Endovaginal Imaging: Slings

Chapter

Abstract

Multicompartment ultrasound imaging of the pelvis, including 3D endovaginal imaging and 2D dynamic assessment, is evolving into a useful tool in the assessment of post-implant behavior, including diagnosis and management of patients with complications related to synthetic tapes. It can help to understand the in vivo functional behavior of slings following surgery and to clarify the etiology of failure, including the reason for voiding dysfunction.

Keywords

Sling Mesh complication Urinary incontinence Voiding dysfunction 

References

  1. 1.
    Ulmsten U, Hendriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anaesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):81–85 discussion 85–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol. 2001;11(5):1306–13. [Article in French].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schuettoff S, Beyersdorff D, Gauruder-Burmester A, Tunn R. Visibility of the polypropylene tape after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure in women with stress urinary incontinence: comparison of introital ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in vitro and in patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27(6):687–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaum HJ, Wolff F. TVT: on midurethral tape positioning and its influence on continence. Int Urogynecol J. 2002;13(2):110–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halaska M, Otcenasek M, Martan A, Masata J, Voight R, Seifert M. Pelvic anatomy changes after TVT procedure assessed by MRI. Int Urogynecol J. 1999;10(S1):S87–8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dietz HP. Imaging of implant materials. In: Dietz HP, Hoyte LPJ, Steensma AB, editors. Atlas of pelvic floor ultrasound. London: Springer; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Stankiewicz A, Wozniak MM, Bogusiewicz M, Rechberger T. High resolution 3D endovaginal ultrasonography in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy: a preliminary study. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20(10):1213–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar V, Davila GW. Dynamic assessment of sling function on transperineal ultrasound: Is it correlated with outcomes one year following surgery? (abstract) Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(Suppl 3):S69–70.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Perucchini D, Eberhard J, Geissbühler V, Hilgers R, Viereck V. Tape functionality: sonographic tape characteristics and outcome after TVT incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(6):485–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang JM, Yang SH, Huang WC. Dynamic interaction involved in the tension-free vaginal tape obturator procedure. J Urol. 2008;180(5):2081–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang JM, Yang SH, Huang WC. Correlation of morphological alterations and functional impairment of the tension-free vaginal tape obturator procedure. J Urol. 2009;181(1):211–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lo TS, Wang AC, Horng SG, Liang CC, Soong YK. Ultrasonographic and urodynamic evaluation after tension free vaginal tape procedure (TVT). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(1):65–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar V, Davila G. Dynamic assessment of sling function on 2D transperineal ultrasound: is it correlated with outcomes one year following retropublic midurethral sling surgery? (abstract). Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(Suppl 1):S40.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jijon A, Hegde A, Arias B, Aguilar V, Davila GW. An inelastic retropubic suburethral sling in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(8):1325–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar V, Davila GW. Comparison of the in vivo deformability of three different sling types on dynamic assessment of sling function. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(Suppl):S78.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hegde A, Noguieras GM, Aguilar V, Davila G. Dynamic assessment of sling function on transperineal ultrasound in patients with successful outcomes following retropubic sling surgery for ISD: comparison of a non-deformable pubovaginal sling with deformable midurethral sling. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(Suppl):S89–90.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dietz HP, Foote AJ, Mak HL, Wilson PD. TVT and Sparc suburethral slings: a case-control series. Int Urogynecol J. 2004;15(2):129–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ng CC, Lee LC, Han WH. Use of 3D ultrasound scan to assess the clinical importance of midurethral placement of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for treatment of incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16(3):220–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dietz HP, Mouritsen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD. How important is TVT location? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(10):904–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar V, Davila GW. Correlation of static and dynamic location of the transobturator sling with outcomes as described by 3 dimensional endovaginal ultrasound? (abstract). Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(Suppl 3):S30.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bogusiewicz M, Stankiewicz A, Monist M, Wozniak M, Wiezoreck A, Rechberger T. Most of the patients with suburethral sling failure have tapes located outside the high-pressure zone of the urethra (abstract). Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(Suppl 2):S68–9.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lo TS, Horng SG, Liang CC, Lee SJ, Soong YK. Ultrasound assessment of mid-urethra tape at three-year follow-up after tension-free-vaginal tape procedure. Urology. 2004;63(4):671–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dietz HP, Mouritsen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD. Does the tension-free vaginal tape stay where you put it? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(4):950–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Kuszka A, Eberhard J, Hilger R, Viereck V. Can we place tension-free vaginal tape where it should be? The one-third rule. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(2):210–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rechberger T, Futyma K, Jankiewicz K, Adamiak A, Bogusiewicz M, Bartuzi A, Miotla P, Skorupski P, Tomaszewski J. Tape fixation: an important surgical step to improve success rate of anti-incontinence surgery. J Urol. 2011;186(1):180–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar V, Davila GW. Should a suburethral sling be suture-fixated in place at the time of implantation? (abstract). Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(Suppl 3):S60.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar V, Davila GW. Transobturator sling surgery with concomitant anterior vaginal wall repair performed through the same incision: Is there an impact on the location of the sling one year following sling surgery? (abstract). Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(Suppl 4):S51.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chantarasorn V, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Sonographic appearance of transobturator slings: implications for function and dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:493–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang JM, Yang SH, Huang WC, Tzeng CR. Correlation of tape location and tension with surgical outcome after transobturator suburethral tape procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(4):458–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hegde A, Aguilar V, Davila GW. Is sling location at rest correlated with denovo and persistent overactive bladder symptoms following transobturator and retropubic midurethral sling surgery? (abstract). Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(Suppl 4):S23–4.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar V, Davila GW. Is there concordance in the location of the transobturator sling as determined by transperineal and endovaginal 3 dimensional ultrasound?: correlation with outcomes (abstract). Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(Suppl 3):S52.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Javadian P, Quiroz L, Nihira MA, Shobeiri SA. Transobturator slings demonstrate a wide variation in their anatomic paths: A 3D ultrasound study. In: Oral Poster 36. American Urogynecologic Society Annual Meeting. 2016. 27 Sep – 1 Oct 2016, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aparna Hegde
    • 1
  • S. Abbas Shobeiri
    • 2
    • 3
  • G. Willy Davila
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Health (C.U.P)New DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyGynecologic Subspecialties, INOVA Women’s Hospital, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityFalls ChurchUSA
  3. 3.Department of BioengineeringGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  4. 4.Section of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Gynecology FloridaThe Cleveland ClinicWestonUSA

Personalised recommendations