Advertisement

The Fluidity of Simplicity: Philosophy, Mathematics, Art

  • Juliet FloydEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics, Culture, and the Arts book series (MACUAR)

Abstract

Simplicity is not simple. It wears many faces, and stands for a host of factors we use in argumentation. In the following narrative, the notion will not be analyzed. Instead, a parade of different observations about simplicity will be run through, drawing on philosophy, mathematics, and art. This run-through is designed to allow a certain ideal of simplicity to emerge. This ideal, as it happens, has been explicitly adhered to by a wide variety of modern thinkers: philosophers, mathematicians, and artists. Our aim is to characterize it.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper would not have come to be without numerous conversations, exhibitions, and lecture opportunities afforded me, above all by Juliette Kennedy. In addition, I thank the participants and audience at the CUNY Graduate Center Conference on “Simplicity: Ideals of Practice in Mathematics & the Arts,” April 4, 2013, as well as the co-organizers with Juliette, Roman Kossak, and Philip Ording. Early versions of this paper were given at the symposium “Aesthetics and Mathematics,” organized by Juliette Kennedy, Rosalie Iemhoff, and Albert Visser at Utrecht University, 10 November 2007 in conjunction with the exhibition at the Mondriaanhuis, Logic Unfettered—European and American Abstraction Now; at the American Academy of Berlin, October 27, 2008; at the PhiMSAMP conference “Is Mathematics Special?” held at the University of Vienna, May 17, 2008; at the Paris VIII seminar of Antonia Soulez, “Intentionnel/Intentionnel devant les régles,” May 13, 2009; and at the Annual Nordic Wittgenstein Society Meeting, Stavanger, Norway May 30, 2015. I am grateful to the members of the audiences on these occasions for their comments, as well as to the students in my spring 2016 Wittgenstein seminar at Boston University. Helpful comments on a late draft were provided by Ubaldo Di Benedetto, Akihiro Kanamori, Roman Kossak, Andrea MacGown, and an anonymous referee. I am grateful to Caroline Jones and Scott Rothkopf for their suggestions about Bochner’s work.

References

  1. 1.
    Anscombe, G. E. M. “The Intentionality of Sensation: A Grammatical Feature.” In Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind: Collected Philosophical Papers Volume II. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1981. Originally published in Butler, R.J. ed., Analytical Philosophy, second series (Oxford: Oxford 1965.)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bochner, Mel. Solar System and Rest Rooms: Writings and Interviews 1965–2007. Writing Art Series. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anscombe, G. E. M.. “Media Study.” Artforum International 51 no. 1 (2012): 463.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buchloh, Benjamin. “Conceptual Art 1962–1969: From the Aesthetic of Administration to the Critique of Institutions.” October 55 (1990): 105–143.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper, S. Barry and Jan van Leeuwen, editors. The Selected Works of A.M. Turing: His Work and Impact. Amsterdam: North-Holland / Elsevier Science, 2013.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Danto, Arthur. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, Martin. “Universality is Ubiquitous.” In [17].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engelmann, Mauro Luiz. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Development: Phenomenology, Grammar, Method, and the Anthropological View. Palgrave History of Analytic Philosophy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Field, Richard S. Mel Bochner: Thought Made Visible 1966–1973. New Haven, CT: Yale University Art Gallery, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Floyd, Juliet. “Wittgenstein on 2,2,2… : On the Opening of Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.” Synthese 87, no. 1 (1991): 143–180.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper, S.. “Heautonomy and the Critique of Sound Judgment: Kant on Reflective Judgment and Systematicity.” In Kant’s Aesthetics, edited by Herman Parrett. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cooper, S.. “Wittgenstein’s Diagonal Argument: A Variation on Cantor and Turing.” In Epistemology versus Ontology, Logic, Epistemology, edited by P. Dybjer et al. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 2012.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cooper, S.. “Das Überraschende: Wittgenstein on the Surprising in Mathematics.” In Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Mind, edited by Jonathan Ellis and Daniel Guevara. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cooper, S.. “Turing, Wittgenstein and Types: Philosophical Aspects of Turing’s “The Reform of Mathematical Notation” [1944–5].” In Alan Turing: His Work and Impact, edited by S. Barry Cooper and Jan van Leeuwen. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cooper, S.. “Aspects of Aspects.” In The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by Hans Sluga and David Stern, 2nd revised ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cooper, S.. “Turing on “Common Sense”: Cambridge Resonances.” In [17].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Floyd, Juliet and Alisa Bokulich, editors. Philosophical Explorations of the Legacy of Alan Turing: Turing 100. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 2017.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hardy, G. H. “Mathematical Proof.” Mind 38, no. 149 (1929): 1–25.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hardy, G. H.. A Mathematician’s Apology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1940.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hilbert, David. “Logic and the Knowledge of Nature.” In From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics, edited by William Ewald. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kanamori, Akihiro. “Mathematical Knowledge: Motley and Complexity of Proof.” Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 21 (2012): 21–35.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment [1790]. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hardy, G. H.. “Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science [1786].” In Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kosuth, Joseph. “Art After Philosophy.” Studio International 178 nos. 915–917 (1969): 134–137, 160–161, 212–213.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meyer, James and Mel Bochner. “Mel Bochner in Conversation with James Meyer.” In [9].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Putnam, Hilary. “Rethinking Mathematical Necessity.” In Words and Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hardy, G. H.. The Collapse of the Fact / Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hardy, G. H.. Philosophy of Logic. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2010.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Quine, W. V. Ontological Relativity, and Other Essays. The John Dewey essays in philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Quine, W. V.. “The Scope and Language of Science [1954].” In The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Belknap / Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Quine, W. V.. Quiddities: An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary. Cambridge, MA: Belknap / Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Quine, W. V.. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rota, Gian-Carlo. “The Phenomenology of Mathematical Beauty.” In Indiscrete Thoughts. Boston: Birkhaüser, 1997.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sandback, Fred. “1975 Notes.” Accessed July 15, 2016. http://fredsandbackarchive.org/texts.html.
  35. 35.
    Sterrett, Susan G. “Turing and the Integration of Human and Machine Intelligence.” In [17].Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thiele, Rüdiger. “Hilbert’s Twenty-Fourth Problem.” American Mathematical Monthly 110 (2003): 1–24.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Turing, Alan M. “On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem.” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 2, no. 42 (1936): 230–265. Reprinted with commentary in [5].Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Quine, W. V.. “Solvable and Unsolvable Problems.” In Science News, edited by A. W. Haslett. London: Penguin Books, 1954. Reprinted with commentary in [5].Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Quine, W. V.. “The Reform of Mathematical Notation and Phraseology [1944–45].” In Collected Works of A.M. Turing: Mathematical Logic, edited by R. O. Gandy and C. E. M. Yates. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000. Reprinted with commentary in [5].Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. International Library of Psychology, Philosophy, and Scientific Method. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Quine, W. V.. Preliminary Studies for the “Philosophical Investigations”: Generally Known as The Blue and Brown Books. New York: Harper and Row, 1965.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Quine, W. V.. “Eine Philosophische Betrachtung.” In Das Blaue Buch, Eine Philosophische Betrachtung (Das Braune Buch). Wittgenstein Werkausgabe, vol. 5. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp / Basil Blackwell, 1969.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Quine, W. V.. Wittgenstein’s Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics: Cambridge, 1939, from the Notes of R.G. Bosanquet, Norman Malcolm, Rush Rhees and Yorick Smythies. Edited by Cora Diamond. Hassocks, Sussex: The Harvester Press, Ltd., 1976.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Quine, W. V.. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Revised, from 1956 edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Quine, W. V.. Philosophical Remarks. Translated by Rhees Rush. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Quine, W. V.. Philosophische Untersuchungen Kritisch-genetische Edition. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2001.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Quine, W. V.. Philosophische Untersuchungen = Philosophical Investigations, revised 4th edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wittgenstein, Ludwig and Mel Bochner. On Certainty = Über Gewissheit. Arion Press Collector’s Edition. San Francisco: Arion Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations