Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 59))

  • 1467 Accesses

Abstract

The paper analyze the method used by us in insertion of implantable ports for chemotherapy (port-a-cat/PAC) and to evaluate intra and postoperative complications. The authors conducted a prospective study in which we included patients operated at the Fifth Surgical Clinic of the Municipal Hospital Cluj-Napoca. Implantable chambers was installed in all cases, by ecoguided puncturing the internal jugular vein. Of the 250 patients included in the study, 97 patients (38.8%) had breast cancer, 26 (10.4%) lung cancer, 25 (10%) colorectal cancer, 22 patients (8.8%) neoplasms in ENT. Patients were aged between 19 and 74 years. 58% of patients were stage IV. The main intraoperative complications were incorrect puncturing / introduction of the catheter. Among postoperative complications were internal jugular vein thrombosis (1.2%), abscesses at the site of implantation (1.6%), extravasation of the port (2%). The method of insertion of implantable chamber through internal jugular vein, used by us, has very good results, the number of intra and postoperative complications is minimal, also avoiding catheter breakage, hemothorax and pneumothorax.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ku YH, Kuo PH, Tsai YF, Huang WT, Lin MH, Tsao CJ. (2009) Port-A-Cath implantation using percutaneous puncture without guidance. Ann Surg Oncol. vol 16, no. 3, pp. 729-734.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vandoni RE, Guerra A, Sanna P, Bogen M, Cavalli F, Gertsch P. (2009) Randomised comparison of complications from three different permanent central venous access systems. Swiss Med., pp. 313-316.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biffi R, de Braud F, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Mauri S, Goldhirsch A, Nolè F, Andreoni B. (1998) Totally implantable central venous access ports for long- term chemotherapy. Ann Oncol., vol.9, no.7, pp. 767-773.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marcy PY, Figl A (2010) Arm port implantation in cancer patients. Int J. of Clinical Oncology. vol.15, no.3, pp. 328-330

    Google Scholar 

  5. Czepizak CA, O’Callaghan JM, Venus B. (1995) Evaluation of formulas for optimal positioning of central venous catheters. Chest, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 1662-1664.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Petersen J, Delaney JH, Brakstad MT, Rowbotham RK, Bagley CM Jr. (1999) Silicone venous access devices positioned with their tips high in the superior vena cava are more likely to malfunction. Am J Surg., vol.178, no. 1, pp. 38-41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walser (2012) Veous access ports: indications, technique, Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 751-764.

    Google Scholar 

  8. LaBella G, (2005) Port-A-Cath placement without the aid of fluoroscopy or localizing devices: a community hospital series. Cancer J., vol. 11, no.2, pp. 157-159.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shen-Gunther J, (2003) Outpatient implantation of a central venous access system in gynecologic oncology patients. J Reprod, vol 48, no.11, pp.875-881.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rykov MY, (2016) Implantable venous ports in pediatric oncology. J Vasc Access., vol.12, no.4, pp 345-347.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wyles SM, Browne G, Gui GP. (2007) Pitfalls in Portacath location using the landmark technique: case report. Int Semin Surg Oncol.4:13

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aparna S, et all. (2015) Complications of chemoport in children with cancer: Experience of 54,100 catheter days from a tertiary cancer center of Southern India. South Asian J Cancer, vol. 4, pp.143-145

    Google Scholar 

  13. Binnebösel M, et all.(2009) Internal jugular vein thrombosis presenting as a painful neck mass due to a spontaneous dislocated subclavian port catheter as long-term complication. Cases J. 2:7991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gonda SJ, Li R. (2011) Principles of subcutaneous port placement. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp.:198-203

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ko SY, et all (2016) Spontaneous fracture and migration of catheter of a totally implantable venous access port via internal jugular vein--a case report. J Cardiothorac Surg., pp. 11-50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Micu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Micu, B., Micu, C., Pop, TR., Constantea, N. (2017). Implantable Ports in Oncology. In: Vlad, S., Roman, N. (eds) International Conference on Advancements of Medicine and Health Care through Technology; 12th - 15th October 2016, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52875-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52875-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52874-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52875-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics