Abstract
Multiple criteria decision analysis is devoted to the development of decision support tools to address complex decisions, especially where other methods fail to consider more than one outcome of interest. The approach is very flexible as outcomes can be quantifiable in non-monetary terms and be expressed in ordinal or numerical terms (Sect. 11.1). Basically speaking, it starts with the construction of a value tree and the identification of relevant criteria (Sect. 11.2). The approach then proceeds with gathering information about the performance of each assessed alternative against the whole set of criteria. Values are generally normalized from 0 to 1, thereby constituting what is termed a score matrix (Sect. 11.3). Numerical weights are also assigned to criteria to better reflect their relative importance (Sect. 11.4). Weights and scores are then combined to arrive at a ranking or sorting of alternatives. Should a compensatory analysis be implemented, the approach would rely on aggregation methods to build a composite indicator (Sect. 11.5). Should a non-compensatory analysis be carried out, the approach would instead examine each dimension individually (Sect. 11.6). Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis of the weights and scores can be used to explore how changes in assumptions influence the results (Sect. 11.7).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beinat, E. (1997). Value functions for environmental management. Berlin: Springer.
Beroggi, G. (1991). Decision modeling in policy management: An introduction to the analytic concepts. Heidelberg: Springer.
de Borda, J. C. (1784). MĆ©moire sur les Elections au Scrutin. In Histoire de LāAcademie Royale des Sciences.
de Condorcet, M. (1785). Essai sur lāapplication de lāanalyse Ć la probabilitĆ© des dĆ©cisions rendues Ć la probabilitĆ© des voix. Paris: De lāimprimerie royale.
Department for Communities and Local Government. (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: A manual.
French, S., Maule, J., & Papamichail, N. (2009). Decision behaviour, analysis and support. University of Manchester, Cambridge University Press.
Hobbs, B. F., & Meier, P. (2000). Energy decisions and the environment: A guide to the use of multicriteria methods. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science.
Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis: Methods and software. New York: Wiley.
Melese, F., Richter A. and Solomon B. (2015). Military cost-benefit analysis: Theory and practice. In Studies in defence and peace economics. Routledge.
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building. Prepared for the EU Commission.
New South Wales Government. (2013). Principles and guidelines for economic appraisal of transport investment and initiatives.
OECD. (2008). The handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide.
Pomerol, J.-C., & Barba-Romero, S. (2000). Multicriterion decision in management principles and practice. Heidelberg: Springer.
Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en prĆ©sence de points de vue multiples (la mĆ©thode Electre). Revue franƧaise dāautomatique, dāinformatique et de recherche opĆ©rationnelle 8.
Roy, B., & Berthier, P. (1973). La mƩthode ELECRE II. Rapport technique. Note de travail, l42. METRA, Direction Scientifique.
Roy, B., & Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritĆØre Ć la dĆ©cision: mĆ©thodes et cas. Paris: Ćconomica.
Roy, B., & Hugonnard, J. C. (1982). Ranking of suburban line extension projects on the Paris Metro System by a multicriteria method. Transportation Research A16.
Saaty, T. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process. New York: Wiley.
Thokala, P., Devlin, N., Marsh, K., Baltussen, R., Boysen, M., Kalo, Z., et al. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision makingāAn introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force. Value in Health, 19, 1ā13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Josselin, JM., Le Maux, B. (2017). Multi-criteria Decision Analysis. In: Statistical Tools for Program Evaluation . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52827-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52827-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52826-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52827-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)