Abstract
Work in the field of health has been distorted over the years, with the emergence of new health systems that have made the delivery of services a real business. As a result, the field has lost not only the motivation with which it originated, but also the human quality of providing health care. It is not new to say that exercise of the medical profession is in crisis. The causes of this predicament can be found in policies and health systems that are poorly imitated, poorly administered, mismanaged, and poorly regulated. However, there is no denying the crisis is also due to the loss of the Hippocratic spirit that gave force and vitality to the medical profession from its beginning.
Several aspects of work in health and health care, namely, scientific and technical competence (knowledge and knowhow) and human skills (knowing “how to be”), are examined in this chapter, based on a brief look at the patients and the professionals who serve them. The author goes on to discuss three fields of professional activity where these competencies play out: the Hippocratic tradition, social responsibility, and constructive dialogue. In conclusion, and in light of the above, several initiatives and strategies to humanize health services are suggested. They involve example, communication, accompaniment, correction, purpose, and professionalism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Pastor-García LM. Scientific evidence and bioethical discourse. Cuad. Bioét. 2009;XX(3):453–69.
Muñoz-Pérez B, Sarricolea-Errausquin ML. Dr. Lejeune: the educational challenge of bioethics 50 years later. Cuad. Bioét. 2009;XX(3):531–2.
López-Moratalla N. The zygote of our species is the human body. pers.bioét. 2010;14(2):120–40.
Steinbock B. Life before birth. The moral and legal status of embryos and fetuses. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
Barnett R. Learning for an unknown future. High Educ Res Dev. 2012;31(1):65–77.
Patiño-Restrepo JF. The health care in a model of commercial insurance. Rev Colomb Cir. 2011;26(1):9–10.
Gómez-Fajardo CA. Notes on some ideas of the Constitutional Court. Iatreia. 2006;19(2):155–63.
Hottois G. Definir la bioéthique: retour aux sources. Rev Colomb Bio t. 2011;6(2):86–109.
Tomás y Garrido GM. (Coord.). Understanding conscientious objection. Murcia: San Antonio University Foundation; 2011.
Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, Van der Horst H, Jadad A, et al. Should health how we define it? BMJ. 2011;343:D4163.
Sánchez-Naranjo JC. Humanization of health care, art and humor therapy. Rev Med Risaralda. 2013;19(2):154–7.
Gamboa-Bernal G. Philosophical anthropology as key of Bioethics. Rev Roman Bioethics. 2013;11(3):130–7.
Alfaro RM. A communication for another development. Lima: Calandria; 1993.
McLuhan E. McLuhan, then and now. Infoamérica. 2012;7-8:23–9.
González-Blasco P, Pinheiro TR, Rodríguez-Ulloa MF, Angulo-Calderón N. Medical ethics: an educational resource that facilitates learning. pers.bioét. 2009;13(2):114–27.
Wynia MK, Latham Jr SR, Kao AC. Medical professionalism in society. N Engl J Med. 1999;18:1611–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gamboa-Bernal, G.A. (2017). A Brief Bioethical Perspective on Work in the Field of Health. In: Gargiulo, P., Mesones-Arroyo, H. (eds) Psychiatry and Neuroscience Update - Vol. II. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53126-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53126-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53125-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53126-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)