Skip to main content

Civil-Military Relations in Two “Third Wave” Democracies: The First and a Follower

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reforming Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies

Abstract

This chapter utilizes the framework described in the Introduction, which includes both democratic civilian control and military effectiveness, to compare and contrast the experiences of two “Third Wave” democracies: Portugal, which initiated the third wave on 25 April 1974, and Brazil, where the democratic transition began in 1985 with a civilian president coming into office following 21 years of military governments. The chapter argues that democratic civilian control has been achieved in both countries, but only in Portugal has military effectiveness also been sought. The chapter seeks to explain the differences in the two countries’ experiences based on the incentives of the civilian decision makers as defined in the very different strategic cultures of the two countries. The data utilized in this chapter comes from published books and articles, official documents, on-line resources, and personal interviews by the author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Abreu Coutinho Madruga (2015), gives examples of this attention on pp. 80–85.

References

  • Abreu Coutinho Madruga, F. A. (2015). O Congresso Nacional, as relações civis-militares e a política de defesa no Brasil (1999–2014). Doctoral Dissertation, Rio de Janeiro, School of Public Administration and Business, Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abreu de Moura, J. A. (2013). Defesa: O Brasil em Dois Tempos. Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval, 19(1), 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsina, J. P. S. (2009). O poder militar como instrument da política externa brasileira contemporânea. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 52(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsina, J. P. S. (2014). Rio Branco, grand strategy and naval power. Revista Brasileira de Política Interncional, 57(2), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsina, J. P. S. (2015). Rio-Branco: grande estratégia e o poder naval. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertonha, J. F. (2010). Brazil: An emerging military power? The problem of the use of force in Brazilian international relations in the 21st century. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 53(2), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitencourt, L., & Vaz, A. C. (2009). Brazilian strategic culture. Miami: Florida International University, Applied Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correio Braziliense. (2003). Accessed July 9, 2013, from http://www.correiobraziliense.com.br.

  • Bruneau, T. (1997). Portugal’s defense structures and NATO. In T.-D. Young (Ed.), Command in NATO after the cold war: Alliance, national, and multinational considerations (pp. 171–188). Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, T. (2013). Civilians and the military in Latin America: The absence of incentives. Latin American Politics and Society, 55(4), 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, T., & Macleod, A. (1986). Politics in contemporary Portugal: Parties and the consolidation of democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, T., & Tollefson, S. (2014). Civil–military relations in Brazil: A reassessment. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2(1), 107–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, T., & Trinkunas, H. (2008). Global trends and their impact on civil-military relations. In T. Bruneau & H. Trinkunas (Eds.), Global politics of defense reform (pp. 3–20). New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras, H. (2014). The sociological dimension of external military interventions: The Portuguese military abroad. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 13(2), 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministério da Defesa. (2013). Câmara aprova Política Nacional de Defesa, Estratégia Nacional de Defesa e Livro Branco. Accessed March 13, 2014, from http://www.resdal.org/noticias/RESDAL-noticias-del-06-al-13-09-13.html.

  • Duarte, A. P. (2014). A Estratégia Nacional de Defesa do Brasil e O Conceito Estratégico de Defesa Nacional de Portugal: Comparação de Duas Estratégias Nacionais de Segurança e Defesa. Nação e Defesa, 138, 63–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estado-Maior General das Forças Armadas. (2016). Website of the general staff of the armed forces of Portugal. Accessed November, 21, 2016, from http://www.emgfa.pt/pt/operacoes/mapa.

  • Federação das Indústrias do Estado do São Paulo. (2014). Website of the federation of industries of the state of Sao Paulo. Accessed March 13, 2014, from http://www.fiesp.com.br/indices-pesquisas-e-publicacoes/panorama-defesa-comercial/

  • Fishlow, A. (2011). Starting over: Brazil since 1985. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas do Amaral, D. (1983). A Lei de Defesa Nacional e das Forças Armadas. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora Limitada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. (2016). Freedom in the world. Accessed February 12, 2016, from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2016.

  • Hunter, W. (1997). Eroding military influence in Brazil: Politicians against soldiers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jane’s Defence Budgets. (2012) Website of HIS Jane’s defence. Accessed May 27, 2013, from www.janes.com/defence

  • Jane’s Defence Budgets. (2014). Website of HIS Jane’s defense. Accessed February 24, 2015, from www.janes.com/defence

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerche, F. (2007). Autonomia e discricionariedade do Ministério Público no Brasil. Dados, 50(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M. I. (1997). Social theory and comparative politics. In M. I. Lichbach & A. S. Zuckerman (Eds.), Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure (pp. 239–276). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Author. (1989, December). Brazilian navy heading nuclear reactor project. Defense and Foreign Affairs Weekly.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Author. (2013). Conceito Estratégico de Defesa Nacional 2013: Contributos e Debate Pública. Lisbon: Imprensa Nacional—Casa da Moeda & Instituto da Defesa Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pion-Berlin, D. (2005). Political management of the military in Latin America. Military Review, 85(1), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, T. J. (2010). Brazilian democracy as a late bloomer: Reevaluating the regime in the Cardoso-Lula Era [Special issue]. Latin American Research Review, 218–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proença, D. J. (2011). Forças Armadas para Quê? Para Isso. Contexto Internacional, 33(2), 333–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo de Souza, M. (2016, March 21). Marcelo ‘atento, sereno e interventivo’ pede mais investimento para Forças Armadas. Expresso. Accessed March 30, 2016, from http://expresso.sapo.pt/sociedade/2016-03-21-Marcelo-atento-sereno-e-interventivo-pede-mais-investimento-para.

  • Reis, B. C. (2013). Portugal. In H. Biehl, B. Giegerich, & A. Jonas (Eds.), Strategic cultures in Europe: Security and defence policies across the continent (pp. 281–291). Potsdam: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. (2016). Still focused on the Atlantic: Accounting for the limited Europeanization of Portuguese security policy. European Security, 25(1), 134–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadek, M. T., & Batista Cavalcanti, R. (2003). The new Brazilian public prosecution: An agent of accountability. In S. Mainwaring & C. Welna (Eds.), Democratic accountability in Latin America (pp. 201–227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Severiano Teixeira, N. (2009). Contribuição para uma Política de Defesa: julho de 2006 a julho de 2009. Lisbon: Ministério de Defesa Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severiano Teixeira, N., & Santos Pinto, A. (2014). European defence in time of austerity: The case of southern Europe. RSCAS Policy Paper, European University Institute; Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Global Governance Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIPRI. (2015). Accessed February 24, 2015, from http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/milex_database.

  • Skora Rosty, É. (2011). The new structure of Brazilian ministry of defense: Challenges and opportunities. Research paper, Carlisle Barracks, U.S. Army War College Strategy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, A. (1988). Rethinking military politics: Brazil and the southern Cone. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, H. (2005). The lost meaning of strategy. Survival, 47(3), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas C. Bruneau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bruneau, T.C. (2017). Civil-Military Relations in Two “Third Wave” Democracies: The First and a Follower. In: Croissant, A., Kuehn, D. (eds) Reforming Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53189-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics