Abstract
In this book, we regard the initiatives of creative communities as a matter of infrastructuring and this involves considering what kind of process might support these activities towards a transformation into working public-interest services. We loosely tested with this process within the ‘Creative Citizens’ project and, to a lesser extent, within ‘Welcome to St Gilles’, ‘Green Camden’ and ‘The NYC Office for Public Imagination’: we built it on the go, adapting the process step by step, without a fixed sequence of actions, just setting the ‘weak framework conditions’ in order to make things happen. This is a critical chapter of the book: we attempted to outline the whole journey into an infrastructuring process of ten main phases, from the first step of meeting a community of active citizens to the implementation stage focusing on service legacy and legitimacy. Hence, after having identified the characteristics of a collaborative infrastructure in the previous chapter, we now describe how such an infrastructure becomes an on-going process of infrastructuring a set of resources and actors in a specific context and timeframe that, hopefully, can be applied to other situations. This also means dealing with the issue of possible replication of such processes, which is why, at the end of the chapter, we compare our infrastructuring path to other frameworks in which citizen participation and design intervention play a central role.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
For further information on Transition see http://transitionproject.eu.
- 2.
For further information on Benisi see http://www.benisi.eu.
- 3.
For further information on Wilco see http://www.wilcoproject.eu.
- 4.
For further information on Tepsie see http://www.tepsie.eu.
References
Ansel C, Gash A (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theor 18(4):543–571
Bauwens M (2012) Evolving towards a partner state in an ethical economy. In: Botero A, Paterson AG, Saad Sulonen J (eds) Towards peer production in public services: cases from Finland. Aalto University, Helsinki, pp 32, 39, 40. Available at: Retrieved 5 Aug 2015 from http://books.aalto.fi
Björgvinsson E, Ehn P, Hillgren PA (2010) Participatory design and democratizing innovation. In: Proceedings of participatory design conference 2010
Blomkvist J, Holmlid S (2010) Service prototyping according to practitioners. In: Clatworthy S, Nisula JV, Holmlid S (eds) Proceedings of 2nd service design and service innovation conference. ServDes 2010, ExChanging Knowledge. Linköping, Sweden, December, 1–3, pp 1–12
Blomkvist J, Holmlid S, Sandberg F, Westerlund BO (2012) Exploring participatory prototyping of services. In: Proceedings of the 12th participatory design conference: exploratory papers, workshop descriptions, industry cases—volume 2. Roskilde, Denmark, August 12–16
Boyle D, Harris M (2009) The challenge of co-production. Discussion paper by Nef, Nesta and the Lab, publications. Available at: Retrieved 5 Aug 2015 from http://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/312ac8ce93a00d5973_3im6i6t0e.pdf, p 11
Callon M, Latour B (1981) Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Knorr K, Cicourel A (eds) Advances in social theory and methodology. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp 277–303
Cantù D, Selloni D (2013) From engaging to empowering people: a set of co-design experiments with a service design perspective. Social frontiers: the next edge of social innovation research. Research papers for a major new international social research conference. NESTA
Ceschin F (2013) Sustainable product-service systems: between strategic design and transition studies. Springer, New York
Ceschin F (2012) The societal embedding of sustainable PSS. Ph.D. Thesis, Doctorate in Design—Politecnico di Milano
Coughlan P, Fulton Suri J, Canales K (2007) Prototypes as (design) tools for behavioral and organizational change: a design-based approach to help organizations change work behaviors. J Appl Behav Sci 43(1):122–134
Davies A, Simon J (2013) Engaging citizens in social innovation: a short guide to the research for policy makers and practitioners. A deliverable of the project: ‘The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe’ (TEPSIE), European commission—7th framework programme. European Commission, DG Research, Brussels, p 8
Dewey J (1927) The public and its problems. Holt, New York
Donahu JD, Zeckhaus R (2011) Collaborative governance: private roles for public goals in turbulent times. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 9
Ehn P (2008) Participation in design things. In: Proceedings of the 10th anniversary conference on participatory design. ACM, New York
Fesmire S (2003) John Dewey and moral imagination. pragmatism in ethics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, p 67
Fischer F (2012) Participatory governance: from theory to practice. In: Levi-Faur D (eds) The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press Inc, New York. (Oxford Handbooks in Politics & International Relations) pp 457–471
Fuad-Luke A (2009) Design activism: beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world. Earthscan, London
Hillgren PA, Seravalli A, Eriksen MA (2016) Counter-hegemonic practices: dynamic interplay between Agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strateg Des Res J 9(2):89–99
International Association for Public Participation (2007) Spectrum of public participation. Available at: Retrieved on 8 Dec 2016 from http://www.fgcu.edu/Provost/files/IAP_Public_Participation_Spectrum.pdf
Jégou F, Manzini E (2008) Collaborative services. Social innovation and design for sustainability. Edizioni Polidesign, Milano
Landry C (2009) City making. L’Arte di fare città. Codice edizioni, Torino, p 246
Manzini E (2015) Design, when everybody design. MIT Press, Cambridge
Margolin V (2012) Design and democracy in a troubled world. Lecture at the school of design, Carnegie Mellon University, 11 Apr 2012
Markussen T (2011) The disruptive aesthetics of design activism: enacting design between art and politics. In: Koskinen I, Härkäsalmi T, Mazé R, Matthews B, Lee JJ (eds)‘Making design matter!’ proceedings of the 4TH Nordic design research conference, p 3
Meroni A (ed) (2007) Creative communities. People inventing sustainable ways of living. Edizioni Polidesign, Milano
Meroni A (2008) Strategic design: where are we now? Reflection around the foundations of a recent discipline. Strateg Des Res J 1(1):31–38
Meroni A, Fassi D, Simeone G (2013) Design for social innovation as a form of design activism: an action format. social frontiers: the next edge of social innovation research. Research papers for a major new international social research conference. NESTA
Micelli S (2011) Futuro artigiano. Marsilio Editori, Venezia
Miettinen S, Rontti S, Jeminen J (2014) Co-prototyping emotional value. In: 19th DMI: academic design management conference design management in an era of disruption London, 2–4 Sept 2014
Panzar CJ, Willig DR (1981) The economies of scope. Am Econ Rev 71(2):268–272
Rae J (2007) Seek the magic with service prototypes. Bloomberg Businenssweek, 12 Sept 2007. Available at: Retrieved on 4 June 2015 from http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/sep2007/id20070912_418827.htm
Selloni D (2013) Service makers. City dwellers and designers creating a local distribution system. In: 10th European academy of design conference. Crafting the future. HDK, School of Design and Crafts, Göteborg, p 3
Selloni D (2014) Designing for public-interest services: citizen participation and collaborative infrastructures in times of societal transformation. Ph.D. Dissertation. Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
Star SL (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: Gasser L, Huhns M (eds) Distributed artificial intelligence, vol 2. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, pp 37–54
Steen M (2013) Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Des Issues 29(2)
Turnhout E, Van Bommel S, Aarts N (2010) How participation creates citizens: participatory governance as performative practice. Ecol Soc 15(4): art. 26. Available at: Retrieved on 7 Sept 2016 from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art26/
Vanleene D, Verschuere B, Voets J (2015) Benefits and risks of co-production. A preliminary literature review. Paper for the IIASC Conference on co-production of public services, Nijmegen June 2015. Available at: Retrieved on 25 Nov 2016 from https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/6909634/file/6909644
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Selloni, D. (2017). Infrastructuring by Design. In: CoDesign for Public-Interest Services. Research for Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53243-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53243-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53242-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53243-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)