Skip to main content

Inner Simplicity vs. Outer Simplicity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Simplicity: Ideals of Practice in Mathematics and the Arts

Part of the book series: Mathematics, Culture, and the Arts ((MACUAR))

  • 1285 Accesses

Abstract

For me, mathematics is just about understanding. And understanding is a personal and private feeling. However, to appreciate and express this feeling, you need to communicate with others—you need to use language. So there are necessarily two aspects in mathematics: one is very personal, emotional, and internal, and the other is more public and external. Today I want to express this very naïve idea for mathematicians that we should distinguish between two kinds of simplicities. Something could be very simple for me, in my mind, and in my way of knowing mathematics, and yet be very difficult to articulate or write down in a mathematical paper. And conversely, something can be very easy to write down or say in just one sentence of English or French or whatever and nevertheless be all but completely inaccessible to my mind. This basic distinction is something that I believe to be classical, but, nevertheless, we mathematicians conflate the two. We keep forgetting that writing mathematics is not the same as understanding mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Broder, Andrei, Ravi Kumar, Farzin Maghoul, Prabhakar Raghavan, Sridhar Rajagopalan, Raymie Stata, Andrew Tomkins, and Janet Wiener. “Graph Structure in the Web.” Computer Networks 33, no. 1 (2000): 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghys, Étienne. “Construction de champs de vecteurs sans orbite périodique.” Séminaire Bourbaki 36 (1995): 283–307.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hilbert, David. “Mathematical Problems.” Translated by M. W. Newson. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 8, no. 10 (1902): 437–80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Levy, Silvio, Delle Maxwell, and Tamara Munzner. Outside in. Geometry Center, University of Minnesota, 1994. Videorecording.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Online Etymology Dictionary. Accessed July 20, 2016. http://www.etymonline.com/.

  6. Poincaré, Henri. “Intuition and Logic in Mathematics,” in The Value of Science: Essential Writings of Henri Poincaré. New York: Modern Library, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Serre, Jean-Pierre. Cours D’arithmétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1970.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. ———. Complex Semisimple Lie Algebras. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Szemerédi, Endre. “Regular partitions of graphs.” Problèmes combinatoires et théorie des graphes (Colloq. Internat. CNRS, Univ. Orsay, Orsay, 1976), Colloq. Internat. CNRS 260, 399–401. Paris: CNRS, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Étienne Ghys .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ghys, É. (2017). Inner Simplicity vs. Outer Simplicity. In: Kossak, R., Ording, P. (eds) Simplicity: Ideals of Practice in Mathematics and the Arts. Mathematics, Culture, and the Arts. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53385-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics