Skip to main content

Modelling Scientific Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Knowledge

Part of the book series: European Studies in Philosophy of Science ((ESPS,volume 4))

  • 531 Accesses

Abstract

The various methods to acquire knowledge are the basis of alternative models of science. With regard to science, one may speak of models in different senses, but the two main ones are models of science and models in science. Models of science are representations of how scientists build their theories. The chapter considers four models of science: the analytic-synthetic model, the hypothetico-deductive model, the semantic model, and the analytic model. Models in science are representations of empirical objects, phenomena, or processes of some area of science. The chapter discusses to what extent each of the above four models of science is capable of accounting for models in science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boltzmann, Ludwig. 1974. Theoretical physics and philosophical problems: Selected writings. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borges, Jorge Luis. 1975. Of exactitude in science. In Jorge Luis Borges, A universal history of infamy, 131. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvino, Italo. 1974. Invisible cities. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Collection of sand. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf. 1939. Foundations of logic and mathematics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolph. 1966. Philosophical foundations of physics: An introduction to the philosophy of science. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf. 2001. Logical syntax of language. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Lewis. 1996. Sylvie and Bruno concluded. In The complete illustrated Lewis Carroll, 457–674. Ware: Wordsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci, Carlo. 1998. Le ragioni della logica. Rome: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, Haskell Brooks. 1977. Foundations of mathematical logic. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles. 1903. More letters of Charles Darwin. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009a. The origin of species by means of natural selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009b. The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul K. 1975. Machamer on Galileo. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 5: 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob. 1960. The foundations of arithmetic: A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1967. Begriffsschrift, a formula language, modeled upon that of arithmetic, for pure thought. In From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931, ed. Jean van Heijenoort, 5–82. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo. 1968. Opere. Florence: Barbera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, Kurt. 1986–2002. Collected works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson. 1976. Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl Gustav. 2001. The philosophy of Carl G. Hempel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, Morris. 1985. Mathematics for the nonmathematician. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac. 1952. Opticks, or a treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections & colours of light. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novalis. 1996. Christianity or Europe. A fragment. In The early political writings of the German romantics, ed. Frederick Beiser, 59–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Notes for a romantic encyclopedia: Das Allgemeine Brouillon. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, George. 1954. Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, Bas. 2000. The false hopes of traditional epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60: 253–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, William. 1847. The philosophy of the inductive sciences, founded upon their history. London: Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1858. Novum organon renovatum. London: Parker.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cellucci, C. (2017). Modelling Scientific Knowledge. In: Rethinking Knowledge. European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53237-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics