Advertisement

Shame! A System Psychodynamic Perspective

  • Michelle MayEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to contribute to existing knowledge about shame, through using the systems psychodynamic perspective. Firstly I explore the definition of shame, by building on ideas that illustrate the unconscious dynamics of shame in the context of culture. Then follows an overview of systems psychodynamics, which has its theoretical underpinnings in psycho-analytic thinking based on the work of Freud, Klein’s object relations theory, Bion’s work on groups, Jaques’s and Menzies Lyth’s work on organisations as social defences and envious attacks, and open systems theory. A case study is presented to illustrate how systems psychodynamics can contribute to our understanding of shame dynamics operating at the intersection of culture and race (In this chapter race is used in accordance with the South African construction of groups based on their skin colour using apartheid and post-apartheid values.), and how this enhanced understanding can impact the work of practitioners.

Keywords

Shame dynamics Object relations System Social systems as defence Envious attack Context of culture Positive psychology 

References

  1. Abdi, A. A. (2002). Culture education and development in South Africa: Historical and contemporary perspectives. London: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  2. Alford, C. F. (2002). Is murder impossible? Levinas, Winnicott, and the ruthless use of the object. Journal of Psycho-social Studies, 1(1). http://www.btinternet.com/~psycho_social/Vol1/JPSS1-CFA1.html. Accessed November 20, 2004.
  3. Amado, G. (1995). Why psychoanalytical knowledge helps us understand organizations: A discussion with Elliott Jaques. Human Relations, 48(4), 351–357. doi: 10.1177/001872679504800402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, D. (2006). Psychoanalysis and work with institutions. In R. French (Ed.), Organisation in the mind: Psychoanalysis, group relations and organisational consultancy (pp. 29–43). London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bion, W. R. (1975). Selections from “experiences in groups”. In A. D. Colman & W. H. Bexton (Eds.), Group relations reader 1 (pp. 11–20). Washington DC: A.K. Rice Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Bion, W. R. (1985). Container and contained. In A. D. Colman & M. H. Geller (Eds.), Group relations reader 2 (pp. 127–134). Washington DC: A.K. Rice Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Biran, H. (2003). ‘Attacks on linking’ and ‘alpha function’ as two opposite elements in the dynamics of organisations. In R. M. Lipgar & M. Pines (Eds.), Contemporary developments and applications of Bion’s contributions to theory and practice (pp. 164–181). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, A. P. (2003). From individual to social defences in psychosocial criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 7(4), 421–437.Google Scholar
  10. Christians, C. G. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 139–164). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Cilliers, F., & May, M. S. (2002). South African diversity dynamics. Reporting on the 2000 Robben Island diversity experience. A group relations event. South African Journal of Labour Relations, 26(3), 42–68.Google Scholar
  12. Cilliers, F., & May, M. S. (2010). The popularisation of positive psychology as a defence against behavioural complexity in research and organisations. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 10 pp. doi: 10.4102/sajip.v36i2.917 (Art. #917)
  13. Cummins, A. (2000). When the going gets tough (the weak get weaker): Primitive mental states and emotional traumas in students’ attempts to (not) learn. Paper presented at the Annual Symposium of ISPSO, London. http://www.ispso.org/Symposia/London/2000cummins.htm. Accessed December 13, 2004.
  14. Czander, W. M. (1993). The psychodynamics of work and organisations: Theory and application. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Czander, W., & Eisold, K. (2003). Psychoanalytic perspectives on organisational consulting: Transference and countertransference. Human Relations, 56(4), 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elison, J. (2005). Definitions of, and distinctions between, shame and guilt: A facet theory analysis. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(03), 1537 (UMI No. 3085863).Google Scholar
  17. Endacott, R. (2005). Clinical research 4: Qualitative data collection and analysis. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, 21(2), 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Etezady, M. H. (2010). Psychoanalysis in a ‘shame culture’: Japanese psychoanalytic insights. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 91, 1242–1245.  doi:10.1111/j.1745-8315.2010.00316.x.
  19. Fraher, A. L. (2004). Systems psychodynamics: The formative years (1895-1967). Organisational & Social Dynamics, 4(2), 191–211.Google Scholar
  20. Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego: Complete works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fullagar, S. (2003). Wasted lives the social dynamics of shame and youth suicide. Journal of Sociology, 39(3), 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaques, E. (1990). On the dynamics of social structure: A contribution to the psychoanalytical study of social phenomena deriving from the views of Melanie Klein. In E. Trist & H. Murray (Eds.), The social engagement of social science (pp. 420–438). Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kane, M. (2012). Knowing and not-knowing one’s place, organisational ranking and the operation of envy and shame in organisational life. Organisational and Social Dynamics, 2, 194–209.Google Scholar
  24. Klein, M. (1975). Envy and gratitude and other works 1946–1963. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.Google Scholar
  25. Klein, M. (1985). Our adult world and its roots in infancy. In A. D. Colman & M. H. Geller (Eds.), Group relations reader 2 (pp. 5–19). Washington DC: A.K. Rice Institute.Google Scholar
  26. Lansky, M. R. (1999). Shame and the idea of a central affect. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 19(3), 347–361. doi: 10.1080/07351699909534255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lansky, M. R. (2003). The “incompatible idea” revisited: The oft-invisible ego-ideal and shame dynamics. American Journal of Psycho-analysis, 63(4), 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lansky, M. R. (2005). Hidden shame. Journal of American Psycho-analytic Association, 53(3), 865–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Likierman, M. (2001). Melanie Klein: Her work in context. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  30. Long, S. (2004). Building an institution for experiential learning. In L. J. Gould, L. F. Stapley & M. Stein (Eds.), Experiential learning in organisations: Applications of the Tavistock group relations approach (pp. 101–136). London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  31. May, M. S. (2010). The unconscious at work: The (k)not of relationship between students, lecturers and management in a historically black university. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Pretoria: University of South Africa.Google Scholar
  32. May, M. S. (2012). Diversity dynamics operating between students, lecturers and management in a historically black university: The lecturers’ perspective. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 38(2), 8 pp. doi: 10.4102/sajip.v38i2.1003 (Art. #1003)
  33. May, M. S., & Cilliers, F. (2002). The Robben Island diversity experience 2001: Diversity dynamics a year later. Paper presented at the 8th National Congress of the Psychological Society of Southern Africa, University of Western Cape, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  34. Menzies Lyth, I. (1960). Social Systems as a defense against anxiety: An empirical study of the nursing service of a general hospital. Human Relations, 13, 95–121.Google Scholar
  35. Menzies Lyth, I. (1981). Bion’s contribution to thinking about groups. In J. S. Grotstein (Ed.), Do I dare to disturb the universe a memorial to W.R. Bion (pp. 662–666). London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  36. Menzies Lyth, I. (1990). A psychoanalytical perspective on social institutions. In E. Trist & H. Murray (Eds.), The social engagement of social science (pp. 463–475). Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mnguni, P. P. (2012). Deploying culture as a defence against incompetence: The unconscious dynamics of public service work. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 38(2), 9 pp. doi: 10.4102/sajip.v38i2.1000 (Art. #1000)
  38. Mollon, P. (2002). Shame and jealousy: The hidden turmoils. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  39. Morrison, A. P. (2011). The psychodynamics of shame. In R. L. Dearing & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Shame in the therapy hour (pp. 23–43). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/12326-002
  40. Mouly, V. S., & Sankaram, J. K. (2002). The enactment of envy within organisations: Insights from a New Zealand academic department. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science38(10), 36–56.Google Scholar
  41. Ogden, T. H. (1983). The concept of internal object relations. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 227–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Powell Pruitt, L., & Barber, M. (2004). Savage inequalities indeed: Irrationality and urban school reform. In S. Cytrynbaum & D. A. Noumair (Eds.), Group dynamics, organisational irrationality and social complexity: Group relations reader 3 (pp. 303–320). Washington DC: A.K. Rice Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Rizzuto, A. M. (2014). Shame in psychoanalysis: The function of unconscious fantasies. In C. Pajaczkowska & I. Ward (Eds.), Shame and sexuality: Psychoanalysis and visual culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Robbins, B. D., & Goicoechea, J. (2005). The psychogenesis of the self and the emergence of ethical relatedness: Klein in light of Merleau-Ponty. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 25(2), 11–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shapiro, E. R., & Carr, A. W. (1991). Lost in familiar places: Creating new connections between the individual and society. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Shweder, R. A. (2003). Toward a deep cultural psychology of shame. Social Research, 70(4), 1100–1129.Google Scholar
  47. Siopis, P. (2005). Painting of shame. London: Freud Museum. https://www.freud.org.uk/exhibitions/10524/three-essays-on-shame. Accessed March 01, 2016.
  48. Stadter, M. (2011). The inner world of shaming and ashamed: An object relations perspective and therapeutic approach. In R. L. Dearing & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Shame in the therapy hour (pp. 45–68). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/12326-002
  49. Stein, M. (2000). After Eden: Envy and the defences against anxiety paradigm. Human Relations, 53(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tangney, J. P. (2001). Constructive and destructive aspects of shame and guilt. In A. C. Bohart & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive and destructive behaviour: Implications for family, school and society (pp. 127–145). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, T. F. (2015).  The influence of shame on posttrauma disorders: Have we failed to see the obvious? European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 6, 28847. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v6.28847.
  52. Ward, T. (1993). An object relations analysis of learning and emotional containment in school systems. In T. W. Hugg, N. M. Carson & R. M. Lipgar (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth scientific meeting of the A.K. Rice institute (pp. 193–197). Jupiter, FL: The A.K. Rice Institute.Google Scholar
  53. Wells, L. (1985). The group-as-a-whole perspective and its theoretical roots. In A. D. Colman & M. H. Geller (Eds.), Group relations reader 2 (pp. 109–126). Washington DC: A.K. Rice Institute.Google Scholar
  54. Windland, L. C. (2003). Learning as a lived and living process-reflexivity in research in the light of Bion and Bergson. Journal for Psycho-Social Studies, 2(1). http://www.btinternet.com/~psycho_social/Vol2/JPSS2-LCW1.html. Accessed December 20, 2004.
  55. Young, R. (1995). Psychotic anxieties in groups and organisations. In D. Armstrong, W. G. Lawrence & R. M. Young (Eds.), Group relations: An introduction. Retrieved April 5, 2006, from http://human-nature.com/rmyoung/papers/paper99.html.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Organisational PsychologyUniversity of South Africa (UNISA)PretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations