Skip to main content

Inclusive Leadership

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter begins with a description of inclusive leadership and the anticipated outcomes of more inclusive leadership practices. At the individual level, a starting point is greater self-awareness of the conscious and unconscious biases that are affecting decisions and judgments made about people in the workplace. This chapter also highlights inclusive team leadership, and more broadly the elements that will assist police leaders through the process of embracing a shift in leadership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Banaji MR, Greenwald AG (2013) Blindspot: hidden biases of good people. Delacorte Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bilimoria D (2012) Inclusive leadership. Leadersh Excellence 29(3):13

    Google Scholar 

  3. British Army (2015) British Army launches new leadership code. Retrieved from http://army.mod.uk/news/27973.aspx

  4. Brooke JK, Tyler TR (2011) Diversity and corporate performance: a review of the psychological literature. N C Law Rev 3:715

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown S, Eisenhardt K (1998) Competing on the edge: strategy as structured chaos. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burke WW, Coruzzi CA, Church AH (1996) The organizational survey as an intervention for change. In: Kraut AI (ed) Organizational surveys: tools for assessment and change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 41–66

    Google Scholar 

  7. Byrne D (1971) The attraction paradigm. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carmeli A, Reiter-Palmon R, Ziv E (2010) Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: the mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Res J 22(3):250–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Catalyst (2014) What is unconscious bias? New York: catalyst. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/what-unconscious-bias

  10. Chatman J (1991) Matching people and organizations: selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Adm Sci Q 36:459–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cross R, Brodt S (2001) How assumptions of consensus undermine. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 42(2):86–94

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deloitte (2012) Inclusive leadership: will a hug do? Human Capital, Deloitte Australia point of view. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/au/Documents/human-capital/deloitte-au-hc-diversity-inclusive-leadership-hug-0312.pdf

  13. Drodge E, Murphy S (2002) Interrogating emotions in police leadership. Hum Resour Dev Rev 1(4):420–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q 44(2):350–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edmondson AC (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J Manage Stud 40(6):1419–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Edmondson AC (2004) Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. In: Kramer RM, Cook KS (eds) Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches. Russell Sage, New York, pp 239–272

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edmondson AC, Roloff K (2009) Leveraging diversity through psychological safety, Rotman Magazine, Fall, pp 47–51

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ely R, Meyerson D (2010) An organizational approach to undoing gender: the unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Res Organ Behav 30(C):3–34

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Adm Sci Q 46(2):229–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fazio RH, Eiser JR, Shook NJ (2004) Attitude formation through exploration: valence asymmetries. J Pers Soc Psychol 87(3):293–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Flynn F, Wiltermuth S (2010) Who’s with me? False consensus, brokerage, and ethical decision making in organizations. Acad Manag J 53(5):1074–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Garcia V, Cao L (2005) Race and satisfaction with the police in a small city. J Crim Justice 33(2):191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Greene JR (2000) Community policing in America: changing the nature, structure, and function of the police. In: Horney J (ed) Criminal Justice, vol 3., Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system, NCJ, 182410 office of justice programsUS Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pp 299–370

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jehn K, Northcraft G, Neale M (1999) Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in groups. Adm Sci Q 44(4):741–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Katz J, Miller F (2014) Leaders getting different. OD Practitioner 46(3):40–45

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klayman J (1995) Varieties of confirmation bias. In: Busemeyer J, Hastie R, DLMedin (eds) Decision making from a cognitive perspective. Academic Press (psychology of learning and motivation, vol 32), NewYork, pp. 365–418)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kreuger J, Zeiger J (1993) Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. J Pers Soc Psychol 65(4):670–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Long M, Silverman E (2005) The Anglo-American measurement of police performance: COMPSTAT and best value. Br J Commun Justice 3(3):45–59

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mannix E, Neale M (2005) What differences make a difference? Psychol Sci Publ Interest 6(2):31–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mayer DM, Nishii LH, Schneider B, Goldstein H (2007) The precursors and products of fair climates: group leader antecedents and employee attitudinal consequence. Pers Psychol 60(4):929–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Metropolitan Police (2016) The met is changing. Retrieved from http://content.met.police.uk/Site/changingmet

  32. Miller F, Katz J (2002) The inclusion breakthrough: unleashing the real power of diversity. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nembhard I, Edmondson A (2006) Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav 27(7):941–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nemeth C, Mosler K, Chiles C (1992) When convergent thought improves performance: majority versus minority influence. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 18(2):139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nickerson R (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2(2):175–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nishi L, Mayer D (2009) Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader-member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. J Appl Psychol 94(6):1412–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Opportunity Now (2014) Inclusive leadership: culture change for business success. Retrieved from http://gender.bitc.org.uk/system/files/research/inclusive_leadership_culture_change_for_business_success.pdf

  38. Riordan CM, Shore LM (1997) Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: an empirical examination of relational demography within work units. J Appl Psychol 82(3):342–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosenbaum M (1986) Comment on a proposed two-stage theory of relationship formation: first, repulsion; then, attraction. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1171–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schein E, Bennis W (1965) Personal and organizational change via group methods. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schneider B (1987) The people make the place. Pers Psychol 40:437–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shapiro Consulting and Opportunity Now (2011) Inclusive leadership: from Pioneer to mainstream

    Google Scholar 

  43. Solan L, Rosenblatt T, Osherson D (2008) False consensus bias in contract interpretation. Columbia Law Rev 108(5):1268–1300

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stainback K, Ratliff T, Roscigno V (2011) The context of workplace sex discrimination: sex, composition, workplace culture and relative power. Soc Forces 89(4):435–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tyler T, Lind E (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:115–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Webber SS, Donahue LM (2001) Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. J Manag 27(2):131–162

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yukl G (2002) Leadership in organizations, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela L. Workman-Stark .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Workman-Stark, A.L. (2017). Inclusive Leadership. In: Inclusive Policing from the Inside Out. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53309-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53309-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53308-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53309-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics