Advertisement

Understanding Financial Crises: The Contribution of the Philosophy of Money

  • Antoon VandeveldeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Virtues and Economics book series (VIEC, volume 1)

Abstract

The paper underlines that the origin of money lies more in the religious and legal sphere than in the economic realm. Money was used in the exchange between men and goods and in order to compensate for manslaughter, rather than for facilitating the satisfaction of material needs. ‘Vergelding’, the conversion of guilt into debt was a means to prevent revenge and violence. But soon unease cropped up: the possibility to express everything that is valuable in monetary terms was felt as a form of violence against the soul of men and things.

Aristotle has tried to fit money in a teleolog ical view of the world, but he was faced with the ambivalence of money. Money was deemed to be good as a unit for calculation and as a means of exchange, but it was distrusted as a value reserve. However, it is impossible to separate the three functions of money, as many utopian reformers of the monetary order have tried. The paper emphasizes that nowadays we experience the violent potential of money in the coercion to pay back our debts. Debts have to be repaid, otherwise the debtor will be destroyed as an autonomous subject. The conflict between various categories of debtors and creditors is the most prominent form of “class struggle” we face in our society. It is also a clash between various conceptions of distributive justice.

Keywords

Economic Agent Public Debt Real Wealth Global Financial Market Foreign Creditor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aglietta, M., and A. Orléans. 1982. La violence de la monnaie. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2002. La monnaie entre confiance et violence. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  3. Laum, B. 1924. Heiliges Geld – Eine historische Untersuchung über den sakralen Ursprung des Geldes. J.C.B. Mohr Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Orléans, A. 1987. Anticipations et conventions en situation d’incertitude. Revue d’Economie Politique 13 (1): 153–172.Google Scholar
  5. Sandel, M. 2002. What Money Cannot Buy – The Moral Limits of the Market, vol. 2012. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  6. Servet, J-M.. 1984. Nomismata – Etats and origines de la monnaie. Presses universtaire de Lyon.Google Scholar
  7. Simmel, G. 1900. Philosophie des Geldes. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice – A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Catholic University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations