Skip to main content

Why Girls? Why Now?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Reading Lena Dunham’s Girls
  • 1224 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces readers to a range of scholarship and outlines the key reasons why the HBO TV series Girls has caused such controversy over its first five seasons, and why it is the show many feminists love to hate. The feminist content of this and other media productions, its relationship to a ‘postfeminist sensibility’, and the celebrity feminism of Lena Dunham are brought to the fore. This chapter reviews key critical scholarship in the area and highlights important new areas of investigation. With a helpful introduction to the work of each contributor, it responds to Girls as a millennial text with an important gendered message, whilst anticipating and foregrounding important criticisms of its blind spots, and the perils of putting feminism into popular culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beale, C. (2016, January 29). Lena Dunham branded hypocrite for criticising Hollywood’s lack of diversity when Girls has all-white leads. Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/lena-dunham-branded-hypocrite-for-criticising-hollywoods-lack-of-diversity-a6839136.html.

  • Bell, K. (2013). Obvie, we’re the ladies! Postfeminism, privilege, and HBO’s newest Girls. Feminist Media Studies, 13(2), 363–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2013). For white girls only? Postfeminism and the politics of inclusion. Feminist Formations, 25(1), 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. (2016). The ‘smart’ body politics of Lena Dunham’s Girls. Feminist Media Studies, 16(6), 1029–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S., & Driscoll, C. (2015). HBO’s Girls: Gender, generation, and quality television. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 29(2), 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard, J. (2005). Sex and the City: Carrie Bradshaw’s queer postfeminism. Feminist Media Studies, 5(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grdešić, M. (2013). I’m not the ladies! Metatextual commentary in Girls. Feminist Media Studies, 13(2), 355–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrey, A. (2013, March 26). Do millennials stand a chance in the real world? New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/magazine/do-millennials-stand-a-chance-in-the-real-world.html?_r=0.

  • Lyons, K. (2016, March 7). Generation Y: A guide to a much-maligned demographic. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/07/millennials-generation-y-guide-to-much-maligned-demographic.

  • McDowell, L. (2012). Post-crisis, post-Ford and post-gender? Youth identities in an era of austerity. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(5), 573–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, L. (2002). Victims no more: Postfeminism, television, and Ally McBeal. The Communication Review, 5(4), 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, K. (2007). Divas, evil black bitches, and bitter black women: African American women in postfeminist and post-civil-rights popular culture. In Y. Tasker & D. Negra (Eds.), Interrogating postfeminism: Gender and the politics of popular culture (pp. 249–277). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, E. (2015). Lena Dunham: The awkward/ambiguous politics of white millennial feminism. In E. Watson, J. Mitchell, & M.E. Shaw (Eds.), HBO’s Girls and the awkward politics of gender, race, and privilege (pp. 145–166). Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, E., Mitchell, J., & Shaw, M.E. (2015). Introduction: Reading into Girls, writing what we read. In E. Watson, J. Mitchell, & M.E. Shaw (Eds.), HBO’s Girls and the awkward politics of gender, race, and privilege (pp. 1–8). Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, F. (2015). Girls talk: Authorship and authenticity in the reception of Lena Dunham’s Girls. Critical Studies in Television, 10(2), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meredith Nash .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nash, M., Whelehan, I. (2017). Why Girls? Why Now?. In: Nash, M., Whelehan, I. (eds) Reading Lena Dunham’s Girls. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52971-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics