Advertisement

Gypsum Karst in the Southwest Outskirts of the Eastern European Platform (Western Ukraine): A Type Region of Artesian Transverse Speleogenesis

  • Alexander KlimchoukEmail author
  • Viacheslav Andreychouk
Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads
Part of the Cave and Karst Systems of the World book series (CAKASYWO)

Abstract

The gypsum karst in the Western Ukraine occurs in the southwestern outskirt of the Eastern European Craton and is a model example of evolution of intrastratal karst and of artesian transverse speleogenesis in this lithology. Speleogenesis commenced in the regionally extensive confined Miocene aquifer system, in which the Middle Miocene (Badenian) gypsum bed is sandwiched between two “normal” aquifers with diffused permeability. Speleogenesis developed due to ascending leakage across the gypsum induced by valleys incising into the upper confining sequence. Large gypsum caves in the region (including the five longest gypsum caves in the world) are generally stratiform multi-story mazes of passages developed along vertical and steeply inclined fissures. Cave patterns in plan and the cross section are variable depending on fracture stratigraphy, patterns and connectivity, areal distribution of recharge (at the lower contact) and discharge (at the upper contact) points, and local hydrodynamic conditions and history. Patterns and meso-morphology of the caves clearly demonstrate functional organization that evolved in response to ascending hydraulic communication between the aquifers in the Miocene aquifer system, reflecting the complex pattern of transverse flow across the gypsum. This study demonstrates that artesian transverse speleogenesis is of fundamental importance to groundwater circulation in the region-wide Miocene aquifer system. It has important implications for regional and site-specific hydrogeology, the origin of large bioepigenetic sulfur deposits, and assessment of collapse/subsidence hazard. The style and principal characteristics of the large maze caves in the gypsum karst in the Western Ukraine are not specific to dissolution of sulfate rocks but exemplify general regularities of artesian transverse speleogenesis that are applicable to other lithologies including carbonates.

Keywords

Hypogene speleogenesis Artesian speleogenesis Maze caves Gypsum karst Western Ukraine 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to cavers from many speleological clubs of Ukraine for their support of our field studies through many years. We thank speleological clubs “Kristal” (Chortkiv), “Podillia” (Ternopil) and “Troglodit” (Chernivtsy), and particularly B. Maksimov, S. Kriven, and P. Kuprich for cave maps they provided. E. Naumenko, Yu. Zarembovsky, and V. Apostolyuk are thanked for providing some photographs.

References

  1. Aleksenko II (1967) Sulphur of the pre-Carpathian. Nedra, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. Andreychouk VN (1988) The tectonic factor and peculiarities of the sulfate karst of Bukovina: geology, geomorphology and hydrogeology of karst. Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Sverdlovsk (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. Andreychouk VN (1999) Collapses above gypsum labyrinthic caves and stability assessment of karstified terraines. Prut, Chernivtsy (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. Andreychouk VN (2007) Zoloushka Cave. Silesian University and Ukrainian Institute of Speleology and Karstology, Sosnowiec-Simferopol (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. Andreychouk VN, Klimchouk AB (2001) Geomicrobiology and redox geochemistry of the karstified Miocene gypsum aquifer, Western Ukraine: the study from Zoloushka Cave. Geomicrobiol J 18:275–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andreychouk VN, Klimchouk AB, Boston P, Galuskin EI (2009) Unique iron-manganese colonies of microorganisms in Zoloushka Cave (Ukraine-Moldova). In: Speleology and Karstology 3:5–25. Available at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs/vol34/iss1/4 (in Russian)
  7. Babel M, Bogucki A (2007). The Badenian evaporite basin of the northern Carpathian Foredeep as a model of a meromictic selenite basin. In: Schreiber B, Lugli S, Babel M (eds) Evaporites through space and time. Geological Society, Special Publications, London 285, pp 219–246Google Scholar
  8. Bella P, Bosák P (2012) Speleogenesis along deep regional faults by ascending waters: case studies from Slovakia and Czech Republic. Acta carsologica 41(2–3):169–192Google Scholar
  9. Birk S (2002) Characterisation of karst systems by simulating aquifer genesis and spring responses: model development and application to gypsum karst. Tübingen Geowissenschaftliche Arbeiten, ReineGoogle Scholar
  10. Dreybrodt W, Gabrovsek F, Romanov D (2005) Processes of speleogenesis: a modeling approach. Karst Research Institute at ZRC SAZU, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  11. Dublyansky VN (1966) Karst caves of the Middle Dniester region. In: Voprosy izucheniya karsta Russkoy Rabniny. MOIP, Moscow, pp 99–109 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. Dublyansky VN, Lomaev AA (1980) Karst caves of Ukraine. Naukova dumka, Kiev (in Russian)Google Scholar
  13. Dublyansky VN, Smol’nikov BN (1969) Karstological and geophysical investigations of karst cavities of the Pridnestrovskaya Podoliya I Pokutye. Naukova dumka, Kiev (in Russian)Google Scholar
  14. Ford (1971) Geologic structure and a new explanation of limestone cavern genesis. Trans Cave Res Group Great Br 13(2):81–94Google Scholar
  15. Ford D, Ewers R (1978) The development of limestone cave systems in the dimensions of length and depth. Can J Earth Sci 15(11):1783–1798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ford D, Williams PW (1989) Karst geomorphology and hydrology. Unwin Hyman, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jakucs L, Mezosi G (1976) Genetic problems of the huge gypsum caves of the Ukraine. Acta Geographica XXVI:15–38Google Scholar
  18. Jakucs L, Mezosi G (1991) Podoliai gypszbarlangok genetikajarol. Karst es Barlang (I–II):45–52Google Scholar
  19. Kempe S (1996) Gypsum karst of Germany. In: Klimchouk A, Lowe D, Cooper A, Sauro U (eds) Gypsum karst of the world. Int J Speleology 25(3–4):209–224Google Scholar
  20. Klimchouk AB (1984) Detailed study of water-mechanical sediments of a large cave system. In: Peschery (Caves), Permskiy Universitet, Perm, pp 70–88 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  21. Klimchouk AB (1990) The artesian genesis of the large maze caves in the Miocene gypsum of Western Ukraine. Doklady Akademii Nauk Ukrainskoj SSR ser. B (Kiev) 7:28–32 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  22. Klimchouk AB (1992) Large Gypsum Caves in the Western Ukraine and their genesis. Cave Sci 19(1):3–11Google Scholar
  23. Klimchouk AB (1996a) The typology of gypsum karst according to its geological and geomorphological evolution. In: Klimchouk A, Lowe D, Cooper A, Sauro U (eds) Gypsum karst of the world. Int J Speleology 25(3–4):49–60Google Scholar
  24. Klimchouk AB (1996b) Gypsum karst in the western Ukraine. In: Klimchouk A, Lowe D, Cooper A, Sauro U (eds) Gypsum karst of the world. Int J Speleology 25(3–4):263–278Google Scholar
  25. Klimchouk AB (1997a) The role of karst in the genesis of sulphur deposits, Pre-Carpathian region, Ukraine. Environ Geol 31(1/2):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klimchouk AB (1997b) Speleogenetic effects of water density differences. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Speleology, vol 1, La Chaux-de-Fonds, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  27. Klimchouk AB (2000a) Speleogenesis under deep-seated and confined settings. In: Klimchouk AB, Ford DC, Palmer AN, Dreybrodt W (eds) Speleogenesis: evolution of karst aquifers. National Speleological Society, Huntsville, pp 244–260Google Scholar
  28. Klimchouk AB (2000b) Speleogenesis of great gypsum mazes in the Western Ukraine. In: Klimchouk AB, Ford DC, Palmer AN, Dreybrodt W (eds) Speleogenesis: evolution of karst aquifers. National Speleological Society, Huntsville, pp 261–273Google Scholar
  29. Klimchouk AB (2000c) Speleogenesis in gypsum. In: Klimchouk AB, Ford DC, Palmer AN, Dreybrodt W (eds) Speleogenesis: evolution of karst aquifers. National Speleological Society, Huntsville, pp 431–442Google Scholar
  30. Klimchouk AB (2003) Conceptualisation of speleogenesis in multistory artesian systems: a model of transverse speleogenesis. Speleogenesis Evol Karst Aquifers 1(2). http://speleogenesis.info/journal/publication.php?id=4475. Accessed 15 Sept 2016
  31. Klimchouk AB (2004) Gypsum caves and karst in the Western Ukraine: speleogenetic and typological significance. In: Gypsum karst areas in the world: their protection and tourist development. Istituto Italiano di Speleologia, Memoria XVI, s.II, pp 35–50Google Scholar
  32. Klimchouk AB (2007) Hypogene Speleogenesis: hydrogeological and morphogenetic perspective. National Cave and Karst Research Institute, CarlsbadGoogle Scholar
  33. Klimchouk AB (2012a) Gypsum Caves. In: Culver DC, White WB (eds) Encyclopedia of caves, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Academic Press, pp 364–373Google Scholar
  34. Klimchouk AB (2012b) Speleogenesis, hypogenic. In: Culver DC, White WB (eds) Encyclopedia of caves, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Academic Press, Chennai, pp 748–765Google Scholar
  35. Klimchouk AB (2012c) Ukraine Giant Gypsum Caves. In: Culver DC, White WB (eds) Encyclopedia of caves, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Academic Press, Chennai, pp 827–833Google Scholar
  36. Klimchouk AB (2015) The karst paradigm: changes, trends and perspectives. Acta Carsologica 44(3):289–313Google Scholar
  37. Klimchouk AB (2016) Types of hypogene speleogenesis. In: Chavez T, Reehling P (eds) Proceedings of deep karst: origins, resources, and management of hypogene karst, NCKRI Symposium 6, National Cave and Karst Research Institute, Carlsbad, New Mexico, 11–14 April 2016Google Scholar
  38. Klimchouk AB, Aksem SD (2005) Hydrochemistry and solution rates in gypsum karst: case study from the Western Ukraine. Environ Geol 48:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klimchouk AB, Andreychouk VN (1988) Geologic and hydrogeologic conditions of development of large gypsum caves in the Western Ukraine and their genesis. In: Peshchery (Caves). Gypsum and anhydrite caves. Permskiy Universitet, Perm, pp 12–25 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  40. Klimchouk AB, Andreychouk VN (2002) Karst breakdown mechanisms from observations in the gypsum caves of the Western Ukraine: implications for subsidence hazard assessment. Int J Speleology 31(1/4):55–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Klimchouk AB, Ford DC (2000) Types of karst and evolution of hydrogeologic settings. In: Klimchouk AB, Ford DC, Palmer AN, Dreybrodt W (eds) Speleogenesis: evolution of karst aquifers. National Speleological Society, Huntsville, pp 45–53Google Scholar
  42. Klimchouk AB, Rogozhnikov VY (1982) Conjugate analysis of the formation history of a large cave system (on example of Atlantida Cave). Institute of Geological Sciences of NASU, Kiev (in Russian)Google Scholar
  43. Klimchouk AB, Andreychouk VN, Turchinov II (2009) The structural prerequisites of speleogenesis in gypsum in the Western Ukraine. Silesian University and Ukrainian Institute of Speleology and Karstology, Sosnowiec-SimferopolGoogle Scholar
  44. Lein AJ, Ivanov MV, Rivkina EM, Bondar VA (1977) Differences in isotope composition of carbon of pelitomorphic and crystalline limestones of sulphur deposits in the Pre-Carpathians. Geokhimija 4:578–588 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  45. Lukin VS (1966) About focusing of karst. In: Voprosy isucheniya karsta Russkoi ravniny. Moscow University, Moscow, pp 92–94 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  46. Mamchur GP (1972) Peculiarities of carbon isotopes distribution in carbonates of exogenous sulphur deposits and the possibility of their application for practical purposes. In: Geokhimia i mineralogia sery. Nauka, Moscow, pp 240–252 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  47. Oszczypko N, Krzywiec P, Popadyuk I, Peryt T (2006) Carpathian Foredeep Basin (Poland and Ukraine): its sedimentary, structural, and geodynamic evolution. In: Golonka J. Picha FJ (eds) The Carpathians and their foreland: geology and hydrocarbon resources. AAPG, Memoir 84, pp 293–350Google Scholar
  48. Palmer AN (1975) The origin of maze caves. NSS Bull 37:57–76Google Scholar
  49. Palmer AN (1991) Origin and morphology of limestone caves. Geol Soc Am Bull 103(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peryt TM (2001) Gypsum facies transitions in basin–marginal evaporites: middle Miocene (Badenian) of west Ukraine. Sedimentology 48:1103–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pokalyuk VV, Prokhorenko VP, Grachev AP et al (2010) Integrated morphostructural leveling of horizontal multilevel cave in gypsums (Dnister Podillia region). In: Speleologiya I spelestologia: razvitie i vzaimodeystviye nauk. Naberezhnyye Chelny (Russia), pp 89–93 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  52. Polkunov VF (1990) Mineral concentrations of native sulphur. In: Geotektonika Volyno-Podolii. Naukova dumka, Kiev, pp 229–232 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  53. Rehrl C, Birk S, Klimchouk AB (2008) Conduit evolution in deep-seated settings: conceptual and numerical models based on field observations. Water Resour Res 44:W11425. doi: 10.1029/2008WR006905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shestopalov VM (1981) Natural resources of underground water of platform artesian basins of the Ukraine. Naukova Dumka, Kiev (in Russian)Google Scholar
  55. Svynko IM (1979) Geomorphology and neotectonics. In: Gerenchuk K,I (ed) Nature of the Ternopil’sky region. Vyshcha Shkola, Lviv, pp 48–54 (in Ukrainian)Google Scholar
  56. Tsjurupa PV (1960) Hydrogeological conditions of the Pre-Carpathian sulphur-bearing basin and of its major deposits. Trudy GIGHS 6:112–133 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  57. Zimels YL (2008) Kristal’naya Cave. Ternopil’sky Speleo-Club “Podillia”, Ternopil (in Ukrainian)Google Scholar
  58. Zimels YL (2009) Ozernaya Cave. Aston, Ternopil (in Russian)Google Scholar
  59. Zimels YL, Snigur VA (2012) Mlynki Cave, Ugryn Cave. Ternopil’sky Speleo-Club “Podillia”, Ternopil (in Ukrainian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geological SciencesNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKievUkraine
  2. 2.Pope John Paul II State School of Higher EducationBiala PodlaskaPoland

Personalised recommendations