Skip to main content

Multi-criteria Decision Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistical Tools for Program Evaluation

Abstract

Multiple criteria decision analysis is devoted to the development of decision support tools to address complex decisions, especially where other methods fail to consider more than one outcome of interest. The approach is very flexible as outcomes can be quantifiable in non-monetary terms and be expressed in ordinal or numerical terms (Sect. 11.1). Basically speaking, it starts with the construction of a value tree and the identification of relevant criteria (Sect. 11.2). The approach then proceeds with gathering information about the performance of each assessed alternative against the whole set of criteria. Values are generally normalized from 0 to 1, thereby constituting what is termed a score matrix (Sect. 11.3). Numerical weights are also assigned to criteria to better reflect their relative importance (Sect. 11.4). Weights and scores are then combined to arrive at a ranking or sorting of alternatives. Should a compensatory analysis be implemented, the approach would rely on aggregation methods to build a composite indicator (Sect. 11.5). Should a non-compensatory analysis be carried out, the approach would instead examine each dimension individually (Sect. 11.6). Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis of the weights and scores can be used to explore how changes in assumptions influence the results (Sect. 11.7).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beinat, E. (1997). Value functions for environmental management. Berlin: Springer.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Beroggi, G. (1991). Decision modeling in policy management: An introduction to the analytic concepts. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • de Borda, J. C. (1784). MĆ©moire sur les Elections au Scrutin. In Histoire de Lā€™Academie Royale des Sciences.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • de Condorcet, M. (1785). Essai sur lā€™application de lā€™analyse Ć  la probabilitĆ© des dĆ©cisions rendues Ć  la probabilitĆ© des voix. Paris: De lā€™imprimerie royale.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government. (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: A manual.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • French, S., Maule, J., & Papamichail, N. (2009). Decision behaviour, analysis and support. University of Manchester, Cambridge University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hobbs, B. F., & Meier, P. (2000). Energy decisions and the environment: A guide to the use of multicriteria methods. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis: Methods and software. New York: Wiley.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Melese, F., Richter A. and Solomon B. (2015). Military cost-benefit analysis: Theory and practice. In Studies in defence and peace economics. Routledge.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building. Prepared for the EU Commission.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • New South Wales Government. (2013). Principles and guidelines for economic appraisal of transport investment and initiatives.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • OECD. (2008). The handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Pomerol, J.-C., & Barba-Romero, S. (2000). Multicriterion decision in management principles and practice. Heidelberg: Springer.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en prĆ©sence de points de vue multiples (la mĆ©thode Electre). Revue franƧaise dā€™automatique, dā€˜informatique et de recherche opĆ©rationnelle 8.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Roy, B., & Berthier, P. (1973). La mĆ©thode ELECRE II. Rapport technique. Note de travail, l42. METRA, Direction Scientifique.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Roy, B., & Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritĆØre Ć  la dĆ©cision: mĆ©thodes et cas. Paris: Ɖconomica.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Roy, B., & Hugonnard, J. C. (1982). Ranking of suburban line extension projects on the Paris Metro System by a multicriteria method. Transportation Research A16.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Saaty, T. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process. New York: Wiley.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Thokala, P., Devlin, N., Marsh, K., Baltussen, R., Boysen, M., Kalo, Z., et al. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision makingā€”An introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force. Value in Health, 19, 1ā€“13.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Josselin, JM., Le Maux, B. (2017). Multi-criteria Decision Analysis. In: Statistical Tools for Program Evaluation . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52827-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics