Skip to main content

Global Trade Impacts from Low Level Presence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 51))

Abstract

Asynchronous regulatory approval and commercialization of new GM traits in a range of extensively traded food crops can cause significant trade disruptions. The adventitious presence of a number of unapproved or incompletely approved traits in canola, corn, rice and flax has been associated with economic harm. Market losses from diversion to second-best markets, increasing marketing costs for securing quality assured supplies, added regulatory compliance time and costs as well as costly and often destructive litigation have been linked to such events. Fears of similar events in wheat, soybeans and other staple crops have generated significant concern. This chapter examines the root of the regulatory challenge, evaluates the immediate impacts on the market, assesses the long-term implications on research and investment in advanced crop varieties and considers the global impacts on consumers and food security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alston, J., M. Mara, P. Pardey, and T. Wyatt. 1998. Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D. Environment and Production Technology Division Discussion Paper No. 38. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, J., G. Norton, and P. Pardey. 1995. Science under scarcity: principles and practice of agricultural research evaluation and priority setting. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. 2010. Economic impacts of policies affecting crop biotechnology and trade. New Biotechnology 27 (5): 558–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, J.C., G.W. Norton, and J. Falck-Zepeda. 2010. Cost of compliance with biotechnology regulation in the Philippines: Implications for developing countries. AgBioForum 13 (1): 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, G., and P. Barfoot. 2010. GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996–2008. Dorchester, UK: PG Economics Ltd. http://www.pgeconomics.co.uk/pdf/2010-global-gm-crop-impact-study-final-April-2010.pdf.

  • Doern, B., and T. Reed. 2000. Risky Business. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleim, S., S.J. Smyth and P.W.B. Phillips. 2016. Regulatory system impacts on global GM crop adoption patterns. Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 17(20): 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggui, F. 2004. EU opposition to GM wheat in terms of global food security. PhD Thesis, University of Saskatchewan. http://library2.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-09212004-133502/unrestricted/thesis.pdf.

  • Hobbs, J.E., W.A. Kerr, and S.J. Smyth. 2014. How low can you go? The consequences of zero tolerance. AgBioForum 16 (3): 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISAAA. 2011. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops. ISAAA Brief 42-2010. www.isaaa.org.

  • Isaac, G. 2002. Agricultural Biotechnology and Transatlantic Trade: Regulatory Barriers to GM Crops. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, C. 2003. Preview: Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2003. ISAAA Briefs No. 30. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. 2015. isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/51/default.asp 20th Anniversary (1996 to 2015) of the Global Commercialization of Biotech Crops and Biotech Crop Highlights in 2015. ISAAA Brief 51. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.

  • Kalaitzandonakes, N., J.M. Alston, and K.J. Bradford. 2007. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops. Nature Biotechnology 25: 509–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W.A. 2014. The Trade System and Biotechnology. In Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development, ed. S.J. Smyth, P.W.B. Phillips, and D. Castle, 217–229. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W.A., and N. Perdikis. 2014. A Guide to the Global Business Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusk, J., M. Jamal, L. Kurlander, M. Roucan, and L. Taulman. 2005. A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30 (1): 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschini, G., H. Lapan, and A. Sobolevsky. 1999. Roundup ready soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex. Agribusiness 16: 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oehmke, J., M. Maredia, and D. Weatherspoon. 2001. The effects of biotechnology policy on trade and growth. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 2(2):283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdikis, N. 2000. A conflict of legitimate concerns or pandering to vested interests? Conflicting attitudes towards the regulation of trade in genetically modified goods - The EU and the US. Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 1 (1): 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P.W.B., and H. McNeill. 2000. Labeling for GM foods: Theory and practice. AgBioForum 3 (4): 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P.W.B. 2003. The economic impact of herbicide tolerant canola in Canada. In The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective, ed. N. Kalaitzanondakes, 119–140. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P.W.B. 2009. Coexistence as a Problem of Market-making. 4th International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified and non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains. Melbourne, Australia, November 10–12. http://www.gmcc-09.com/wp-content/uploads/phillips.pdf.

  • Pray, C.E., P. Bengali, and B. Ramaswami. 2005. The cost of regulation: The India experience. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 44 (3): 267–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pray, C.E., B. Ramaswami, J. Huang, R. Hu, P. Bengali, and H. Zhang. 2006. Costs and enforcement of biosafety regulations in India and China. International Journal of Technology and Globalization 2 (1&2): 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogstad, G. 2008. Supranational Regulation and Contested Accountability: The Case of GMO Risk Regulation in the European Union. Florence: EUI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, S.J., W.A. Kerr, and P.W.B. Phillips. 2011. Recent trends in the scientific basis of sanitary and phytosanitary trade rules and their potential impact on investment. The Journal of World Investment and Trade 12 (1): 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viju, C., M.T. Yeung, and W.A. Kerr. 2012. The trade implications of the post-moratorium European Union approval system for genetically modified organisms. Journal of World Trade 46 (5): 1207–1238.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart J. Smyth .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smyth, S.J., Kerr, W.A., Phillips, P.W.B. (2017). Global Trade Impacts from Low Level Presence. In: Biotechnology Regulation and Trade. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53295-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics