Advertisement

Issues and Themes in Moral Economics

  • Laszlo ZsolnaiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Virtues and Economics book series (VIEC, volume 1)

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the main issues and themes of the book and shows its contributions to the development of moral economics.

Zamagni suggests that we can harness market interactions by re-defining the market in a non-individualistic way, as a network of mutually beneficial relations, along the lines suggested by the civil economy paradigm. Bouckaert underlines that thinking of economics as a relational dynamic opens a space for human creativity without losing the embeddedness in a system of meaning and purpose.

Following Amartya Sen economic reason can be understood as reasonableness of preferences, choices and actions. Zsolnai argues that reason requires that economic activities are achieved in ecological, future-respecting and pro-social ways. But Peter Rona warns that the corporation was born as the device for severing the unity between the act and responsibility. He concludes that positivist economic theory, when combined with the function performed by the corporate veil destroys the unity between the action, the actor and the moral responsibility for the action with the result that the corporation must do without the basis for a morally authentic life. Helen Alford suggests that economics needs to be more reflective about its underlying ideas. Whereas the tradition of jurisprudence is well established in the legal field, economics has no equivalent tradition of self reflection.

Keywords

Mainstream Economic Moral Economic Market Interaction Ethical Field Corporate Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akerlof, G., and S. Kranton. 2000. Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 65 (3): 715–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, A.B. 2009. Economics as a Moral Science. Economica 76 (Suppl 1): 791–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benedict XVI, 2009. Caritas in veritate. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
  4. Boulding, K. 1969. Economics as a Moral Science. American Economic Review 59 (1969): 1–14.Google Scholar
  5. Buber, M. 2000. I and Thou. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  6. Daly, H., and J. Cobb. 1989. For the Common Good. Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  7. DeMartino, G.E., and D.N. McCloskey, eds. 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Etzioni, A. 1988. The Moral Dimension. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goulet, D. 1995. Development Ethics: A Guide to Theory and Practice. New York: Apex Pr.Google Scholar
  10. Kolm, S. 2000. Introduction to the Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism. In The Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism, eds. L. Gerard Varet, S. Kolm, and J. Mercier Ythier. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  11. Maritain, J. 1936. Humanisme Intégral. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
  12. McKenna, B., D. Rooney, and K. Boal. 2009. Wisdom Principles as a Meta-Theoretical Basis for Evaluating Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 20 (2): 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2004. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Corvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary
  2. 2.European SPES InstituteLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations