Abstract
This chapter looks at the role of visual artists in urban change in Leipzig through the study of artists’ livelihoods and their engagement with the city in form of urban pioneering and professional development. Visual artists are actors of urban change in Leipzig because they share a sense of place attachment and common identity with the city. This leads to the attraction and retention of artists who are expanding and diversifying the existing cultural economy. Visual artists along with their exhibition and house projects have visible impact on the re-urbanisation of the city and the gentrification of specific neighbourhoods. This dynamic is strongly linked with urban shrinkage that Leipzig experienced after German reunification, which provided the experimental space and opportunity for a diversity of artistic livelihoods to emerge. However, currently the city is experiencing population growth due to its affordability and mythicised urban identity. Leipzig is renowned for its active visual arts scene embodied in the New Leipzig School movement and the renowned Leipzig Academy of Visual Arts, which is an incubator for artistic skill and talent. Previous research on the city’s attractiveness to cultural workers has identified strong personal networks, the diverse cultural offer and affordability of space as core factors for talent attraction and retention. Through qualitative methods, this research articulates causation, tensions and contradictions that describe the livelihoods of visual artists (including art students) within a complex urban setting that allows for positioning between artistic autonomy and commercial artistic practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The term ‘cultural workers’ as used in this essay refers to professionals in the CCIs as an occupational group which includes artists.
- 2.
These houses are referred to as ‘Gründerzeithäuser’ (founding epoch houses) representing housing stock built during the industrialisation period in Germany and Austria before the stock market crash in 1873.
- 3.
The New Leipzig School relates to the post-reunification climate of modern Germany and is closely linked with the ‘Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst Leipzig’. On grounds of its conceptual vagueness and imprecision mostly linked to a representational style of painting, most of the artists associated with it reject the classification as member. However, it is widely used as a label and marketing tool in the world of art dealership.
References
Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., & Szelényi, I. (2008). Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. London and Cambridge MA: John Wiley and Sons.
Banks, M., Lovatt, A., O’Connor, J., & Raffo, C. (2000). Risk and trust in the cultural industries. Geoforum, 31(4), 453–464.
Bernet, T. (2011). Bunte Grauzone: Eine Ethnographie lokaler Akteure der Stadtentwicklung in Leipzig-Lindenau. Lizenziatsarbeit der Philosophischen (Fakultät ed.). Zurich: Universität Zürich.
Bismarck, B. V., & Koch, A. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond education. Kunst, Ausbildung, Arbeit und Ökonomie, Leipzig: Revolver-Archiv für aktuelle Kunst.
Bontje, M. (2005). Facing the challenge of shrinking cities in East Germany: The case of Leipzig. GeoJournal, 61(1), 13–21.
Bundschuh, A. (2010). Gentrification in ostdeutschen Städten? Das Beispiel Leipzig. anne.qsdf.org/dateien/Gentrification-in-Ostdeutschland.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
Champion, T. (2001). Urbanization, suburbanization, counterurbanization and reurbanization. In R. Paddinson (Ed.), Handbook of Urban Studies (pp. 143–161). London: Sage.
Clemens, H. (2015). “Wage keine Prognose mehr”—Forscher Rink über Leipzigs Wachstum und die Folgen. http://www.lvz.de/Leipzig/Lokales/Wage-keine-Prognose-mehr-Forscher-Rink-ueber-Leipzigs-Wachstum-und-die-Folgen. Accessed 1 September 2015.
Cloke, P., Cook, I., Crang, P., Goodwin, M., Painter, J., & Philo, C. (2004). Practising human geography. London: Sage.
Comunian, R. (2010). Rethinking the creative city: The role of complexity, networks and interactions in the urban creative economy. Urban Studies, 48, 1157–1179.
Comunian, R., & Faggian, A. (2014). Creative graduates and creative cities: Exploring the geography of creative education in the UK. International Journal of Cultural and Creative Industries, 1(2), 19–34.
Comunian, R., Faggian, A., & Li, Q. C. (2010). Unrewarded careers in the creative class: The strange case of bohemian graduates. Papers in Regional Science, 89(2), 389–410.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class: the new global competition for talent. New York: Harper Business.
Geertz, C. (1994). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science (pp. 213–231). MIT Press.
Haase, A., Herfert, G., Kabisch, S., & Steinführer, A. (2012). Reurbanizing Leipzig (Germany): Context conditions and residential actors (2000–2007). European Planning Studies, 20(7), 1173–1196.
Harris, A., & Moreno, L. (2010). Creative city limits: Urban cultural economy in a New Era of Austerity. London: UCL Urban Lab.
Kagan, S., & Hahn, J. (2011). Creative cities and (un)sustainability: From creative class to sustainable creative cities. Culture and Local Governance, 3(1), 11–27.
Krätke, S. (2010). ‘Creative cities’ and the rise of the dealer class: A critique of Richard Florida’s approach to urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 835–853.
Landry, C., & Bianchini, F. (1995). The creative city. London: Demos.
Lange, B., Burdack, J., Thalmann, R., Manz, K., Nadler, R., & Dziuba, C. (2008). Creative Leipzig. Understanding the attractiveness of the metropolitan region for creative knowledge workers. Amsterdam: AMIDSt University of Amsterdam.
Ley, D. (2003). Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2527–2544.
Lugosi, P., Bell, D., & Lugosi, K. (2010). Hospitality, culture and regeneration: Urban decay, entrepreneurship and the ‘ruin’ bars of Budapest. Urban Studies, 51, 170–184.
Mace, A., Gallent, N., Hall, P., Porsch, L., Braun, R., & Pfeiffer, U. (2004). Shrinking to grow? The urban regeneration challenge in Leipzig and Manchester. Town Planning Review, 77(5), 625–634.
Markusen, A. (2006a). The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialisation and economic development implications. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1661–1686.
Markusen, A. (2006b). Urban development and the politics of a creative class: Evidence from a study of artists. Environment and Planning, 38(10), 1921–1940.
New York Times (2010). The 31 places to go in 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/travel/10places.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1. Accessed 10 Apr 2015.
Novy, J., & Colomb, C. (2013). Struggling for the right to the (Creative) City in Berlin and Hamburg: New urban social movements, new ‘Spaces of Hope’? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1816–1838.
O’Connor, J., & Shaw, K. (2014). What next for the creative city? City, Culture and Society, 5(3), 165–170.
Oakley, K., Sperry, B., & Pratt, A. C. (2008). The art of innovation: How fine arts graduates contribute to innovation. London: NESTA.
Oakley, K. (2009). From Bohemia to Britart–art students over 50 years. Cultural Trends, 18(4), 281–294.
Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.
Plöger, J. (2007). Leipzig city report. CASE Report, 42. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
Pratt, A. C. (2004). Creative clusters: Towards the governance of the creative industries production system? Media International Australia, 112, 50–66.
Pratt, A. C. (2008). Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class”. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90(2), 107–117.
Pratt, A. C. (2011). The cultural contradictions of the creative city. City, Culture and Society, 2(3), 123–130.
Raabe, M., & M. Waltz. (2014). Swinging Leipzig: Subkulturelles image und marketing http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/swinging-leipzig-subkulturelles-image-und-marketing.1170.de.html?dram:article_id=275496. Accessed 22 Apr 2014.
Rehberg, K., & Schmidt, H. (2009). 60/40/20 Kunst in Leipzig seit 1949. Leipzig: Seemann.
Rödel, P., Czarnecki, C., & L. Ruske. (2014). AG zeitgenössische künstlerische Lehre. www.hgb-leipzig.de/agzkl/. Accessed 1 Apr 2015.
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10.
Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.
Leipzig, S. (2009). Leipzig 2020: Integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept (SEKo). Leipzig: Stadt Leipzig Dezernat Stadtentwicklung und Bau.
Leipzig, S. (2010). Die ‘Kreative Szene’ im Leipziger Westen: Eine Untersuchung über den Einfluss der Kreativen in Plagwitz/Lindenau auf die Stadtteilentwicklung. Wechselwirkungen zwischen Gebietsstrukturen und Szene sowie potenzielle Ansätze zur Entwicklungsverstätigung, Leipzig: Stadtplanungsamt Leipzig Abteilung West.
Leipzig, S. (2012). Kreative Zukunft: Werkstatt zur Entwicklung des Leipzier Westens. Projekt Creative Cities (INTERREG IV B), Leipzig: Stadt Leipzig, Amt für Stadterneuerung und Wohnungsbauförderung.
Leipzig, S. (2013). Statistischer Quartalsbericht 4/2013. Leipzig: Stadt Leipzig, Amt fuer Statistik und Wahlen.
Leipzig S. (2014). Kommunale Gebietsgliederung. http://www.leipzig.de/buergerservice-und-verwaltung/unsere-stadt/gebietsgliederung-und-strassennamen/kommunale-gebietsgliederung/#c22822. Accessed 8 Sept 2015.
Steets, S. (2007). Wir sind die Stadt!: kulturelle Netzwerke und die Konstitution städtischer Räume in Leipzig. Campus-Verlag.
Svob-Dokic, N. (2004). Cultural transitions in Southeastern Europe. Zagreb: Institute for International Relations.
Thomas, D., Fuhrer, U., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2008). Akteure der Gentrification und ihre Ortsbindung. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 60(2), 340–367.
Tracy, S. J. (2012). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Vickery, J. (2011). Beyond the creative city—cultural policy in an age of scarcity. Birmingham: MADE Centre for place-making.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wießner, R. (1999). Urban development in East Germany. Specific features of urban transformation processes. GeoJournal, 49(1), 43–51.
Wiest, K., & Hill, A. (2004). Sanfte Gentrifizierung, Studentifizierung und Inseln ethnischer Konzentration in ostdeutschen Innenstadtrandgebieten? Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 62(6), 361–374.
Wilson, D., & Keil, R. (2008). The real creative class. Social and Cultural Geography, 9(8), 841–847.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jacobi, S. (2017). Leipzig’s Visual Artists as Actors of Urban Change. In: Murzyn-Kupisz, M., Działek, J. (eds) The Impact of Artists on Contemporary Urban Development in Europe. GeoJournal Library, vol 123. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53217-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53217-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53215-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53217-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)