Skip to main content

Analysis of 2-Opt Heuristic for the Winner Determination Problem Under the Chamberlin-Courant System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Discrete Applied Mathematics (CALDAM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10156))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 790 Accesses

Abstract

Winner determination problem under Chamberlin-Courant system deals with the problem of selecting a fixed-size assembly from a set of candidates that minimizes the sum of misrepresentation values. This system does not restrict the candidates to have a minimum number of votes to be selected. The problem is known to be NP-hard. In this paper, we consider domination analysis of a 2-Opt heuristic for this problem. We show that the 2-Opt heuristic produces solutions no worse than the average solution in polynomial time. We also show that the domination number of the 2-Opt heuristic is at least \({m-1 \atopwithdelims ()k-1}k^{n-1}\) for n voters and m candidates.

E. Iranmanesh and R. Krishnamurti—Supported by NSERC Discovery Grant, Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brams, S.J.: Mathematics and Democracy - Designing Better Voting and Fair-division Procedures. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brams, S.J., Fishburn, P.C.: Proportional representation in variable-size legislatures. Soc. Choice Welf. 1, 211–229 (1984)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brams, S.J., Fishburn, P.C.: Some logical defects of the single transferable vote. In: Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Monroe, B.L.: Fully proportional representation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 89(4), 925–940 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chamberlin, J.R., Courant, P.N.: Representative deliberations and representative decisions: proportional representation and the Borda rule. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 77(3), 718–733 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Procaccia, A.D.: Computational voting theory: of the agents, by the agents, for the agents. Ph.D. thesis, Hebrew University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Betzler, N., Slinko, A., Uhlmann, J.: On the computation of fully proportional representation. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 47, 475–519 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Skowron, P., Yu, L., Faliszewski, P., Elkind, E.: The complexity of fully proportional representation for single-crossing electorates. In: Vöcking, B. (ed.) SAGT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8146, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41392-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu, L., Chan, H., Elkind, E.: Multiwinner elections under preferences that are single-peaked on a tree. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clearwater, A., Puppe, C., Slinko, A.: The single-crossing property on a tree. CoRR abs/1410.2272 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Skowron, P., Faliszewski, P., Slinko, A.: Fully proportional representation as resource allocation: approximability results. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Skowron, P., Faliszewski, P., Slinko, A.: Achieving fully proportional representation is easy in practice. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vazirani, V.V.: Approximation Algorithms. Springer, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Alon, N., Gutin, G., Krivelevich, M.: Algorithms with large domination ratio. J. Algorithms 50(1), 118–131 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Glover, F., Punnen, A.P.: The travelling salesman problem: new solvable cases and linkages with the development of approximation algorithms. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 48(5), 502–510 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zemel, E.: Measuring the quality of approximate solutions to zero-one program- ming problems. Math. Oper. Res. 6(3), 319–332 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Punnen, A.P., Sripratak, P., Karapetyan, D.: Average value of solutions for the bipartite Boolean quadratic programs and rounding algorithms. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 565(C), 77–89 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Punnen, A.P., Kabadi, S.: Domination analysis of some heuristics for the traveling salesman problem. Discret. Appl. Math. 119(1–2), 117–128 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Angel, E., Zissimopoulos, V.: On the quality of local search for the quadratic assignment problem. Discret. Appl. Math. 82(1–3), 15–25 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Brams, S., Potthoff, R.F.: Proportional representation: broadening the options. Working papers, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baranyai, Z.: On the factorization of the complete uniform hypergraph. In: Infinite and Finite Sets: Proceedings of a Colloquium, Keszthely, June 25–July 1 1973, vol. 1, pp. 91–108 (1975). Dedicated to Paul Erdos on his 60th Birthday

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Abraham Punnen, Binay Bhattacharya, Kamyar Khodamoradi, and Vladyslav Sokol, for helpful discussions on this problem. The authors acknowledge support from a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehsan Iranmanesh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ćustić, A., Iranmanesh, E., Krishnamurti, R. (2017). Analysis of 2-Opt Heuristic for the Winner Determination Problem Under the Chamberlin-Courant System. In: Gaur, D., Narayanaswamy, N. (eds) Algorithms and Discrete Applied Mathematics. CALDAM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10156. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53007-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53007-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53006-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53007-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics