Skip to main content

Theorising Artists as Actors of Urban Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Impact of Artists on Contemporary Urban Development in Europe

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 123))

Abstract

This chapter provides a conceptual and theoretical background and ‘sets the scene’ for other chapters in the book. It discusses key terms and ideas recurring in the volume, such as the concept of an artist, as well as the inclusion of artistic professions in broader professional categories. Simultaneously, it aims to offer a comprehensive review of existing literature on the impact of artists on urban transformations, and inquires into the visibility of artists in the discourse on urban development as well as their (often stereotypically defined) roles in the processes of urban change, in particular in the context of contemporary challenges faced by cities in Europe.

I’m afraid we are a useless lot … But I—but we—what service are we … to our fellow men?

My opinion is exactly the opposite of the one he is expressing. I believe that artists are the most useful men in existence.

(conversation between sculptors Antoine Bourdelle and Auguste Rodin quoted by Gsell 1911: 387).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Though it also has to be acknowledged that some artists may actually not like to live in urban centres. Quite the opposite, they may be considered counter-urbanites (Mitchell et al. 2004).

  2. 2.

    In other classifications, such as the International Standard Classification of Occupations used in the EU (ILO 2007) or US Standard Occupational Classification (BLS 2009), artistic professions are grouped differently, according to their traditional or non-traditional character, and taking into account whether creative or technical input plays a greater role in the artistic activities of a particular professional group.

  3. 3.

    They have always been to some extent involved in cooperation networks with non-creative firms in diverse traditional industries, for example in industrial design, though their role in new industries seems to be even more important.

  4. 4.

    Though the two processes are not synonymous, there are many similarities between them in terms of the social and functional changes that take place in formerly underused, degraded or problem areas.

References

  • Allinson, J. (2006). Over-educated, over-exuberant and over here? The impact of students on cities. Planning, Practice and Research, 1, 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosino, C. (2013). Portrait de l’artiste en créateur de ville. L’exemple du quartier artistique de South Shoreditch à Londres. Territoire en mouvement, 17–18, 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoyama, Y. (2009). Artists, tourists and the state: Cultural tourism and the Flamenco Industry in Andalusia, Spain. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 80–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B., & Hansen, H. K. (2009). Knowledge bases, talents, and contexts: On the usefulness of the creative class approach in Sweden. Economic Geography, 85(4), 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, A. L. (2003). Constructing contemporary artistic identities in Toronto neighbourhoods. The Canadian Geographer, 3, 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, A. L. (2006). Resisting the creation of forgotten places: Artistic production in Toronto neighbourhoods. The Canadian Geographer, 4, 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, L. (2011). Environmental art as eco-cultural restoration. In D. Egan, E. E. Hjerpe, & J. Abrams (Eds.). Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration. Integrating Science, Nature, and Culture (pp. 299–312). Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D., & Jayne, M. (Eds.). (2004). City of quarters, urban villages in the contemporary city. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou, F. (2003). Artists’ labour markets. In R. Towse (Ed.), A handbook of cultural economics (pp. 69–75). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. (2010). State of play: Live original music venues in Western Australia. Perfect Beat, 11(1), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini, F., & Parkinson, M. (Eds.). (1993). Cultural policy and urban regeneration. The West European experience. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bille, T. (2010). Cool, funky and creative? The creative class and preferences for leisure and culture. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 4, 466–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bille, T., & Schulze, G. G. (2011). Culture in urban and regional development. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture (pp. 1051–1099). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLS. (2009). 2010 Standard Occupational Classification. Washington: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boichot, C. (2013). Les espaces de la création artistique à Paris et Berlin: Entre pôle artistique et centralité urbaine. Territoire en mouvement, 19–20, 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borén, T., & Young, C. (2013a). Getting creative with the ‘creative city’? Towards new perspectives on creativity in urban policy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1799–1815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borén, T., & Young, C. (2013b). The migration dynamics of the “creative class”: Evidence from a study of artists in Stockholm, Sweden. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(1), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borggren, J. (2010). In search of creative milieu: Creative peoples workplaces and residences in Göteborg. RESER 2010 Conference, The Resilience of the Global Service Economy, Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan-Horley, C. (2010). Multiple work sites and city-wide networks: A topological approach to understanding creative work. Australian Geographer, 41(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan-Horley, C., & Gibson, C. (2009). Where is creativity in the city? Integrating qualitative and GIS methods. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2595–2614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. (2000). Bobos in paradise: The new upper class and how they got there. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, T. P. R. (2015). Social movements, cultural production, and protests. São Paulo’s shirting political landscape. Current Anthropology, 56(Supplement 11), S126–S136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S., & Coaffee, J. (2005). Arts, gentrification and regeneration–From artist as pioneer to public arts. International Journal of Housing Policy, 1, 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, T. (2007). Sculpting the social geography of Lower Manhattan: Artists and AIDS activists in the 1980s and 1990s. UCLA Critical Planning, 14, 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerval, A. (2008). La gentrification à Paris intra-muros: Dynamiques spatiales, rapports sociaux et politiques publiques. Thèse de doctorat en géographie, Université de Paris 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. B. (1987). Artists and urban redevelopment. Geographical Review, 77(4), 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collet, A. (2008). Les «gentrifieurs» du Bas Montreuil: Vie résidentielle et vie professionnelle. Espaces et sociétés, 132–133, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colomb, C. (2012). Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comunian, R., Faggian, A., & Li, Q. C. (2010). Unrewarded careers in the creative class: The strange case of bohemian graduates. Papers in Regional Science, 89(2), 389–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comunian, R., Faggian, A., & Jewell, S. (2011). Winning and losing in the creative industries: An analysis of creative graduates’ career opportunities across creative disciplines. Cultural Trends, 20(3–4), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currid, E. (2007). How art and culture happen in New York. Implications for urban economic development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(4), 454–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currid, E. (2008). The Warhol economy: How fashion, art, and music drive New York City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currid, E., & Williams, S. (2010). The geography of buzz: Art, culture and the social milieu in Los Angeles and New York. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czornik, M. (2012). Konsumpcja miejska. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debroux, T. (2009). Géographie des artistes dans les régions urbaines en Belgique. Belgeo, 2, 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debroux, T. (2013a). Inside and outside the city. An outline of the geography of visual artists in Brussels (19th–21st centuries), Brussels Studies 69, www.brusselsstudies.be

  • Debroux, T. (2013b). Les territoires créatifs: Quelques notions théoriques et une analyse bruxelloise. Territoire en mouvement, 19–20, 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman, H. (2008). Sustainability, art and reflexivity: Why artists and designers may become key change agents in sustainability. In S. Kagan & V. Kirchberg (Eds.), Sustainability: A new frontier for the arts and cultures (pp. 108–146). Frankfurt am Main: VAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, G. (2003). ‘This place gives me space’: Place and creativity in the creative industries. Geoforum, 34(4), 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Działek, J., & Murzyn-Kupisz, M. (2014a). Is Krakow attractive to young members of the creative class? Urban policy implications. In D. Wiktor-Mach & P. Radwański (Eds.), The idea of creative city. The urban policy debate (pp. 69–83). Kocani: European Scientific Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Działek, J., & Murzyn-Kupisz, M. (2014b). Young artists and the development of artistic quarters in Polish cities. Belgeo 3. http://belgeo.revues.org/13012. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • Ehrenfeucht, R., & Nelson, M. (2013). Young professionals as ambivalent change agents in New Orleans after the 2005 Hurricanes. Urban Studies, 50(4), 825–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eikhof, D. R., & Haunschild, A. (2007). For art’s sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 28, 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D., & Caldwell-Wenman, A. (2015). The role of antagonism in the identities of professional artistic workers. In Ch. E. Shalley, M. A. Hitt, & J. Zhou (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship (pp. 103–120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2014). Policy handbook on artists’ residencies. Working group of EU member states experts on artists’ residences. European Agenda for Culture. Work plan for culture 2011–2014. http://ec.europa.eu/culture/policy/cultural-creative-industries/documents/artists-residencies_en.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • European Parliament. (2006). The status of artists in Europe. Brussels: European Parliament. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2006/375321/IPOL-CULT_ET%282006%29375321_EN.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • Evans, G. (2001). Cultural planning: An urban renaissance?. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5/6), 959–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2009). Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy. Urban Studies, 46(5–6), 1003–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendrich, L. (2005). A portrait of the artist as a young mess. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(39), 1–6. http://lauriefendrich.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/A_Portrait_of_the_Artist.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • Finn, D. (2014). DIY urbanism: implications for cities. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustanability, 7(4), 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2012). The rise of the creative class, revisited. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (1986). Les professions artistiques comme défi à l’analyse sociologique. Revue française de sociologie, 27(3), 431–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., & Pommerehne, W. (1989). Muses and markets: Explorations in the economics of the arts. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabe, T., & Abel, J. R. (2011). Agglomeration of knowledge. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1353–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaztambide-Fernández, R. A. (2008). The artists in society: Understandings, expectations and curriculum implications. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(3), 233–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornostaeva, G., & Campbell, N. (2012). The creative underclass in the production of place: Example of Camden Town in London. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravereau, S. (2013). Les artistes de Belleville: Valeur et faire-valoir d’un quartier de Paris à leurs dépens ? Territoire en mouvement, 17–18, 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, N. (1999). Artists in the East End 1968–1980. Rising East, 3(2), 20–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodach, C. (2010). Art spaces in community and economic development: Connections to neighbourhoods, artists, and the cultural economy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(1), 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodach, C. (2013). Toward sustainable culture-led regeneration. In M. E. Leary & J. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge companion to urban regeneration (pp. 505–514). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, J., & Corijn, E. (2005). Reclaiming urbanity: Indeterminate spaces, informal actors and urban agenda setting. Urban Studies, 42(3), 503–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gsell, P. (1911). Are artists a useless lot? Fine Arts Journal, 24(6), 386–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase, A., Grossmann, K., & Steinführer, A. (2012). Transitory urbanities: New actors of residential change in Polish and Czech inner cities. Cities, 29(5), 318–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2012). Art and gentrification: pursuing the urban pastoral in Hoxton, London. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 226–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London, New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauge, A., & Hracs, B. J. (2010). See the sound, hear the style: Collaborative linkages between indie musicians and fashion designers in local scenes. Industry and Innovation, 17(1), 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heebels, B., & van Aalst, I. (2010). Creative clusters in Berlin: Entrepreneurship and the quality of place in Prenzlauer Berg and Kreuzberg. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 92(4), 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, J., & Gray, Ch M. (2001). The economics of art and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heinich, N. (2004). La sociologie de l’art. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. (2014). Artists and cultural workers in Canadian municipalities. Statistical Insights on the Arts, 13(1). http://www.hillstrategies.com/sites/default/files/Artists_CW_municipal2011.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • Hou, J. (2010). (Not) your everyday public space. In J. Hou (Ed.), Insurgent public space: Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities (pp. 1–16). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, R. (2009). New residents–New city. The role of urban activists in the transformation of Inner City Melbourne. Urban Policy and Research, 27(3), 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hracs, B. J. (2009). Beyond bohemia: Geographies of everyday creativity for musicians in Toronto. In T. Edensor, D. Leslie, S. Millington, & N. Rantisi (Eds.), Spaces of vernacular creativity: Rethinking the cultural economy (pp. 75–88). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hracs, B. J., Grant, J. L., Haggett, J., & Morton, J. (2011). A tale of two scenes: Civic capital and retaining musical talent in Toronto and Halifax. The Canadian Geographer, 55(3), 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, T. A. (2006). Spatiality, built form, and creative industry development in the inner city. Environment and Planning A, 38(10), 1819–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (2007). Resolution concerning updating the International Standard Classification of Occupations. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. H. (2006). Artistic community and urban development in 1920s Montmartre. French Politics, Culture & Society, 24(2), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffri, J. (1988). Artists as consumers. American Demographics, April 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffri, J. (2004). Research on the individual artist: Seeking the solitary singer. Journal of Arts Management Law and Society, 34(1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. C. (2009). Cultural capitals: Revaluing the arts, remaking urban spaces. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juskowiak, P. (2011). Gentrification, art and creative sabotage in Poznan and Warsaw. https://www.inter-disciplinary.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/juskowiakupaper.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • Kagan, S. (2008). Art effectuating social change: Double entrepreneurship in conventions. In S. Kagan & V. Kirchberg (Eds.), Sustainability: A new frontier for the arts and cultures (pp. 147–193). Frankfurt am Main: VAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. (2011). Art and sustainability. Connecting patterns for a culture of complexity. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S., & Hahn, J. (2011). Creative cities and (un)sustainability: From creative class to sustainable creative cities. Culture and Local Governance, 3(102), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, S. (1998). How to identify artists? Defining the population for ‘status-of-the-artist’ studies. Poetics, 26, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., & Reid, N. (2014). The new urban world: Challenges and policy. Applied Geography, 49, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krätke, S. (2010). ‘Creative Cities’ and the rise of the dealer class: A critique of Richard Florida’s approach to urban theory. Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 835–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krätke, S. (2011). The creative capital of cities: Interactive knowledge creation and the urbanization economies of innovation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, C. (2008). The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovations. London, Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larner, W., & Butler, M. (2007). The places, people and politics of partnership: After neoliberalism in Aotearoa New Zealand. In H. Leitner, J. Peck, & E. S. Sheppard (Eds.), Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers (pp. 71–89). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavanga, M. (2013). Artists in urban regeneration processes: use and abuse? Territoire en movement, 17–18, 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, P., Murphy, E., & Redmond, D. (2012). Residential preferences of the ‘creative class’? Cities, 31, 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. E. (2013). Introduction. In M. E. Leary & J. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge companion to urban regeneration (pp. 489–493). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, L. (2003). Super-gentrification: The case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2487–2509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees, L., Slater, T., & Wyly, E. K. (2008). Gentrification. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lena, J. C., & Lindemann, D. J. (2014). Who is an artist? New data for an old question. Poetics, 43, 70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, C. (2007). Provoking democracy: Why we need the arts. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D. (1996). The new middle class and the remaking of the central city. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D. (2003). Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2527–2544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingo, E. L., & Tepper, S. J. (2013). Looking back, looking forward: Arts-based careers and creative work. Work and Occupations, 40(4), 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, R. (2004). The neighborhood in cultural production: Material and symbolic resources in the new bohemia. City & Community, 4, 343–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, R. (2010). Neo-bohemia. Art and commerce in the post-industrial city. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, M., & Andersen, K. V. (2009). Centrality and creativity: Does Richard Florida’s creative class offer new insights into urban hierarchy? Economic Geography, 85(4), 363–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A., Knierbein, S., & Degros, A. (2014). A moment of transformation. In A. Madanipour, S. Knierbein, & A. Degros (Eds.), Public space and the challenges of urban transformation in Europe (pp. 1–8). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makagon, D. (2010). Bring on the shock troops: Artists and gentrification in the popular press. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 7(1), 26–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (2006). Urban development and the politics of a creative class: Evidence from a study of artists. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1921–1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A., Wassall, G. H., DeNatale, D., & Cohen, R. (2008). Defining the creative economy: Industry and occupational approaches. Economic Development Quarterly, 22(1), 24–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (2014). Creative cities: A 10-year research agenda. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(2), 567–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A., & King, D. (2003). The artistic dividend. The arts’ hidden contributions to regional development. Minneapolis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlet, M., & van Woerkens, C. (2005). Tolerance, aesthetics, amenities or jobs? Dutch city attraction to the creative class. Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute Discussion Paper Series 05–33, Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/USE/2006-1201-222704/05-33_2.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • Mathews, V. (2008). Artcetera: Narrativising gentrification in Yorkville, Toronto. Urban Studies, 45(13), 2849–2876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M. (2007). Contesting the neoliberalisation of urban governance. In H. Leitner, J. Peck, & E. S. Sheppard (Eds.). Contesting neoliberalism. Urban frontiers (pp. 90–115), New York and London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, C. (2012). Graffiti or street art? Negotiating the moral geographies of the creative city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menger, P.-M. (2014). The economics of creativity. Art and achievement under uncertainty. Cambridge MA, London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meusburger, P. (2009). Milieus of creativity: The role of places, environments, and spatial contexts. In P. Meusburger, J. Funke, & E. Wunder (Eds.), Milieus of Creativity. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Spatiality of Creativity (pp. 97–154). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. (2005). Interruptions: Testing the rhetoric of culturally led urban development. Urban Studies, 42(5/6), 889–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. J. A., Bunting, T. E., & Piccioni, M. (2004). Visual artists: Counter-urbanites in the Canadian countryside? The Canadian Geographer, 48(2), 152–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., & Karttunen, S. (1992). Why and how to define an artist? Types of definitions and their implications for empirical research results. In R. Towse & A. Khakee (Eds.), Cultural Economics (pp. 175–185). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, H., & Treskon, M. (2009). Changing art: SoHo, Chelsea and the dynamic geography of galleries in New York City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), 517–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mommaas, H. (2009). Spaces of culture and economy: Mapping the cultural-creative cluster landscape. In L. Kong & J. O’Connor (Eds.), Creative economies, creative cities, Asian–European Perspectives (pp. 45–59). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. (2003). Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration. Conceptualizing cultural quarters. Planning, Practice and Research, 4, 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. (2005). Beware ‘the creative class’. Creativity and wealth creation revisited. Local Economy, 20(4), 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. (2008). The new wealth of cities. City dynamics and the fifth wave. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., & Ren, X. (2012). The creative underclass: Culture, subculture, and urban renewal. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 127–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, R. (1983). De l’artisan au professionnel: l’artiste. Sociologie du Travail, 25(4), 388–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., Grodach, C., & Foster, N. (2015). The importance of neighborhood context in arts-led development. Community anchor or creative class magnet? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(1), 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murzyn, M. (2006). Kazimierz. The Central European experience of urban regeneration. Kraków: International Cultural Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murzyn-Kupisz, M. (2012). Cultural quarters as a means of enhancing the creative capacity of Polish cities? Some evidence from Cracow. Quaestiones Geographicae, 31(4), 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murzyn-Kupisz, M., & Działek, J. (2015). Libraries and museums as breeding grounds of social capital and creativity: potential and challenges in the post-socialist context. In S. Warren & P. Jones (Eds.), Creative economies, creative communities. Rethinking place, policy and practice (pp. 145–169). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musterd, D., & Murie, A. (Eds.). (2010). Making competitive cities. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, G., Wissinger, E., & Zukin, S. (2005). Entrepreneurial labor among cultural producers: “Cool” jobs in “hot” industries. Social Semiotics, 15(3), 307–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P., & Kourtit, K. (2013). The ‘new urban Europe’. European Planning Studies, 21(3), 291–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norcliffe, G., & Rendace, O. (2003). New geographies of comic book production in North America: The new artisan, distancing, and the periodic social economy. Economic Geography, 79(3), 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. New York: Marlowe & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osorio, A. E. (2013). Creative revitalization as a community affair. In M. M. Breitbart (Ed.), Creative economies in post-industrial cities: Manufacturing a (different) scene (pp. 183–208). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perloff, H. S. (1979). Using the arts to improve life in the city. Journal of Cultural Economics, 3(2), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. (2003). Unsettled sites: suspended attention. How is the city an issue for art? In L. Palmer (Ed.), 3 acres on the lake: DuSable Park Proposal Project (pp. 12–15). Chicago, IL: White Walls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanska, D. V., & Piotrowski, G. (2015). The transformative power of cooperation between social movements. Squatting and tenants’ movements in Poland. City, 19(2–3), 274–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. (2004). Creative clusters: Towards the governance of the creative industries production system? Media International Australia, 112, 50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. C. (2008). Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90(2), 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. C. (2011). The cultural contradictions of the creative city. City, Culture and Society, 2(3), 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przyblyski, J. (2010). Funny… it doesn’t look like insurgent space. The San Francisco Bureau of Urban Secrets and the practice of history as a public art. In J. Hou (Ed.), Insurgent public space: Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities (pp. 194–203). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. (2006). From ‘creative city’ to ‘no-go areas’. The expansion of the night-time economy in British town and city centres. Cities, 23(5), 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2000). The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration. In P. Roberts & H. Sykes (Eds.), Urban regeneration. A handbook (pp. 9–36), London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodhouse, S. (Ed.). (2010). Cultural quarters. Principles and practice. Bristol-Chicago: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegger, R. (2013). Urban prosumers: Network generated urban spaces. In H. T. Andersen & R. Atkinson (Eds.), Production and the use of urban knowledge (pp. 55–80). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, J. (2014). Sociology looks at the arts. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutten, P. (2006). Culture and urban regeneration. Findings and conclusions on the economic perspective. Lille: Urbact Culture Network. http://www.mdrl.ro/urbactII/urbact/projects/cultural_activities/UC-Perspective%20eco.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • Ryberg, S., Salling, M., & Soltis, G. (2013). Putting artists on the map: The geography of artists in Cuyahoga county, Ohio. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(2), 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, J. (Ed.). (2005). Removing unfreedoms: Citizens as agents of change in urban development. London: ITDG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schich, M., Song, C., Ahn, Y.-Y., Mirsky, A., Martino, M., Barabási, A.-L., et al. (2014). A network framework of cultural history. Science, 345(6196), 558–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (2010). Cultural economy and the creative field of the city. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, 92(2), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sholette G. (1998). News from nowhere: Activist art and after. A report from New York City. http://www.neme.org/354/news-from-nowhere. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • Silver, D., & Miller, D. (2013). Contextualizing the artistic dividend. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(5), 591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, D., Clark, T. N., & Graziul, C. (2011). Scenes, innovation, and urban development. In D. E. Andersson, A. E. Andersson, & C. Mellander (Eds.), Handbook of creative cities (pp. 229–258). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slach, O., Boruta, T., Bednar, P., & Koutský, J. (2013). Stodolní ulice à Ostrava: Un exemple de régénération du centre d’une ville post-socialiste en République tchèque. Naissance d’un quartier culturel ou d’un espace de consommation? Territoire en mouvement, 17–18, 52–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, A. J. (2011). The influence of district visual quality on location decisions of creative entrepreneurs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(2), 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Holt, L. (2007). Studentification and ‘apprentice’ gentrifiers within Britain’s provincial towns and cities: Extending the meaning of gentrification. Environment and Planning A, 1, 142–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1979). Toward a theory of gentrification a back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(4), 538–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Q., & Ambler, M. (2010). Europe’s city beaches as post-Fordist placemaking. Journal of Urban Design, 15, 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1997). The regional world. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryjakiewicz, T., & Stachowiak, K. (2010). Uwarunkowania, poziom i dynamika rozwoju sektora kreatywnego w poznańskim obszarze metropolitalnym. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryjakiewicz, T., & Męczyński, M. (2010). Atrakcyjność poznańskiego obszaru metropolitalnego dla pracujących w sektorze kreatywnym. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styhre, A., & Eriksson, M. (2008). Bring in the arts and get the creativity for free: A study of the artists in residence project. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwala, L. (2014). Kreativität, Kultur und Raum. Ein wirtschaftsgeographischer Beitrag am Beispiel des kulturellen Kreativitätsprozesses. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svirčić Gotovac, A., & Zlatar, J. (2015). Urban processes in Zagreb. Residential and commercial developments. Hrvatski Geografski glasnik, 77(1), 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, J. (2012). Space-run artists: Art activism and urban conflict in contemporary Barcelona. In J. Khonsary & K. L. Podesva (Eds.), Institutions by artists (pp. 129–145). Vancouver: Fillip Editions/Pacific Association of Artist Run Centres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szívós, E. (2011). Social history of fine arts in Hungary, 1867–1918. Wayne N.J.: Center for Hungarian Studies and Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E. (2015). Do-it-yourself urbanism: A history. Journal of Planning History, 14(2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (2008). The concentric circles model of the cultural industries. Cultural Trends, 3, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D., & Zednik, A. (2010). Do you really expect to get paid? An economic study of professional artists in Australia. Strawberry Hills: Australia Council for the Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomczak, P., & Stachowiak, K. (2015). Location patterns and location factors in the cultural and creative industries. Quaestiones Geographicae, 34(2), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Törnqvist, G. (1983). Creativity and the renewal of regional life. In Creativity and context: A seminar report (Vol. 50, pp. 91–112). Lund: Gleerup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnqvist, G. (2004). Creativity in time and space. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86(4), 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towse, R. (2002). Partly for the money: Rewards and incentives to artists. Kyklos, 54(2/3), 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, R. (2010). A textbook of cultural economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Traversier, M. (2009). Le quartier artistique, un objet pour l’histoire urbaine. Histoire urbaine, 3(26), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trebay, G. (1998). Out of the Garret. A new study examines the real economic life of artists. The Village Voice News, October 27. http://www.villagevoice.com/1998-10-27/news/out-of-the-garret/. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • UNESCO. 1980. Recommendation concerning the status of the artist, adopted by the General Conference at the twenty-first session, Belgrade, 27 October 1980. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001114/111428mo.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • van Criekingen, M., & Decroly, J. M. (2003). Revisiting the diversity of gentrification: Neighbourhood renewal processes in Brussels and Montreal. Urban Studies, 12, 2451–2468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visconti, L. M., Sherry, J. F., Borghini, S., & Anderson, L. (2010). Street art, sweet art? Reclaiming the ‘public’ in public place. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 511–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivant, E. (2009). How underground culture is changing Paris. Urban Research & Practice, 2(1), 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivant, E. (2010). The (re)making of Paris as a bohemian place? Progress in Planning, 74(3), 107–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivant, E., & Charmes, E. (2008). La gentrification et ses pionniers: le rôle des artistes off en question. Métropoles, 3, 29–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, N. (Ed.). (2000). The community planning handbook. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedd, K., Pettz, L., & Ross, C. (2001). Creative quarters: The art world in London from 1700 to 2000. London: Museum of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • While, A. (2003). Locating art worlds: London and the making of young British art. Area, 35(3), 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojan, T. R., Lambert, D. M., & McGranahan, M. (2007). Emoting with their feet: Bohemian attraction to the creative milieu. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 711–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldoff, R., DeCola, T., & Litchfield, R. (2011). The aspirational creative class: Urban residential preferences of college students in creative majors. City, Culture and Society, 2, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xuefei, R., & Meng, S. (2012). Artistic urbanization: Creative industries and creative control in Beijing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 504–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zebracki, M., & Smulders, L. (2012). Artists-accompanied urban regeneration: Insights and lessons from Utrecht and Rotterdam. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 103(5), 615–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, S. (2016). Artists and Shanghai’s culture-led urban regeneration. Cities, 56, 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimberg, A. (2013). Artful dodgers: urban interventionists Partizaning are taking back the streets. The Calvert Journal. http://calvertjournal.com/comment/show/433/partizaning-street-art-protest. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.

  • Zukin, S. (1989). Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. (1995). The cultures of cities. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. (2008). Consuming authenticity. From outposts of difference to means of exclusion. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 724–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. (2010). Naked city: Death and life of authentic urban spaces. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S., & Braslow, L. (2011). The life cycle of New York’s creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplanned cultural zones. City, Culture and Society, 2, 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The text was written as part of research carried out within the research project on ‘Activities of artists in post-socialist cities: socio-economic underpinnings and implications’ conducted in 2013–2017 and financed with a grant awarded by the National Science Centre, Poland, grant agreement no. UMO-2012/05/E/HS4/01601.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Murzyn-Kupisz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murzyn-Kupisz, M., Działek, J. (2017). Theorising Artists as Actors of Urban Change. In: Murzyn-Kupisz, M., Działek, J. (eds) The Impact of Artists on Contemporary Urban Development in Europe. GeoJournal Library, vol 123. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53217-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53217-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53215-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53217-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics