshoot of twelve-tone music, where rhythm, duration, timbre, etc. are acted on by the permutation group.

  15. 15.

    In these pieces, rationally tuned sine tones gradually go in and out of phase. Although Young refers to “tuning as a function of time” as one of his key theoretical constructs, it is interesting to note this philosophy may in part have stemmed from technological limitations of the time. In works such as Dream House (1969) Young envisions sustaining tuned intervals for weeks or longer by electronic means. However, the realization of such works proved difficult due to the instability of commercially available oscillators of the time. EMS had recently purchased phase-locked oscillators, which Young was interested in testing.

  16. 16.

    More generally, choice sequences can be understood in terms of spreads. A spread consists of a spread law Λ M , which is a lawlike characteristic function on \(\mathbb{N}^{<\mathbb{N}}\), and a complementary law Γ M which assigns a mathematical object to each finite sequence 〈a 1, a 2, . . a n 〉 such that Λ M (〈a 1, , a n 〉) = 1. See Hesseling [14, p. 65].

  17. 17.

    Although the title is suggestive of a finite process, Hennix refers to the piece as infinitary. She envisions it to be composed of three infinitely sustained sine tones [9, p. 2].

  18. 18.

    For instance, a finite sequence like (1,0,0,1,0) would indicate which harmonics were detected as present or absent, based on some enumeration of all harmonics of the fundamental. Hennix has more recently remarked that she associates the intuitive continuum with the spectrum of the tambura, the basic acoustical reference for Young’s music since the 1970s.

References

  1. Brouwer, L. E. J. Collected Works 1. Philosophy and Foundations of Mathematics. Edited by A. Heyting. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1975.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Carnap, Rudolph. The Logical Syntax Of Language. New York: Routledge, 2010.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Curtis, Charles. “The Position of the Observer: Regarding The Compositions 1960.” ± 1961: Founding the Expanded Arts. Madrid, Spain: Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flynt, Henry. “Concept Art.” In An Anthology of Chance Operations, edited by La Monte Young. New York: La Monte Young and Jackson Maclow, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brouwer, L. E. J.. “The Crystallization of Concept Art in 1961.” Last modified 1994. http://www.henryflynt.org/meta_tech/crystal.html.

  6. Brouwer, L. E. J.. “Mathematics, Tokenetics, and Uncanny Calculi: 1961 Concept Art in Retrospect.” Last modified 1996. http://www.henryflynt.org/meta_tech/token.html.

  7. Brouwer, L. E. J.. “Christer Hennix, The Electric Harpsichord.” In The Electric Harpsichord, book edited by Christer Hennix to accompany The Electric Harpsichord. Christer Hennix. Die Schachtel DSA10. CD. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brouwer, L. E. J.. 2011 Concept Art 50 Years. Berlin, Germany: Grimmuseum, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hennix, Catherine Christer. Revisiting Brouwer’s Lattice 30 Years Later. Unpublished manuscript, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brouwer, L. E. J.. The Hilbert Space Shruti Box. Unpublished manuscript, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hennix, Christer. Brouwer’s Lattice. Stockholm, Sweden: Moderna Museet, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brouwer, L. E. J.. “The Yellow Book.” In Being = Space × Action, edited by Charles Stein. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brouwer, L. E. J.. “The Philosophy of Concept Art: An Interview With Henry Flynt.” In Being = Space × Action, edited by Charles Stein. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hesseling, Dennis. Gnomes in the Fog: The Recpetion of Brouwer’s Intuitionism in the 1920s. Basel: Birkhauser, 2003.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Schoenberg, Arnold. Style and Idea. New York: Philosophical Library, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weyl, Hermann. The Continuum: A Critical Examination of the Foundations of Analysis. Mineola, NY: Dover Books, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Young, La Monte and Marian Zazeela. Selected Writings. Munich: Heiner Friedrich, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spencer Gerhardt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gerhardt, S. (2017). Minimalism and Foundations. In: Kossak, R., Ording, P. (eds) Simplicity: Ideals of Practice in Mathematics and the Arts. Mathematics, Culture, and the Arts. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53385-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics