Advertisement

The Design of TurnTalk for the Scaffolding of Balanced Conversations in Groups of Children

  • Alessandra Melonio
  • Mehdi RizviEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10108)

Abstract

The proper management of conversation among children is pivotal for any group activity with them. Socio-emotional learning curricula developed experimented activities for teaching children conversation skills, which can be enhanced by tangible interactive playful solutions for conveying conversation rules. This paper moves along such lines and presents the design and current evaluation of a tangible interactive playful object for children: TurnTalk. Enhanced with “calm technology”, TurnTalk promotes the scaffolding of a balanced conversation in group, in terms of turns taken in talking. The paper overviews its design rationale, choices and current evaluation results.

Keywords

Playful experience design Socio-emotional learning Group dynamics Children Deaf 

References

  1. 1.
    Alrifai, M., Gennari, R., Tifrea, O., Vittorini, P.: The user and domain models of the terence adaptive learning system. In: Vittorini, P., Gennari, R., Marenzi, I., de la Prieta, F., Rodríguez, J. (eds.) International Workshop on Evidence-Based Technology Enhanced Learning. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol. 152, pp. 83–90. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Bachour, K., Kaplan, F., Dillenbourg, P.: An interactive table for supporting participation balance in face-to-face collaborative learning. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 3(3), 203–213 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collazos, C.A., Guerrero, L.A., Pino, J.A., Ochoa, S.F.: A method for evaluating computer-supported collaborative learning processes. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. 19(3/4), 151–161 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2004.004044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Marsico, M., Sterbini, A., Temperini, M.: Assessing group composition in e-learning according to Vygotskij’s zone of proximal development. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8514, pp. 277–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07440-5_26 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DiMicco, J.M., Hollenbach, K.J., Pandolfo, A., Bender, W.: The impact of increased awareness while face-to-face. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 22(1), 47–96 (2007). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1466595.1466598 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dodero, G., Gennari, R., Melonio, A., Torello, S.: Towards tangible gamified codesign at school: two studies in primary schools. In: Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, CHI PLAY 2014. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dourish, P.: Embodied Interaction: Exploring the Foundations of a New Approach to HCI (1999). http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jpd/publications/misc/embodied.pdf
  9. 9.
    Durlak, J.A., Weissberg, R.P., Dymnicki, A.B., Taylor, R.D., Schellinger, K.B.: The impact of enhancing student’s social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Dev. 82(1), 405–432 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferrara, J.: Playful Design. Rosenfeld Media, Brooklyn (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gennari, R., Mich, O.: Constraint-based temporal reasoning for e-learning with LODE. In: Bessière, C. (ed.) CP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4741, pp. 90–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74970-7_9. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1771668.1771679
  12. 12.
    Gennari, R., Melonio, A., Torello, S.: Gamified probes for cooperative learning: a case study. Multimed. Tools Appl. 75, 1–25 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3543-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gothelf, J.: Lean UX. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Graves, T.: The Controversy over group rewards in cooperative classrooms. Educ. Leadersh. 48(7), 77–79 (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hong, H., Kim, J.G., Abowd, G.D., Arriaga, R.I.: Designing a social network to support the independence of young adults with autism. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW 2012, pp. 627–636. ACM, New York (2012). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2145204.2145300
  16. 16.
    Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B.B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., Eiderbäck, B.: Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2003, pp. 17–24. ACM, New York (2003). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/642611.642616
  17. 17.
    Jain, D., Findlater, L., Gilkeson, J., Holland, B., Duraiswami, R., Zotkin, D., Vogler, C., Froehlich, J.E.: Head-mounted display visualizations to support sound awareness for the deaf and hard of hearing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2015, pp. 241–250. ACM, New York (2015). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702123.2702393
  18. 18.
    Knoors, H., Marschark, M.: Teaching Deaf Learners: Psychological and Developmental Foundations. Oxford University, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leonardi, C., Pianesi, F., Tomasini, D., Zancanaro, M.: The collaborative workspace: a co-located tabletop device to support meetings. In: Waible, A., Stiefelhagen, R. (eds.) Computers in the Human Interaction Loop, pp. 187–205. Springer, London (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-1-84882-054-8_17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Levin Gelman, D.: Design for Kids. Rosenfeld Media, Brooklyn (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    van der Meijden, H., Veenman, S.: Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in a primary school setting. Comput. Hum. Behav. 21(5), 831–859 (2005). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563203000761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Olguin, D.O., Waber, B.N., Kim, T., Mohan, A., Ara, K., Pentland, A.: Sensible organizations: technology and methodology for automatically measuring organizational behavior. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 39(1), 43–55 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shaw, F.W., Klavins, E.: Grouper: a proof-of-concept wearable wireless group coordinator. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference Adjunct Papers on Ubiquitous Computing-Adjunct, pp. 379–380. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Slovák, P., Fitzpatrick, G.: Teaching and developing social and emotional skills with technology. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22(4), 19:1–19:34 (2015). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2744195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weiser, M.: Creating the invisible interface: (invited talk). In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST 1994, p. 1. ACM, New York (1994). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/192426.192428
  26. 26.
    Wiemann, J.M., Knapp, M.L.: Turn-taking in conversations. J. Commun. 25(2), 75–92 (1975). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1975.tb00582.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Free University of Bozen-BolzanoBolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations