Advertisement

Teleological Reasoning in Economics

  • Luk BouckaertEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Virtues and Economics book series (VIEC, volume 1)

Abstract

The prime example of a teleological approach to economics can be found in the first part of Aristotle’s Politics. He defines economics as the art of creating the material and social conditions for the survival of the oikos or household. Simultaneously, he integrates economics in a social matrix that subordinates economics to politics and ethics. Modern philosophy and economics is anti-Aristotelian and anti-teleological. Modern economic actors are supposed to be driven by autonomous preferences and free choices. The market functions as a causal equilibrium mechanism that promote welfare for everyone as an unintended byproduct. Although Adam Smith interpreted this unintended teleological effect as an ‘invisible hand’, he was one of the first moral philosophers to underpin this order with a non-teleological substratum. After him, the deconstruction of teleology pursued its logic giving way to the idea of economics as a process of ‘creative destruction’ (Schumpeter). The paper explores how thinking economics as a relational dynamic opens a space for human creativity without losing the embeddedness in an ecological system of meaning and purpose.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Servant Leadership Manager Manager Free Market Economy Impartial Spectator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aristotle. The Politics (written 335–323 BC), published in Penguin Classics, 1962, 1981, London.Google Scholar
  2. Benedict, X.V.I. 2009. Caritas in Veritate. Vaticana: Liberia Editrice.Google Scholar
  3. Bouckaert, L. 1998. The Ethics of Interest. A Cultural-Historical Perspective. In Working Across Cultures. Ethical Perspectives for Intercultural Management, eds. H. Lange, A. Löhr, and H.D. Steinmann, 305–321. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2008. Rational Versus Spiritual Concepts of Frugality. In Frugality. Rebalancing Material and Spiritual Values in Economic Life, eds. L. Bouckaert, H. Opdebeeck, and L. Zsolnai, 27–45. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2011a. Spirituality and Rationality. In The Palgrave Handbook of Spirituality and Business, eds. L. Bouckaert and L. Zsolnai, 18–26. Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2011b. Personalism. In The Palgrave Handbook of Spirituality and Business, eds. L. Bouckaert and L. Zsolnai, 155–163. Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2011c. Spiritual-Based Leadership. In Responsibility, Deep Ecology & The Self, eds. O. Jacobson and L. Pederson, 235–249. Oslo: Forlag 1.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2012. Leadership Ethics and Caritas in Veritate. In The Moral Dynamics of Economic Life. An Extension and Critique of Caritas in Veritate, ed. D.K. Finn, 83–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2013. Schumacher and the Principle of Responsibility in Economics. In Responsible Economics. E.F. Schumacher and his Legacy for the 21st Century, ed. H. Opdebeeck, 209–225. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  10. Bouckaert, L., and L. Zsolnai, eds. 2007. Spirituality as a Public Good. Garant: Antwerp.Google Scholar
  11. Bruni, L. 2012. The Wound and the Blessing Economics, Relationships and Happiness. New York: New City Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bruni, L., and S. Zamagni. 2007. Civil Economy. Efficiency, Equity, Public Happiness. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  13. Freeman, E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  14. Hoevel, C. 2009. Towards the Paradigm of Gift. Revista Cultura Economica 75/76: 89–97.Google Scholar
  15. Lietaer, B. 2001. The Future of Money. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  16. Lietaer, B., and J. Dunne. 2013. Rethinking Money. How New Currencies Turn Scarcity into Prosperity. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Maritain, J. 1936. Humanisme Intégral. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
  18. Mounier, E. 1936. Manifeste au service du personnalisme. Paris: Montaigne.Google Scholar
  19. Pruzan, P., and K. Pruzan Mikkelsen. 2007. Leading with Wisdom Spiritual-based Leadership in Business. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schumacher, E.F. 2004. A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  22. Scitovsky, T. 1976. The Joyless Economy: An Inquiry into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Allan Lane.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, A. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Reprint in 1976. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1776. The Wealth of Nations. Published in Penguin Books, 1970, London.Google Scholar
  27. Zsolnai, L., and K. Ims. 2005. Business within Limits: Deep Ecology and Buddhist Economics. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Catholic University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.European SPES InstituteLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations