Abstract
This chapter offers a more comprehensive framework for the heterogeneous scenario of public-interest services by briefly outlining the emergence of new forms of welfare that deal with greater citizen involvement. This is a global trend, occurring essentially because of austerity measures that push governments to deliver more value while reigning in expenditure. One possible solution is based on the idea of co-producing services with citizens: the theories of relational welfare, open welfare and second welfare build specifically on the fundamental concept of co-production. The idea of citizen involvement in the provision of public services is then transferred to more extensive participation in government activities, briefly outlining the theories of the entrepreneurial state, the partner state, and the P2P state. Finally, some criticisms are highlighted, in spite of the many enthusiastic voices surrounding this topic: citizen involvement can be understood as form of empowerment, but also as a form of ‘exploitation’ in which governments relinquish their responsibility, causing a dismantling of the welfare state, thus, launching a call for further research into this complex issue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bason C (2013) Designing co-production: discovering new business models for public services. In: International Design Management Research Conference. August 8J9 2012. Boston MA, USA
Bauwens M (2012) Evolving towards a Partner state in an ethical economy. In: Botero A, Paterson AG, Saad Sulonen J (eds) ‘Towards peer production in public services: cases from Finland’. Helsinki: Aalto University. Available at http://books.aalto.fi. Retrieved on 5 Aug 2015, pp 32, 39, 40
Birrel I (2014) Big society? Let me explain. Article posted on The the Guardian. Available at http://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2010/oct/08/big-society-i-wrote-speech#start-of-comments. Retrieved on 22 Oct 2015
Bologna Regulation (2014) Bologna regulation on collaboration between citizens and the city for the care and regeneration of urban commons. Available at http://www.labgov.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/bolognaregulation.pdf. Retrieved on 10 Sept 2015
Botero A, Paterson AG, Saad Sulonen J (eds) (2012) Towards peer production in public services: cases from Finland. Aalto University, Helsinki. Available at http://books.aalto.fi, p 6
Boyle D, Harris M (2009) The challenge of co-production. Discussion paper by Nef, Nesta and The Lab, publications. Available at http://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/312ac8ce93a00d5973_3im6i6t0e.pdf. Retrieved on 5 Aug 2015, pp 11, 14, 16
Christensen T, Laegreid P (eds) (2007) Transcending the new public management: the transformation of public sector reforms. Ashgate, Burlington, VT
Cottam H (2011) Relational welfare. Soundings 48. Available at http://www.participle.net/images/uploads/soundings48_cottam2.pdf. Retrieved on 19 Nov 2015, pp 134, 142
Cottam H (2013) From transactional welfare to relational welfare. Available at http://newstartmag.co.uk/articles/relational-welfare/. Retrieved on 11 Nov 2016
Cottam H, Dillon C (2014) Learning from London circle. Participle. Available at http://www.participle.net/includes/downloader/ODY3MDg1ZmFjYjgxNDViMDNjNjdhZGU4NTJlYmE2MTaQ9p5EOJWLYDaYUQ6Ov0RaM1ZaZXJnVGIzdHd4Z3d2QkRDRGJMa3RlODNzOWJ4L1VPcEJmWUY5TXYyZGIzRXlmNWFWTFF2UFdBcHlBdmRIWmcyNHpUVWJKaVJaOGcwMy9sMGZObFE9PQ. Retrieved on 2 Dec 2016
Cottam H, Leadbeater C (2004) Open welfare: designs on the public good. Design Council, London, p 1
Dunleavy P, Hood C (1994) From old public administration to new public management. Public Money Manage 14(3):9–16
Ferrera M, Maino F (2011) Il “secondo welfare” in Italia: sfide e prospettive. In Italianieuropei, n 3
Hartley J (2005) Innovation in governance and public services: past and present. Public Money Manage 25(1):27–34
Jégou F, Manzini E (2008) Collaborative services. Social innovation and design for sustainability. Edizioni Polidesign, Milano, p 32
Mazzucato M (2013) The entrepreneurial state: debunking private vs. public sector myths. Anthem press, London
Meroni A, Sangiorgi D (2011) Design for services. Gowerpublishing, Farnham, UK, p 133
Mulgan G, Albury D (2003) Innovations in the public sector. Cabinet Office, London. Available at http://www.sba.oakland.edu/faculty/mathieson/mis524/resources/readings/innovation/innovation_in_the_public_sector.pdf. Retrieved on 2 Dec 2016
Orsi C (2007) The political economy of reciprocity and the partner state. Nottingham peer production workshop, November 15–16, Nottingham Trent University. Available at https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Political_Economy_of_Reciprocity_and_the_Partner_State. Retrieved on 10 Sept 2014
Osborne SP (2010) The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. New York, Routledge
Ostrom (1996) Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Develop 24(6):1073–1087 (Elsevier Science Ltd Great Britain, p. 1073)
Pestoff V (2012) Innovations in public services: co-production and new public governance in Europe. In Botero A, Paterson AG, Saad Sulonen J (eds) ‘Towards peer production in public services: cases from Finland’. Helsinki. Available at http://books.aalto.fi. Retrieved on 5 Aug 2015
Zamagni S (2014) Dal dualismo alla co-produzione. Key-note speech at the conference ‘Le giornate di Bertinoro’. Forlì, Italy, 10 Oct 2014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Selloni, D. (2017). New Forms of Welfare: Relational Welfare, Second Welfare, Co-production. In: CoDesign for Public-Interest Services. Research for Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53243-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53243-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53242-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53243-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)