Skip to main content

Domestic Regulatory Approval Costs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biotechnology Regulation and Trade

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 51))

Abstract

Concerns over the effects on human and animal health from consumption of genetically modified food crops, as well as about any potential impacts on the wider environment, have divided public opinion over the merits of using the technology. One consequence is that governments have, for the most part, been very cautious about approving GM crops for cultivation and consumption. A concomitant effect is that the costs involved (and time spent) in achieving regulatory approval for the introduction of a GM crop have risen. This chapter examines the evidence on the absolute and relative costs of gaining regulatory compliance within countries. A range of studies show that there are significant costs of gaining regulatory compliance—product attributes, market context and technical aspects of measurement all have significant effects on the estimated costs of regulatory approval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alston, J.M., M. Marra, P. Pardey, and T. Wyatt. 2000. Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 44 (2): 185–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, J., G. Norton, and J. Falck-Zepeda. 2010. Cost of compliance with biotechnology regulation in the Philippines: Implications for developing countries. AgBioForum 13 (1): 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, G. 2014. Global adoption of GM Crops, 1995–2012. In Handbook on agriculture, biotechnology and development, ed. S.J. Smyth, P.W.B. Phillips, and D. Castle, 25–35. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, R., I. Langford, I. Bateman, and R. Turner. 1999. A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. Regional Environmental Change 1 (1): 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CamisĂłn-Zornoza, C., R. Lapiedra-AlcamĂ­, M. Segarra-CiprĂ©s, and M. Boronat-Navarro. 2004. A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies 25 (3): 331–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D.K., G.E. Pinches, and V.K. Narayanan. 1992. Factors influencing wealth creation from mergers and acquisitions: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal 13: 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doern, B., and M. Prince. 2012. Three bio-realms: Biotechnology and the governance of food, health, and life in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck-Zepeda, J., J. Yorobe, A. Manalo, G. Ramon, A. Bahagiawati, E.M. Lokollo, S. Supriyati, and P. Zambrano. 2006. The cost of compliance with biosafety regulations in Indonesia and The Philippines. July–August: Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck-Zepeda, J., and J. Cohen. 2006. Biosafety regulations of genetically modified orphan crops. In Regulating agricultural biotechnology: Economics and policy, ed. R.E. Just, J.M. Alston, and D. Zilberman, 509–533. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, H.W. 2002. Econometric analysis, 5th ed. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggui, F., P.W.B. Phillips, and R. Gray. 2006. Opposition to genetically modified wheat and global food security. In International trade and policies for GM products, ed. R. Evenson, and V. Santaniello, 175–190. Wallingoford, UK: CABI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L.V., and I. Olkin. 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, G. 2002. Agricultural biotechnology and trans-atlantic trade. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. 2015. 20th Anniversary (1996 to 2015) of the Global Commercialization of Biotech Crops and Biotech Crop Highlights in 2015. ISAAA Brief No. 51. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzandonakes, N., J.M. Alston, and K.J. Bradford. 2007. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of newbiotech crops. Nature Biotechnology 25: 509–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusk, J.L., M. Jamal, L. Kurlander, M. Roucan, and L. Taulman. 2005. A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30(1): 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marra, M., and B. Schurle. 1994. Wheat yield risk and aggregation: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19 (1): 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulatu, A., R.J.G.M. Florax, and C. Withagen. 2003. Environmental regulation and competitiveness: An exploratory meta-analysis. In Empirical modeling of the economy and the environment, ed. C. Böhringer, and A. Löschel, 23–54. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget. 1996. Economic Analysis of Federal Regulations Under Executive Order 12866, January 11, 1996. Available at: www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg_riaguide.

  • Paarlberg, R. 2008. Starved for science: How biotechnology is being kept out of Africa. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips McDougall. 2011a. The cost and time involved in the discovery, development and authorization of a new plant biotechnology derived trait: A consultancy study for CropLife International. Midlothian, UK: Phillips McDougall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P.W.B. 2011b. LLP impacts on global trade, agricultural innovation and commodity prices. Presentation to GM Co-existence Conference, Vancouver, Canada, October 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pray, C.E. 2013. Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pray, C., P. Bengali, and B. Ramaswami. 2005. The cost of regulation: The India experience. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 44 (3): 267–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pray, C.E., B. Ramaswami, J. Huang, R. Hu, P. Bengali, and H. Zhang. 2006. Benefits and costs of biosafety regulations in India and China. In Regulating agricultural biotechnology: Economics and policy, ed. R.E. Just, D. Zilberman, and J.M. Alston, 481–508. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skogstad, G. 2008. Internationalization and Canadian agriculture: Policy and governing paradigms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, S.J., and P.W.B. Phillips. 2002. Competitors co-operating: Establishing a supply chain to manage genetically modified canola. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 4 (1): 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W.K., and J.E. Aldy. 2002. The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Discussion Paper Series. Paper 392. Available at: http://lsr.nellco.org/harvard_olin/392.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart J. Smyth .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smyth, S.J., Kerr, W.A., Phillips, P.W.B. (2017). Domestic Regulatory Approval Costs. In: Biotechnology Regulation and Trade. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53295-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics