Advertisement

Economic Wisdom for Managerial Decision-Making

  • Mike ThompsonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Virtues and Economics book series (VIEC, volume 1)

Abstract

The paper argues that Aristotle’s “phronesis” can be explained as social practice wisdom, a discursive system linking mind and social practice to produce wellbeing and human flourishing. It uses the contemporary conceptualization of phronesis and its related metatheoretical construct of wisdom principles to bring a practical dimension to wise decision-making. The paper first reviews progress in the understanding of wise leadership within leadership studies and the principles of wisdom proposed by McKenna. Against this taxonomy it then recontextualizes the numerous calls in leadership literature for qualitative, research. It presents samples and interprets the resulting theory based in original material from interviews with 184 managers generated by the Wisdom Project.

The paper concludes that an economic wisdom is present in the minds of managers. Economic wisdom could offer resources for management education and development across all business domains to address the challenges of the VUCA world with a more realistic, holistic and planet-friendly approach.

Keywords

Emotional Regulation United Nations Institutional Investor Practical Wisdom Global Compact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Accenture. 2016. The UN Global Compact: Accenture Strategy CEO Study. Source: https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insight-UN-global-compact-CEO-study?c=strat_stratsmctwt_10000160&n=smc_0316.
  2. Alford, H.J., and M.J. Naughton. 2001. Managing as if Faith Mattered: Christian Social Principles in the Modern Organization. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barton, D. 2011. CEOs Can Attract Long-Term Investors. HBR Blog Network. Source: https://hbr.org/2011/09/how-ceos-can-attract-investors
  4. Becker, G.S. 1993. Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior. Journal of Political Economy 101(3): 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bevan, D., and P. Werhane. 2015. The Inexorable Sociality of Commerce: The Individual and Others in Adam Smith. Journal of Business Ethics 127(2): 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouckaert, L., and L. Zsolnai, ed. 2011. The Palgrave Handbook of Spirituality and Business. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, V. 1994. Adam Smith’s Discourse: Canonicity, Commerce, and Conscience. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, A. 1968. Is Business Bluffing Ethical? Harvard Business Review 143: 155.Google Scholar
  9. Columbo, R.J. 2009. Exposing the Myth of Homo Economicus. Journal of Law & Public Policy 32(2): 737–765.Google Scholar
  10. Drucker, P.F. 1968. The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Dunne, J. 1997. Back to the Rough Ground: Practical Judgement and the Lure of Technique. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  12. George, W. 2013, December. Bill George on Rethinking Capitalism. McKinsey Quarterly.Google Scholar
  13. Gigerenzer, G., and H. Brighton. 2009. Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science 1: 107–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grint, K. 2007. Learning to Lead: Can Aristotle Help Us Find the Road to Wisdom? Leadership 3(2): 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griswold, C.L. 1999. Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Haldane, A. 2012. “The Dog and the Frisbee”, Speech Given at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s 36th Economic Policy Symposium “The Changing Policy Landscape”. Jackson Hole, Wyoming.Google Scholar
  17. Hauerwas, S. 1974. Vision and Virtue. Fides: Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  18. Heinemann, B. 2016, July 26. How the CFO and General Counsel Can Partner More Effectively. The Daily Alert, Harvard Business School. Available at: https://hbr.org/2016/07/how-the-cfo-and-general-counsel-can-partner-more-effectively.
  19. Ip, P.K. 2009. Is Confucianism Good for Business Ethics in China? Journal of Business Ethics 88(3): 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 1979: 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kinsella, E.A. and A. Pitman (Eds.) 2012. Phronesis as Professional Knowledge: Practical Wisdom in the Professions. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Kongsbakk, N. and D. Rooney. 2016. Too Busy to Learn: Wisdom, Mindfulness, and Grounding Learning. In Wisdom Learning: Perspectives on Wising up Management Education, ed. W. Küpers and O. Gunnlaugson. London: Gower.Google Scholar
  23. KPMG. 2014. A New Vision of Value. KPMG International.Google Scholar
  24. MacIntyre, A. 1984. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd ed. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Malinowski, P. 2013. Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Control in Mindfulness Meditation. Frontiers in Neuroscience 7.Google Scholar
  26. McKenna, B. 2013. The Multi-Dimensional Character of Wisdom. In Wise Management in Organisational Complexity, ed. M. Thompson and D. Bevan, 13–33. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  27. McKenna, B., and D. Rooney. 2008. Wise Leadership and the Capacity for Ontological Acuity. Management Communication Quarterly 21: 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKenna, B., D. Rooney, and K. Boal. 2009. Wisdom Principles as a Meta-Theoretical Basis for Evaluating Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 20(2): 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Midgley, M. 2009, April 20. Hobbes’s Leviathan, Part 3: What is Selfishness? The Guardian. Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/apr/20/religion-philosophy-hobbes-dawkins-selfishness.
  30. Polanyi, M. 1962. The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory. Minerva 1(1): 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 1967. The Growth of Science in Society. Minerva 5(4): 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Polman, P. 2011. The Remedies for Capitalism. McKinsey. Source: http://www.mckinsey.com/en/Capitalism/Paul_Polman.aspx.
  33. ———. 2012, June. Captain Planet: An Interview with Unilever CEO Paul Polman. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  34. Rand, A. 2007. Atlas Shrugged. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  35. Raphael, D.D. 2007. The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rifkin, J. 2009. The Empathic Civilisation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Robinson, D.N. 1990. Wisdom Through the Ages. In Wisdom: Its Mature, Origins, and Development, ed. R.J. Sternberg, 13–24. New York: New York, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rooney, D. 2013a. Empirical Wisdom Research. In Wise Management in Organisational Complexity, ed. M. Thompson and D. Bevan, 34–52. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 2013b. Being a Wise Organizational Researcher: Ontology, Epistemology and Axiology. In A Handbook of Practical Wisdom: Leadership, Organization and Integral Business Practice, ed. Wendelin Küpers and David J. Pauleen, 79–98. London: Gower.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2016. The Knowledge Economy, Knowledge Policy, & Wisdom Site. Source: https://sites.google.com/site/davidrooneyknowledge.
  41. Rooney, D., B. McKenna, and P. Liesch. 2010. Wisdom and Management in the Knowledge Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Sen, A. 1977. Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs 6(4): 317–344.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, A. 1790. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. R.P. Hanley (2009). London: Penguin Edition.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth Of Nations, ed. Andrew Skinner (1982). London: Penguin Edition.Google Scholar
  46. Solomon, R. 2006. Free Enterprise, Sympathy and Virtue. Free Enterprise: Values in Action Conference Series, 2005–2006. Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=927482.
  47. Sternberg, R.J. 1998. A Balance Theory of Wisdom. Review of General Psychology 2(4): 247–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson, M.J. 2007. Homo Spiritualis in Business. In Spirituality as a Public Good, ed. L. Bouckaert and L. Zsolnai. Garant: Antwerp.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2011a. A Philosophy and Spirituality of Wisdom-Based Leadership. In Leading with Wisdom, ed. M. Thompson and J. Eynikel. Garant: Antwerp.Google Scholar
  50. ———., ed. 2011b. Business, Spirituality and the Common Good. Russell: Boise.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2012. On Self-interest. In Spiritual Humanism and Economic Wisdom, ed. H. Opdebeeck and L. Zsolnai. Garant: Antwerp.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 2017. How Managers Understand Wisdom in Decision-Making: A Phronetic Research Approach. In Wisdom Learning: Perspectives on Wising up Management Education, ed. W. Küpers and O. Gunnlaugson. London: Gower.Google Scholar
  53. Trowbridge, R.H. 2011. Waiting for Sophia: 30 Years of Conceptualizing Wisdom in Empirical Psychology. Research in Human Development 8(2): 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang, C.L., and X. Lin. 2009. Migration of Chinese Consumption Values: Traditions, Modernization, and Cultural Renaissance. Journal of Business Ethics 88(3): 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Werhane, P. 1989. Adam Smith and His Legacy for Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Whetstone, J.T. 2003. The Language of Managerial Excellence: Virtues as Understood and Applied. Journal of Business Ethics 44(4): 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson, E.O. 1998. Consilience. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  58. Zsolnai, L., ed. 2011. Spirituality and Ethics in Management. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GoodBrandLondonUK
  2. 2.China Europe International Business SchoolShanghaiChina
  3. 3.University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations