Abstract
Recent developments in molecular biology and the neurosciences on body–environment interaction and interdependence have led the natural sciences to prominently challenge the social sciences to refurbish some of the central elements of their theoretical apparatus and enter into joined empirical research. In the neurosciences, and departing from older perspectives, perception, cognition and knowledge are increasingly seen as integral elements of action, dynamically situating/embedding ‘cognitive agents’ in their socio-cultural-natural environments. Likewise, recent research in epigenetics suggests that bodily practices, shaped by their social and material environments within which they are performed, imprint a body that becomes highly susceptible to both past ‘experiences’ of and to present changes in its social and material environment. In this chapter, we critically review the research (practices) that prompted this challenge and discuss how it affects, but does not consider, social theories of interaction, habituation and inheritance. In a second step, we develop a social and practice theory on the basis of a co-laborative research agenda of ‘embodied practice’ that stresses the somatic context, performativity, historicity and dynamic situativity of embedded bodies. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and methodological implications of such an endeavour.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barad, K. M. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. M. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bateson, G. (1941). Experiments in thinking about observed ethnological material. Philosophy of Science, 8(1), 53–68.
Bateson, G. (1971). Communication. In N. McQuown (Ed.), The natural history of an interview (pp. 2–40). Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Library.
Beck, S. (2013). Embodiment and emplacement of cognition—Praxistheoretische Perspektiven. In T. Breyer, G. Etzelmüller, T. Fuchs, & G. Schwarzkopf (Eds.), Interdisziplinäre Anthropologie. Leib – Geist – Körper. (Schriften des Marsilius Kollegs, Bd. 10) (pp. 195–231). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
Benton, T. (1991). Biology and social science: Why the return of the repressed should be given a (cautious) welcome. Sociology, 25(1), 1–29.
Bourdieu, P. (1979). Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis auf der Ethnologischen Grundlage der kabylischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33.
Choudhury, S., & Slaby, J. (2012). Introduction. Critical neuroscience—Between lifeworld and laboratory. In S. Choudhury & J. Slaby (Eds.), Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience (pp. 1–26). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cowan, J. K. (1990). Dance and the body politic in Northern Greece. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Csordas, T. J. (1990). Embodiment as a paradigm for anthropology. Ethos, 18(1), 5–47.
Desjarlais, R., & Throop, C. J. (2011). Phenomenological approaches in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40(1), 87–102.
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Downey, G. (2012). Balancing between cultures: Equilibrium in Capoeira. In D. H. Lende & G. Downey (Eds.), The encultured brain. An introduction to neuroanthropology (pp. 169–194). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Durham, W. H. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Evens, T. M. S. (2006). Some ontological implications of situational analysis. In T. M. S. Evens & D. Handelman (Eds.), The manchester school: Practice and ethnographic praxis in anthropology (pp. 49–63). New York: Routledge.
Faßler, M. (2014). Das Soziale. Entstehung und Zukunft menschlicher Selbstorganisation. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Fitzgerald, D., & Callard, F. (2014). Social science and neuroscience beyond interdisciplinarity: Experimental entanglements. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(1), 3–32.
Gallotti, M., & Frith, C. D. (2013). Social cognition in the We-mode. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 160–165.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures. Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.
Henrich, J. (2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(6), 795–855.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The Weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2/3), 1–22.
Hirschauer, S. (2008). Die Empiriegeladenheit von Theorien und der Erfindungsreichtum der Praxis. In H. Kalthoff, S. Hirschauer, & G. Lindemann (Eds.), Theoretische Empirie: zur Relevanz qualitativer Forschung (pp. 165–187). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hirschauer, S. (2010). pers. comm. as part of the workshop “Soziologische vs. ethnologische Ethnographie,” Thomas Scheffer and Christian Meyer, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of European Ethnology funded by the Thyssen foundation.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutchins, E. (2008). The role of cultural practices in the emergence of modern human intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1499), 2011–2019.
Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University Lectures, SUNY Series in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Albany: SUNY Press.
Jay, M. (1988). Scopic regimes of modernity. In H. Foster (Ed.), Vision and visuality (pp. 3–23). Seattle: Seattle Bay Press.
König, R. (1984). Einleitung. In R. König (Ed.), Die Regeln der soziologischen Methode (pp. 21–82). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Kuhlen, A.K., Allefeld, C. H., & John D. (2012). Content-specific coordination of listeners’ to speakers’ EEG during communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(266), 419–433.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Landecker, H. (2011). Food as exposure: Nutritional epigenetics and the new metabolism. Biosocieties, 6(2), 167–194.
Landecker, H., & Panofsky, A. (2013). From social structure to gene regulation, and back: A critical introduction to environmental epigenetics for sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 333–357.
Lave, J. (1985). Introduction: Situationally specific practice. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 16(3), 171–176.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lende, D. H., & Downey, G. (2012). The encultured brain—Toward the future. In D. H. Lende & G. Downey (Eds.), The encultured brain. An introduction to neuroanthropology (pp. 391–419). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Linde, H. (1972). Sachdominanz in Sozialstrukturen. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Lock, M. (1993). Cultivating the body: Anthropology and epistemologies of bodily practice and knowledge. Annual Review of Anthropology, 22, 133–155.
Luckmann, T. (1970). On the boundaries of the social world. In M. A. Nathanson (Ed.), Phenomenology and social reality: Essays in memory of Alfred Schutz (pp. 73–100). The Hague: Nijhoff.
Marcus, G. E. (Ed.). (2000). Para-sites: A casebook against cynical reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Newton, T. (2007). Nature and sociology. London/New York: Routledge.
Niewöhner, J. (2011). Epigenetics: Embedded bodies and the molecularisation of biography and Milieu. BioSocieties, 6(3), 279–298.
Niewöhner, J. (2014). Ökologien der Stadt. Zur Ethnografie Bio- und Geopolitischer Praxis. Zeitschrift für Volkskunde, 110(2), 185–214.
Niewöhner, J. (2015). Epigenetics. Localising biology through Co-laboration. New Genetics & Society, 34(2), 219–242.
Niewöhner, J. (2016). Co-laborative anthropology: Crafting reflexivities experimentally. In J. Jouhki & T. Steel (Eds.), Etnologinen tulkinta ja analyysi. Kohti avoimempaa tutkimusprosessia (pp. 81-124). Helsinki: Ethnos.
Niewöhner, J., Kehl, C., & Beck, S. (2008). Wie geht Kultur unter die Haut – und wie kann man dies beobachtbar machen? In J. Niewöhner, C. Kehl, & S. Beck (Eds.), Wie geht Kultur unter die Haut? Emergente Praxen an der Schnittstelle von Medizin, Lebens- und Sozialwissenschaft (pp. 9–30). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Ortner, S. B. (1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126–166.
Parsons, T. (1991 [1951]). The social system. With a new preface by brian S. Turner. London: Routledge.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice—Time, agency & science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Pickersgill, M., Niewöhner, J., Müller, R., Martin, P., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2013). Mapping the new molecular landscape: Social dimensions of epigenetics. New Genetics and Society, 32(4), 429–447.
Rabinow, P. (1996). Science as a practice: Ethos, logos, pathos. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Essays on the anthropology of reason (pp. 3–27). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rabinow, P., Marcus, G. E., Faubion, J. D., & Rees, T. (Eds.). (2008). Designs for an anthropology of the contemporary. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
Reckwitz, A. (2003). Grundelemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 32(4), 282–301.
Ryle, G. (1968). The thinking of thoughts. Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan.
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. (2010). Material and social life. Nature and Culture, 5(2), 123–149.
Schmidt, R. (2012). Soziologie der Praktiken. Suhrkamp: Konzeptionelle Studien und empirische Analysen. Frankfurt/M.
Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Tomasello, M. (2002). Die kulturelle Entwicklung des menschlichen Denkens. Suhrkamp: Zur Evolution der Kognition. Frankfurt/M.
Tsing, A. (2010). Worlding the Matsutake Diaspora. In T. Otto & N. Bubandt (Eds.), Experiments in holism (pp. 47–66). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Tsing, A. (2000). The global situation. Cultural Anthropology, 15(3), 327–360.
Turner, S. P. (2001). Throwing out the tacit rule book. Learning and practices. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 120–130). London: Routledge.
Turner, S. P. (2006). Praxis and practices. In A. Harrington, B. L. Marshall, & H.-P. Muller (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 463–465). London: Routledge.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Vogeley, K., & Roepstorff, A. (2009). Contextualising culture and social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(12), 511–516.
Wilce, J. M., Jr. (2004). Passionate scholarship: Recent anthropologies of emotion. Reviews in Anthropology, 33(1), 1–17.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636.
Zola, I. K. (1966). Culture and symptoms - An Analysis of Patients’ presenting complaints. American Sociological Review, 31(5), 615–630.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niewöhner, J., Beck, S. (2017). Embodying Practices: The Human Body as Matter (of Concern) in Social Thought. In: Jonas, M., Littig, B., Wroblewski, A. (eds) Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52897-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52897-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52895-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52897-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)