Abstract
One question that has long haunted philosophy of science is whether facts and values are so inextricably mixed up in social science that objectivity in any sense robust enough to distinguish its findings from mere opinion becomes unattainable. A not uncommon view nowadays is that such entanglement only shows the untenability of conceptions of objectivity that forbid it and that a new and value-sensitive conception of objectivity needs to be developed. While the discussion in recent years has centred on the issue of how estimations of inductive risk incur judgments of value—and so generalize the issue across all of the sciences—it is worthwhile to remember that in the decades around the previous turn of the century when the social sciences became established as such, it was the more or less direct interference of politics in the process of social scientific fact finding that was the focus of concern and prompted the demand for value-neutrality. This older worry has not, I submit, lost its urgency and it may be salutary to consider whether, especially in sciences issuing in policy advice, value entanglement is inevitable there as well. I will present a case study from what may at first appear most hostile territory, namely one of the most value-laden of all areas in the social sciences, the socialist calculation debate in political economy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
While I am not unsympathetic to the argument that it is not social science but social philosophy, I shall here treat political economy as a representative of normatively exposed social science and the episode in question as offering a particularly sharp challenge to the general demand for value-neutrality in social science.
- 3.
For Schäffle, supply and demand under socialism “would fall into a hopeless quantitative and qualitative discrepancy” (1875/1892, 87). Schäffle also raised the other two standard objections to socialism: how its institution could overcome the presumed problem of resultant motivation deficits on part of the workers, and how the infringement of the sovereignity of choice of labor and consumption was to be handled.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
Mises (1940/1949, 4).
- 14.
- 15.
Ibid.
- 16.
- 17.
Ibid., 22.
- 18.
Ibid., 12–13.
- 19.
Ibid., 13–14.
- 20.
Ibid., 24.
- 21.
Mises (1922, 11–12, trans. TU). The sections §§ 4–5 of the Introduction from which this quotation is taken were dropped from the second German edition and so were never made it into the translation.
- 22.
Ibid., 90–91.
- 23.
See Weber (1921/1978, 24–26).
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
Mises (1920/1935, 104).
- 27.
See Weber (1921/1978, 103)
- 28.
Mises (1920/1935, 103).
- 29.
Ibid., 105.
- 30.
Ibid., 109–110.
- 31.
Mises (1949, 699).
- 32.
Mises (1957, 242, emphasis added).
- 33.
Mises (1962/2002, 113, 116, 119).
- 34.
- 35.
- 36.
- 37.
This is a point shared by contemporary ecological economists: see Martinez-Alier (1995).
- 38.
- 39.
- 40.
Note that even a sympathetic critic like Robert Nozick, who is open to the possibility of synthetic necessary truths, cast doubt on Mises’s conception of the status of his theory of action (1977, 361–369).
- 41.
The seed of Hayek’s information argument can be found at Mises (1920/1935, 102), but
- 42.
See, e.g., Lange (1936).
- 43.
- 44.
- 45.
- 46.
For a recent critical discussion see O’Neill (2012).
- 47.
To be sure, this argument also presupposes the distinction between epistemic and non-epistemic values. Steel (2010) has provided a solid defence against recent challenges to that distinction.
References
Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. 1896. Zum Abschluss des Marxschen Systems. In Staatswissenschaftliche Arbeiten. Festgabe für Karl Knies, ed. O.V. Boenigk, Berlin. Trans. Karl Marx and the Close of his System, Kelley, New York, 1949.
Douglas, Heather. 2000. Inductive Risk and Values in Science. Philosophy of Science 67: 559–579.
———. 2009. Science, Policy and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Grimmer-Solem, Eric. 2003. The Rise of Historical Economics and Social Reform in Germany 1864–1894. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hands, Wade. 2001. Reflection Without Rules. Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hansen, Reginald. 1968. Der Methodenstreit in den Sozialwissenschaften zwischenGustav Schmoller und Karl Menger. In Beitraege zur Entwicklung der Wissenschaftstheorie im 19. Jahrhundert, ed. A. Diemer, 137–173. Meisenheim: Hain.
Hayek, Friedrich von. 1935a. [Socialist Calculation II:] The Present State of the Debate. In Hayek 1935b, 201–243. Reprinted in Hayek 1948, 148–180.
———, ed. 1935b. Collectivist Economic Planning Critical Studies of the Possibility of Socialism. London: Routledge.
———. 1940. [Socialist Calculation III:] The Competitive Solution, Economica 7. Reprinted in Hayek 1948, 181–208.
———. 1945. The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review 35: 519–530. Reprinted in Hayek 1948, 77–91.
———. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Horkheimer, Max. 1937. Der neueste Angriff auf die Metaphysik. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6: 4–51. Trans. “The Latest Attack on Metaphysics” in Horkheimer, Critical Theory. Selected Essays. New York: Continuum, 1972.
Hutchison, Terence. 1953. A Review of Economic Doctrines, 1870–1929. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kautsky, Karl. 1902. Die soziale Revolution. Bd. 2: Am Tage nach der Revolution. Dietz, Stuttgart, Trans. The Social Revolution and On the Morrow of the Revolution, London, 1907.
Lange, Oskar. 1936. “On the Economic Theory of Socialism”, Review of Economic Studies 4, reprinted. with additions and changes in B. E. Lippincott (ed.), On the Economic Theory of Socialism, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1938, reprinted McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964, 55–143.
Martinez-Alier, Juan. 1995. Political Ecology. Distributional Conflicts and Economic Incommensurability. New Left Review 21: 70–88.
Menger, Carl. 1883. Untersuchungen ueber die Methode der Socialwissenschaften und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondere, Vienna. Trans. Problems of Economics and Sociology, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1963. Repr. as In vestigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. New York: New York University Press, 1985.
———. 1884. Die Irrtuemer des Historismus in der deutschen Nationaloekonomie. Vienna. Reprinted in Menger, Gesammelte Werke. Band III (ed. F.A. Hayek), 2nd edition, Mohr, Tuebingen, 1970, 1–98.
Mises, Ludwig von. 1920. Die Wirtschaftsrechnung im sozialistischen Gemeinwesen. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 47: 86–121. Trans. “Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth” in Hayek 1935b, 78–130.
———. 1922. Die Gemeinwirtschaft. Untersuchungen ueber den Sozialismus. Fischer, Jena. 2nd enlarged ed. 1932. Trans. Socialism. An Economic and Sociological Analysis. London: Cape, 1936, 2nd enlarged ed. 1951.
———. 1924. Neue Beiträge zum Problem der sozialistischen Wirtschaftsrechnung. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 51: 488–500.
———. 1928. Neue Schriften zum Problem der sozialistischen Wirtschaftsrechnung. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 60: 187–190.
———. 1929. Soziologie und Geschichte. Epilog zum Methodenstreit in der Nationaloekonomie. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 61: 465–512. Reprinted in Mises 1933b. Trans. “Sociology and History”, in Mises 1960, 68–129.
———. 1933a. Aufgabe und Umfang der allgemeinen Wissenschaft vom menschlichen Handeln. In Mises 1933b. Trans. “The Task and Scope of the Science of Human Action”, in Mises 1960, 1–67.
———. 1933b. Grundprobleme der Nationaloekonomie. Untersuchungen ueber Verfahren, Aufgaben und Inhalt der Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftslehre, Jena.
———. 1940. Nationaloekonomie. Theorie des Handelns und Wirtschaftens. Editions Union, Geneva. Reprinted Philosophia, Munich, 1980.
———. 1949. Human Action. A Treatise on Economics. London: Hodge and Company.
———. 1957. Theory and History. An Interpretation of Evolution and History. New Haven: Yale University Press.
———. 1960. Epistemological Problems of Economics. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
———. 1962. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. An Essay on Method. Van Nostrand, Princeton. 2nd edition reprinted Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, 2002.
Nau, Heino Heinrich. 2000. Gustav Schmoller’s Historico-Ethical Political Economy: Ethics, Politics and Economics in the Younger German Historical School, 1860–1917. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 7: 507–531.
Neurath, Otto. 1911. Nationalökonomie und Wertlehre, eine systematische Untersuchung. Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung 20: 52–114, reprinted in Neurath, Gesammelte ökonomische, soziologische und sozialpolitische Schriften I (ed. R. Haller and Ulf Höfer), Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, 1998: 470–518.
———. 1919. Wesen und Weg der Sozialisierung. In Neurath, Durch die Kriegwirtschaft zur Naturalwirtschaft, Callwey, Munich, 1919, 209–220. Trans. “Character and Course of Socialisation” in Neurath 1973: 135–150.
———, 1920a, Ein System der Sozialisierung.,Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 48, trans. A System of Socialisation” in Neurath 2004: 345–370.
———. 1920b. Vollsozialisierung. Diederichs, Jena. Trans. “Total Socialization” in Neurath 2004: 371–404.
———. 1925a. Wirtschaftsplan und Naturalrechnung. Laub, Berlin. Trans. Economic Plan and Calculation in Kind in Neurath 2004: 405–465.
———, 1925b, Sozialistische Nützlichkeitsrechung und kapitalistische Reingewinnrechnung. Der Kampf 18, trans. Socialist Utility Calculation and Capitalist Profit Calculation, in Neurath 2004: 466–472.
———, 1928, Lebensgestaltung und Klassenkampf, Laub, Berlin. Trans. Personal Life and Class Struggle in Neurath 1973: 249–298
———. 1937. Inventory of the Standard of Living. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6: 140–151. Reprinted in Neurath 2004: 513–526.
———. 1973. In Empiricism and Sociology, ed. M. Neurtah and R.S. Cohen. Dordrecht: Reidel.
———. 2004. In Economic Writings. Selections 1904–1945, ed. T.E. Uebel and R.S. Cohen. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Neurath, Otto, and Wolfgang Schumann. 1919. Können wir heute sozialisieren?Eine Darstellung der sozialistischen Lebensordnung und ihres Werdens. Leipzig: Klinkhardt.
Nozick, Robert. 1977. On Austrian Methodology. Synthese 36: 353–392.
O’Neill, John. 2012. Austrian Economics and the Limits of the Market. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36: 1073–1090.
O’Neill, John, and Thomas Uebel. 2004. Horkheimer and Neurath: Restarting a Disrupted Debate. European Journal of Philosophy 12: 75–105.
Ringer, Fritz. 1968. The Decline of the German Mandarins, The German Academic Community 1890–1933. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rudner, Richard. 1953. The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments. Philosophy of Science 20: 1–6.
Schäffle, Albert. 1875. Die Quintessenz des Sozialismus. Perthes, Gotha. Trans. The Quintessence of Socialism. London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1892.
Schmoller, Gustav. 1883. Die Schriften von K. Menger und W. Dilthey zur Methodologie der Staats- und Sozialwissenschaften. Jahrbuch fuer Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reich 7: 975–994. Reprinted In Schmoller, Zur Litteraturgeschichte der Staats- und Sozialwissenschaften. Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig, 1888: 275–304.
Smith, Barry. 1990. Aristotle, Menger, Mises: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Economics. In Caldwell 1990: 263–288.
Steel, Daniel. 2010. Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk. Philosophy of Science 77: 14–34.
Steele, D. 1992. From Marx to Mises. Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation. La Salle: Open Court.
Streissler, Erich. 1990a. The Influence of German Economics on the Work of Menger and Marshall. In Caldwell 1990: 31–68.
———. 1990b. Carl Menger on Economic Policy: The Lectures to Crown Prince Rudolf. In Caldwell 1990: 107–131.
Uebel, Thomas. 2005. Incommensurability, Ecology and Planning. Neurath in the Socialist Calculation Debate, 1919–1928. History of Political Economy 37: 309–341.
Weber, Max. 1921. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Mohr (Siebeck), Tübingen, 4th rev. ed. by J. Winckelmann, 1956. Transl. Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (ed. by. G. Roth and C. Wittich), Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uebel, T. (2017). Values, Facts and Methodologies. A Case Study in Philosophy of Economics. In: Stadler, F. (eds) Integrated History and Philosophy of Science. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53258-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53258-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53257-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53258-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)