Advertisement

Learner Feature Variation in Measuring the Listenability for Learners of English as a Foreign Language

  • Katsunori KotaniEmail author
  • Takehiko Yoshimi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10108)

Abstract

Previous research on the ease of listening comprehension (henceforth, listenability) has measured listenability on the basis of sentence properties such as the length of words/sentences and speech rate. Recent research has included features of listeners, which are required for the measurement of listenability for English learners because their listening proficiencies vary greatly from the beginner to the advanced level. Given the importance of listening proficiency as a listener feature, this study developed listenability measurement methods based on the costs of compiling listener features: expensive features extracted from test scores and inexpensive features extracted from learners’ experiences. The experimental results showed that inexpensive features made substantial contributions to the measurement of middle-range listenability.

Keywords

Listenability Learner features English as a foreign language 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers, 22300299, 15H02940.

References

  1. 1.
    Chall, J.S., Dial, H.E.: Listener understanding and interest in newscasts. Educ. Res. Bull. 27(6), 141–153+168 (1948)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fang, I.E.: The easy listening formula. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 11(1), 63–68 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Messerklinger, J.: Listenability. Cent. Eng. Lang. Educ. J. 14, 56–70 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kotani, K., Ueda, S., Yoshimi, T., Nanjo, H.: A listenability measuring method for an adaptive computer-assisted language learning and teaching system. In: Proceedings of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation, pp. 387–394 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yoon, S.-Y., Cho, Y., Napolitano, D.: Spoken text difficulty estimation using linguistic features. In: Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, pp. 267–276 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saville-Troike, M.: Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiyokawa, H.: A formula for predicting listenability: the listenability of English language materials 2. Wayo Women’s Univ. Lang. Lit. 24, 57–74 (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ockey, G.: The use of TOEFL to measure a change in English proficiency. Working Papers on Language Acquisition and Education, vol. 10, pp. 1–12 (1999). http://works.bepress.com/gary-ockey/13/
  9. 9.
    Tanaka, K., Ellis, R.: Study-abroad, language proficiency, and learner beliefs about language learning. JALT J. 25(1), 63–85 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brewer, E., Sively, R., Gozik, N., Doyle, D.M., Savicki, V.: Beyond the study abroad industry: perspectives from other disciplines on assessing study abroad learning outcomes. In: Savicki, V., Brewer, E. (eds.) Assessing Study Abroad: Theory, Tools, and Practice. Stylus Publishing, Sterling (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmid, H.: Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In: Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, Manchester, UK, pp. 44–49 (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vapnik, V.: Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rüping, S.: MySVM-Manual. University of Dortmund, Lehrstuhl Informatik VIII (2000). http://www-ai.cs.uni-ortmund.de/SOFTWARE/MYSVM/
  14. 14.
    Seright, L.: Age and aural comprehension achievement in francophone adults learning English. TESOL Q. 19(3), 455–473 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marinova-Todd, S.H., Marshall, D.B., Snow, C.E.: Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Q. 34(1), 9–34 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Warscauer, M.: Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO J. 13(2), 7–26 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kansai Gaidai UniversityOsakaJapan
  2. 2.Ryukoku UniversityShigaJapan

Personalised recommendations