Case Comparison: CCTs’ Divorce from Education Policy and Long Program Lives

  • Michelle Morais de Sá e Silva


Chapter 7 contrasts case-specific findings, pointing out what they reveal in terms of conditional cash transfers (CCTs ) linkage (or absence of) to educational policies and practices. Some suggested inputs to existing theories are provided, along with the presentation of some lessons learned. The findings are meant to inspire the large array of stakeholders that have somehow got involved in the CCT debate and expansion throughout the world. It speaks especially to those who have high hopes of CCTs having deeper impacts on the educational indicators of developing countries and points out the challenges that need to be surmounted if those hopes are to become true. Lastly, the chapter is also dedicated to looking at CCT’s long program lives. It argues that when funding is not an issue, most of these programs have been able to survive for long periods of time. Bolsa Familia has existed since 2004 in Brazil and the same long life story applies to the multiplicity of CCTs in Latin America, such as in Chile, Ecuador, Uruguay, and even the national Colombian CCT.


  1. Bastagli, F. (2008). The design, implementation and impact of conditional cash transfers targeted on the poor: An evaluation of Brazil’s Bolsa Familia. Unpublished manuscript. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  2. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bosman, J. (2010, March 30). City will stop paying the poor for good behavior. The New York Times. Retrieved March 31, 2010, from
  4. De Janvry, A., Finan, F., & Sadoulet, E. (2008). Local electoral accountability and decentralized performance. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  5. Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glewwe, P., & Kassouf, A. (2008). The impact of the Bolsa Escola/Bolsa Familia conditional cash transfer program on enrollment, drop out rates and grade promotion in Brazil. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  7. Levy, S. (2006). Progress against poverty: Sustaining Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades program. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  8. Lindert, K., Linder, A., Hobbs, J., & de la Briere, B. (2007). The nuts and bolts of Brazil’s BolsaFamília program: Implementing conditional cash transfers in a descentralized context. World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper, 709. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  9. MDS. (2008). Programa Bolsa Familia. Retrieved November 2, 2008, from
  10. Oliveira, A. (2009). An evaluation of the Bolsa Familia program in Brazil: Expenditures, education and labor outcomes. Retrieved from
  11. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004). The politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. True, J., Jones, B., & Baumgartner, F. (2007). Punctuated-equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in American policymaking. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  13. UIS. (2016). Brazil Custom Tables. Retrieved December 3, 2016, from
  14. Viana, I., Sousa, J., & Oliveira, A. (2009). Schooling transitions to evaluate the impact of the Bolsa Familia program in Brazil: Breaking the intergenerational cycle of poverty. Retrieved from
  15. Zittoun, P. (2014). The political process of policymaking: A pragmatic approach to public policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle Morais de Sá e Silva
    • 1
  1. 1.Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP)BrasíliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations