Abstract
Adopting a strategic relational approach, this chapter shows how—despite Turkey’s unfavorable initial conditions—external pressures differentially empowering civilians provided resources these civilians needed to break the stabilizing mechanisms of path-dependence in civil-military relations. The ability of civilians to overcome path-dependence were enhanced by over a decade of rule by a stable majority government with a strong will to erode the political clout of the military. Having successfully defanged the Turkish military and consolidated its hold on power, the civilian leadership’s interest in defense and military reform has, however, faded in the last few years. In addition to second-generation problems of constructing effective civilian-led defense policy-making with broader civil society input, as well as strengthening legislative oversight, Turkey today also faces the twin challenges of restoring the morale and corporate esteem of the officers and rebuilding a working relationship between military and civilian leaders based on mutual trust.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmad, F. (1993). The making of modern Turkey. London: Routledge.
Akmeşe, H. N. (2005). The birth of modern Turkey: The Ottoman military and the march to WWI. London & New York: I. B. Tauris.
Aknur, M. (2005). Civil-military relations in Turkey: Analysis of civilian leaders. Ph.D. Dissertation, Montreal: McGill University.
Anadolu Ajansi. (2016, August 1). Başbakan Yıldırım: ‘Genelkurmay Başkanı generaller arasından seçilecek’. Accessed August 2, 2016, from http://aa.com.tr/tr/15-temmuz-darbe-girisimi/basbakan-yildirim-genelkurmay-baskani-generaller-arasindan-secilecek/619234.
Bayramoğlu, A. (2004). Asker ve siyaset [Military and Politics]. In A. Insel & A. Bayramoğlu (Eds.), Bir zumre, bir parti. Turkiye’de ordu [A Class, a Party: Military in Turkey] (pp. 59–118). Birikim Yayinlari: Istanbul.
BBC. (2016, April 21). Turkey Ergenekon: Court Quashes ‘Coup Plot’ convictions. Accessed May 4, 2016, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36099889.
Bekdil, B. (2014, July 8). ‘Turkey could double its arms spending by 2018’. Hürriyet daily news. Accessed March 4, 2016, from http://www.Hurriyetdailynews.com/turkey-could-double-its-arms-spending-by-2018.aspx?pageID=238&nID=68806&NewsCatID=483.
Belkin, A., & Schofer, E. (2005). Coup risk, counterbalancing, and international conflict. Security Studies, 14(1), 140–177.
Biddle, S., & Long, S. (2004). Democracy and military effectiveness: A deeper look. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(4), 525–546.
Bilgiç-Ünlü, T. (2009). The military and Europeanization reforms in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 45(5), 803–824.
Brooks, R. A. (2006). An autocracy at war: Explaining Egypt’s military effectiveness, 1967 and 1973. Security Studies 15(3), 396–430.
Brooks, R., & Stanley, E. A. (2007). Creating military power: The sources of military effectiveness. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Çamlıbel, C. (2015, April 6). Senior ex-general hints at CIA involvement in Balyoz coup plot case. Hürriyet daily news. Accessed May 5, 2016, from http://www.Hurriyetdailynews.com/Default.aspx?pageID=238&nID=80615&NewsCatID=338.
Clarke, J. (2000). Contemporary Turkish politics: Challenges to democratic consolidation. Mediterranean Quarterly, 11(4), 168–170.
Cnnturk. (2016, July 25). Genelkurmay Baskani Hulusi Akar’in ifadesi. Accessed July 26, 2016, from http://www.cnnturk.com/turkiye/genelkurmay-baskani-hulusi-akarin-ifadesi?page=1.
Cottey, A., Edmunds, T., & Forster, A. (2002). The second generation problematic: Rethinking democracy and civil-military relations. Armed Forces & Society, 29(1), 31–56.
Cumhuriyet. (2016, July 28). Efkan Ala: Polisin ağır silahları olacak. Accessed August 1, 2016, from http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/siyaset/575556/Efkan_Ala__Polisin_agir_silahlari_olacak.htm.
Decree No. 668. (2016, July 27). Decree law on the state of emergency measures and regulations in some institutions and organizations. Resmi Gazete No. 29783. Accessed July 30, 2016, from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2016/07/20160727M2-1.pdf.
Decree No. 669. (2016, July 31). Decree law concerning the state of emergency measures, establishment of National Defense University, and amendments on some laws. Resmi Gazete No. 29787. Accessed August 3, 2016, from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2016/07/20160731.pdf.
Demirel, T. (2004). Soldiers and civilians: The dilemma of Turkish democracy. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(1), 127–150.
Diamond, L. (2002). Elections without democracy: Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35.
Duman, O., & Tsarouhas, D. (2006). ‘Civilianization’ in Greece vs. ‘Demilitarization’ in Turkey: A comparative study of the civil-military relations and the impact of EU conditionalities. Armed Forces & Society, 32(3), 403–426.
Eldem, T. (2013). Guardians entrapped: Demise of the Turkish armed forces as a veto-player. Ph.D. Dissertation, Toronto: University of Toronto.
Ergin, S. (2016, July 25). The promotion of naval colonels prevented by fictitious cases. Hürriyet daily news. Accessed July 25, 2016, from http://www.Hurriyetdailynews.com/the-promotion-of-naval-colonels-prevented-by-fictitious-cases.aspx?pageID=449&nID=102023&NewsCatID=428.
Faltas, S. (2012). The General, the Prime Minister and the Imam: Civil-military relations in Turkey today. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 11(1), 133–143.
Frank, C. (2002). Turkey’s admittance to the European Union: A keystone between continents. International Trade Law Journal, 11, 66–86.
Frey, F. W. (1965). The Turkish political elite. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.
Güney, A., & Karatekelioğlu, P. (2005). Turkey’s EU candidacy and civil-military relations: Challenges and prospects. Armed Forces & Society, 31(3), 439–462.
Günlük-Şenesen, G. (2002). 1980–2001 Turkiye’de savunma harcamaları ve ekonomik Etkiler. [Defense Expenditure and its Economic Effects in Turkey: 1980–2001]. Istanbul: TESEV.
Günlük-Şenesen, G., & Kırık, H. (2016). The AKP era: Democratization or resecuritization? An assessment of the institutional and budgetary reflections. Research & Policy on Turkey, 1(1), 75–87.
Gürsel, K. (2016, 22 July). Turkey’s failed coup reveals ‘army within an army’. Al Monitor. Accessed August 3, 2016, from http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/07/turkey-coup-attempt-shows-army-within-army.html#ixzz4FnJz59PU.
Hale, W. (1994). Turkish politics and the military. New York: Routledge.
Harris, G. (1965). The role of the military in Turkish politics: Part I. The Middle East Journal, 19(1), 54–66.
Hasan, A. (2009, November 30). Denizde bozulan 33 yillik teamul. Milliyet. Accessed June 5, 2016, from http://www.milliyet.com.tr/-deniz-de-bozulan----yillik%20teamul/guncel/gundemdetay/30.11.2009/1167837/default.htm.
HDN. (2014, July 18). Top Turkish Court paves way for retrial of Balyoz case convicts. Accessed May 6, 2016, from http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/top-turkish-court-paves-way-for-retrial-of-balyoz-coup-case-convicts.aspx?pageID=238&nid=67961
HDN. (2015, March 31). 236 Acquitted in Balyoz coup case. Doğan news agency. Accessed May 6, 2016, from http://www.Hurriyetdailynews.com/236-acquitted-in-balyoz-coup-case.aspx?PageID=238&NID=80408&NewsCatID=338 236 acquitted in Balyoz coup case.
HDN. (2016, July 26). Three ex-convicts of former coup case helped avert July 15 coup attempt, reports say. Hürriyet daily news. Accessed July 26, 2016, from http://www.Hurriyetdailynews.com/three-ex-convicts-of-former-coup-case-helped-avert-july-15-coup-attempt-reports-say--.aspx?pageID=238&nID=102093&NewsCatID=338.
Heper, M. (2005). The European Union, the Turkish military and democracy. South European Society & Politics, 10(1), 33–44.
Hürriyet. (2004, December 1). MGK’nın 71 yıllık kara kutusu acıldı. Accessed May 6, 2016, from http://www.Hurriyet.com.tr/mgknin-71-yillik-kara-kutusu-acildi-277698.
Hürriyet. (2009, December 5). TSK’dan 19 yılda bin 657 subay ihraç edildi. Accessed March 5, 2016, from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/tskdan-19-yilda-bin-657-subay-ihrac-edildi-13117949.
Hürriyet. (2011, August 27). Kosaner’den ses kayitlari ile aciklama. Accessed May 4, 2016, from http://www.Hurriyet.com.tr/kosanerden-ses-kayitlari-ile-ilgili-aciklama-18593840.
Hürriyet. (2014, August 6). Balyoz Sanıkları Emekli oldu. Accessed May 5, 2016, from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/balyoz-saniklari-emekli-oldu-26950946.
Hürriyet. (2015a, March 31). Balyoz Davası’nda Karar. Accessed May 6, 2016, from http://www.Hurriyet.com.tr/balyoz-davasinda-karar-28608212.
Hürriyet. (2015b, March 25). Org. Özel Savunma ve Havacılık Dergisi’ne konuştu. Accessed May 14, 2016, from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/org-ozel-savunma-ve-havacilik-dergisi-ne-konustu-28549591.
Hürriyet. (2016a, July 13). Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’dan TSK kanununa onay. Accessed July 14, 2016, from http://www.Hurriyet.com.tr/cumhurbaskani-Erdoğandan-tsk-kanununa-onay-40144333.
Hürriyet. (2016b, July 26). Deniz’den sonra Kara’da da benzer tablo: Darbe 2013’ten. Accessed July 26, 2016, from http://www.Hurriyet.com.tr/denizden-sonra-karada-da-benzer-tablo-darbe-2013ten-40171048.
Içgen, L. (2012, December 13). TSK’da rekor talep: 1067 Subay. Vatan. Accessed February 3, 2016, from http://www.gazetevatan.com/tsk-da-rekor-talep---1067-subay----499048-gundem/.
Jenkins, G. (2009). Between fact and fantasy: Turkey’s Ergenekon investigation. Washington, DC: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program (Silk Road Paper).
Jenkins, G. (2011). Ergenekon, Sledgehammer, and the Politics of Turkish Justice: Conspiracies and Coincidences. MERIA, 15(2), 29 August. Accessed May 3, 2016, from http://www.gloria-center.org/2011/08/Ergenekon-sledgehammer-and-the-politics-of-turkish-justice-conspiracies-and-coincidences.
Jenkins, G. (2014). The Ergenekon releases and prospects for the rule of law in Turkey. Turkey Analyst, 7(5). Accessed May 9, 2016, from http://www.turkeyanalyst.org/publications/turkey-analyst-articles/item/96-the-ergenekon-releases-and-prospects-for-the-rule-of-law-in-turkey.html.
Jenkins, G. (2016, July 22). Post-Putsch narratives and Turkey’s curious coup. Turkey Analyst. Accessed July 24, 2016, from http://www.turkeyanalyst.org/publications/turkey-analyst-articles/item/562-post-putsch-narratives-and-turkeys-curious-coup.html.
Karpat, K. (1970). The military and politics in Turkey, 1960–64: A socio-cultural analysis of a revolution. The American Historical Review, 75(6), 1654–1683.
Kemal, L. (2012). The parliamentary will remains weak. TESEV democratization program policy report series: Security sector 3. Istanbul: TESEV (Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation).
Kramer, H. (2000). A changing Turkey: The challenge to Europe and the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Kuloğlu, A., & Şahin, M. (2006). The past and the future of civil-military relations in Turkey. In S. Faltas & S. Jansen (Eds.), Governance and the military: Perspectives for change in Turkey (pp. 87–104). Groningen: Centre of European Security Studies (Harmonie Paper No. 19).
Larrabee, F. S., & Lesser, I. O. (2003). Turkish foreign policy in an age of uncertainty. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
Law No. 6519. (2014, February 22). The Law concerning changes in the military service law and changes in other laws and decree laws adopted on February 11, 2014. Resmi Gazete No: 28921. Accessed August 1, 2016, from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/02/20140222-1.htm.
Makara, M. (2013). Coup-proofing, military defection, and the Arab Spring. Democracy and Security, 9, 334–359.
Milliyet. (2014, January 6). Genelkurmaydan flas aciklamalar. Accessed May 9, 2016, from http://www.milliyet.com.tr/genelkurmay-dan-flas-aciklamalar/gundem/detay/1817976/default.htm.
Nassif, H. B. (2015). Generals and autocrats: How coup-proofing predetermined the military elite’s behavior in the Arab Spring. Political Science Quarterly, 130(2), 245–275.
Özbudun, E. (1996). Turkey: How far from consolidation? Journal of Democracy 7(3), 123–138.
Özbudun, E. (2000). Contemporary Turkish politics: Challenges to democratic consolidation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Özbudun, E., & Yazıcı, S. (2004). Democratization Reforms in Turkey: 1993–2004. Istanbul: TESEV.
Özcan, G. (2010). The changing role of Turkey’s Military in foreign policy-making. UNISCI Discussion Papers No, 23, 23–46.
Özdağ, U. (1991). Ordu-siyaset iliskisi: Ataturk ve inonu donemleri. [Military-Politics Relationship: Periods of Ataturk and Inonu]. Ankara: Gundogan.
Pilster, U., & Böhmelt, T. (2011). Coup-proofing and military effectiveness in interstate wars, 1967–99. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 28(4), 331–350.
Powell, J. (2012). Determinants of the attempting and outcome of coups d’État. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(6), 1017–1040.
Quinlivan, J. T. (1999). Coup-proofing: Its practice and consequences in the Middle East. International Security, 24(2), 131–165.
Rodrik, D. (2011). Ergenekon and Sledgehammer: Building or undermining the rule of law? Turkish Political Quarterly, 10(1), 99–109.
Rodrik, D., & Dogan, P. (2010). Balyoz: Bir darbe kurgusunun belgeleri ve gercekler. [Sledgehammer: Myths and Realities of a Coup]. Istanbul: Destek Yayınevi.
Roessler, P. (2011). The enemy within: Personal rule, coups and civil war in Africa. World Politics, 63(2), 300–346.
Rustow, D. (1964). The military. In R. Ward & D. Rustow (Eds.), Political modernization in Japan and Turkey (pp. 352–388). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sabah. (2012, June 27). Milli Savunma Bakanlığı sivilleşiyor. Accessed April 5, 2016, from http://www.sabah.com.tr/gundem/2012/06/27/milli-savunma-bakanligi-sivillesiyor.
Sakallıoğlu, C. U. (1997). The anatomy of Turkish military’s political autonomy. Comparative Politics, 29(2), 151–166.
Salt, J. (1999). Turkey’s military democracy. Current History, 98, 72–78.
Sarıgıl, Z. (2007). Europeanization as institutional change: The case of Turkish military. Mediterranean Politics, 12(1), 39–57.
Selvi, A. (2016, May 31). ‘The concept has changed in Turkey’s fight against terror’. Hürriyet daily news. Accessed June 1, 2016, from http://www.Hurriyetdailynews.com/the-concept-has-changed-in-turkeys-fight-against-terror-.aspx?PageID=238&NID=99861&NewsCatID=581.
SIPRI. (2016). Stockholm peace research institute, military expenditures data base 2016. Accessed June 25, 2016, from https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex.
Sözcü. (2013, April 14). Harbiyeli olmak istemiyorlar. Accessed February 1, 2016, from http://www.sozcu.com.tr/2013/gundem/harbiyeli-olmak-istemiyorlar-268945/.
Stepan, A. (1988). Rethinking military politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Taraf. (2014, April 11). Hava kuvvetlerinde 2119 asker tasfiye edildi. Accessed February 5, 2016, from http://arsiv.taraf.com.tr/haber-kart-hava-kuvvetlerinde-2-bin-119-asker-tasfiye-edildi-152426/.
Trimberger, E. K. (1978). Revolution from above: Military Bureaucrats and Development in Japan, Turkey, Egypt, and Peru. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Tsarouhas, D., & Duman Ö. (2006). Civilianization in Greece vs. demilitarization in Turkey: A comparative study of the civil-military relations and the impact of the European Union. Armed Forces & Society, 32(3), 403–426.
Turkish Ministry of National Defense. (1998). White paper-defense 1998. Ankara: Ministry of National Defense.
Turkish Ministry of National Defense. (2000). White paper-defense 2000. Ankara: Ministry of National Defense.
Yentürk, N. (2014). Measuring Turkish military expenditure. SIPRI insights on peace and security, No. 2014/1.
Yılmaz, H. (1997). Democratization from above in response to the international context. New Perspectives on Turkey, 17, 1–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eldem, T. (2017). Democratic Control and Military Effectiveness of the Turkish Armed Forces. In: Croissant, A., Kuehn, D. (eds) Reforming Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53189-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53189-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53188-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53189-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)