Skip to main content

Integrating Science and Society for Environmental Realism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Environmental Realism

Abstract

Recent developments spanning numerous fields—including ecology, evolutionary science, psychology, sustainability, technology studies, and economics—further demonstrate the problematic nature of a solutionist paradigm and offer compelling evidence of ways forward that accept the deep interconnections between human and biophysical systems. However, consistent with the book’s driving premise that environmental realism with its inherent complexity must be acknowledged, there is no singular conclusion to this work. Although the developments discussed offer reason for optimism, they also highlight the continual effort that will be required at multiple organizational levels to shape a positive trajectory for humanity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Agee, JK (1999) Science review. In: KN Johnson, F Swanson, M Herring and S Greene (eds.), Bioregional assessments: Science at the crossroads of management and policy. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 288–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcott, B (2005) Jevons’ paradox. Ecological Economics 54(1): 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balter, M (2013) Strongest evidence of animal culture seen in monkeys and whales. Science 25 April. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/04/strongest-evidence-animal-culture-seen-monkeys-and-whales.

  • Beck, U (2006) Living in the world risk society. Economy and Society 35: 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff, M (2013) Do animals know who they are?. LiveScience, 19 September. Available at: http://www.livescience.com/39803-do-animals-know-who-they-are.html.

  • Berkes, F, Colding, J and Folke, C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10(5): 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronowski, J (1956) Science and human values. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, JR, Allen, CD, Brown, JH, Burnside, WR, Davidson, AD, Fristoe, TS, Hamilton, MJ, Mercado-Silva, N, Nekola, JC, Okie, JG and Zuo, W (2012) The macroecology of sustainability. PLoS Biology 10(6): 10:e1001345. doi: 10.1371/journalpbio1001345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, O, DeLong, JP and Hamilton, MJ (2011) Industrial energy use and the human life history scientific reports. Available at: http://wwwnaturecomezproxy1libasuedu/srep/2011/110805/srep00056/full/srep00056html?message-global=remove&WTmc_id=FBK_SciReports.

  • Chiao, JY and Blizinsky, KD (2010) Culture–gene coevolution of individualism–collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 277(1681): 529–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, CJMvd and Gowdy, JM (2009) A group selection perspective on economic behavior, institutions and organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 72: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, RN, Stankey, GH, Brown, PJ, Burchfield, JA, Haynes, RW and McCool, SF (1999) Toward an ecological approach: Integrating social, economic, cultural, biological and physical considerations. In: NC Johnson, AJ Malk, WT Sexton and R Szaro (eds.), Ecological Stewardship: A common reference for ecosystem management. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, pp. 297–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, MN and Gmm, C-K (2007) Ancient health: Skeletal indicators of agricultural and economic intensification. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbeck, R and Renner, R (2012) Free randomness can be amplified. Nature Physics 8(6): 450–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danchin, É and Wagner, RH (2010) Inclusive heritability: Combining genetic and non‐genetic information to study animal behavior and culture. Oikos 119(2): 210–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C (1859) The origin of species by means of natural selection. London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defries, R (2014) The big ratchet. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, JP, Burger, O and Hamilton, MJ (2010) Current demographics suggest future energy supplies will be inadequate to slow human population growth. PLoS One 5: e13206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, PR (2009) Cultural evolution and the human predicament. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24(8): 409–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, PR (2010) The MAHB, the culture gap, and some really inconvenient truths. PLoS Biology 8(4): e1000330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, PR and Ehrlich, AH (2013) Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 280(1754): 20122845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, GJ (2006) The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, SD and Edwards, LE (2016) The “Anthropocene” epoch: Scientific decisions or political statement?. GSA Today 26(3–4): 4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, R (2010) Seeking resiliency in the development of sustainable communities. Research in Human Ecology 17(1): 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M (2007) Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College De France, 1977–78. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, DM (1995 [1963]) Engines of culture: Philanthropy and art Museums. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, J, Rissel, C and Bauman, A (2012) Health benefits of cycling. In: J Pucher and R Buehler (eds.) City cycling. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, TJ (2013) Thermodynamics of long-run economic innovation and growth arXiv Preprint arXiv: 13063554. Available at: http://arxivorgezproxy1libasuedu/abs/13063554.

  • Garrett, TJ (2014) Long-run evolution of the global economy: 1 physical basis. Earth’s Future 2(3): 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, CM and Perez-Blanco, CD (2014) Simple myths and basic Maths about greening irrigation. Water Resources Management 28(12): 4035–4044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J and Krall, L (2013) The ultrasocial origin of the anthropocene. Ecological Economics 95: 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graedel, TE, Harper, EM, Nassar, NT and Reck, BK (2015) On the materials basis of modern society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(20): 6295–6300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V, Cantú, SM and Vugt, MV (2012) The evolutionary bases for sustainable behavior: Implications for marketing, policy, and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 31(1): 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, MJ, Burger, O and Walker, RS (2012) Human ecology. In: RM Sibly, JH Brown and A Kodric-Brown (eds.), Metabolic ecology: A scaling approach. Oxford: Wiley & Sons, pp. 248–257.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossay, P (2006) Unsustainable: A Primer for global environmental and social justice. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huaman, ES (2015) Indigenous-innovation in shifting ecologies. In: ES Huaman and B Sriraman (eds.), Indigenous innovation: universalities and peculiarities. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 1–10.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huesemann, M and Huesemann, J (2011) Techno-fix: Why technology won’t save us or the environment. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, pp. 435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentsch, A, Kreyling, J and Beierkuhnlein, C (2007) A new generation of climate change experiments: Events, not trends. Frontiers in Ecology 5(6): 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, WS (1865) The coal question: An inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, BL (1999) Adaptive management—scientifically sound, socially challenged?. Conservation Ecology and Society 3: 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jumonville, N (2002) The cultural politics of the sociobiology debate. Journal of the History of Biology 35(3): 569–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig, AP, Ehrlich, PR, Alston, LJ, Arrow, K, Barrett, S, Buchman, TG and Oppenheimer, M (2013) Social norms and global environmental challenges: The complex interaction of behaviors, values, and policy. BioScience 63(3): 164–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudato si (2015) Available at: http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html.

  • Lee, WY, Han, YD, Lee, S, Jablonski, PG, Jung, JW and Kim, JH (2016) Antarctic Skuas recognize individual humans. Animal Cognition 19(4): 861–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, HM, Rogers, KH and Roux, DJ (2003) Implementing the South African water policy: Holding the vision while exploring an uncharted mountain. Water SA 29(4): 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R (2004) Against the grain: How agriculture has Hijacked civilization. Berkeley: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, JL, Maris, V and Simberloff, DS (2016) The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(22): 6105–6112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, JM, Miyaoka, R, Minoshima, S and Cross, DJ (2012) Brain imaging reveals neuronal circuitry underlying the crow’s perception of human faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(39): 15912–15917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell M. (1991) Moral inertia: Ideas for social action. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGurty, E (1997) From NIMBY to civil rights: The origins of the environmental justice movement. Environmental History 2(3): 301–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLain, RJ and Lee, RG (1996) Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management 20(4): 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A, Whiten, A and Laland, KN (2006) Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29(4): 329–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A (1999) Environmental problem solving: Psychosocial barriers to adaptive change. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C and Richter, J (2014) Social planning for energy transitions. Current Sustainable Renewable Energy Reports, doi: 10.1007/s40518-014-0010-9.

  • Miller, TR, Wiek, A, Robinson, J, Olsson, L, Kriebel, D and Loorbach, D (2014) The future of sustainability science: A solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustainability Science 9(2): 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, E (2013) To save everything, click here. New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, ME and Brown, JH (2003) Allometry of human fertility and energy use. Ecology Letters 6(4): 295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud, I and Penn, DJ (2007) Integrating the biological and social sciences to address environmental problems. In: DJ Penn and I Mysterud (eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on environmental problems. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction, pp. 281–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature (2011) Editorial: The human epoch. Nature 473: 254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekola, JC, Allen, CD, Brown, JH, Burger, JR, Davidson, AD, Fristoe, TS, Hamilton, MJ, Hammond, ST, Kodric-Brown, A, Mercado-Silva, N and Okie, JG (2013a) The Malthusian-Darwinian dynamic and the trajectory of civilization. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28(3): 127–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekola, JC, Brown, JH, Kodric-Brown, A and Okie, JG (2013b) Global sustainability versus the Malthusian-Darwinian dynamic: A response to Rull. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314(5805): 1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polimeni, JM (2012) The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements. New York: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polimeni, JM and Polimeni, RI (2006) Jevons’ paradox and the myth of technological liberation. Ecological Complexity 3(4): 344–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidy, C (2013) Climate change is a super wicked problem. PlanetCentric, 29 May. Available at: https://chrisriedy.me/2013/05/29/climate-change-is-a-super-wicked-problem/.

  • Revkin, A (2011) Conveying the climate story. Google Science Communication Fellows Workshop, 13 June. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lU_4OR3hOyo.

  • Rockström, J, Steffen, W, Noone, K, Persson, Å, Chapin, FS, Lambin, EF and Schellnhuber, HJ (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263): 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryabov, VA (2016) A study of acoustic signals and the supposed spoken language of the dolphins. St. Petersburg Polytechnical University Journal: Physics and Mathematics 000: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, HD (1992) The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. The Energy Journal 13(4): 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelhas, J, Buck, LE and Geisler, CC (2001) Introduction: The challenge of adaptive collaborative management. In: LE Buck, CC Geisler, J Schelhas and E Wollenberg (eds.), Biological diversity: Balancing interests through adaptive collaborative management. New York: CRC Press, pp. xix–xxxv.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D (2007) Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements and nature. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenemann, PT (2006) Evolution of the size and functional areas of the human brain. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 379–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schramski, JR, Gattie, DK and Brown, JH (2015) Human domination of the biosphere: Rapid discharge of the earth-space battery foretells the future of humankind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(31): 9511–9517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, CC, Subiaul, F and Zawidzki, TW (2008) A natural history of the human mind: Tracing evolutionary changes in brain and cognition. Journal of Anatomy 212(4): 426–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobodchikoff, CN, Briggs, W and Dennis, PA (2009) Decoding the information contained in the alarm calls of Gunnison prairie dogs. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(4): 2739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S (2010) Water: The epic struggle for wealth, power, and civilization. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell, S (2009) Jevons’ paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy 37(4): 1456–1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G, Clark, RN and Bormann, BT (2005) Adaptive management of natural resources: Theory, concepts and management institutions. Portland: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G, Clark, RN and Bormann, BT (eds.) (2006) Learning to manage a complex ecosystem: Adaptive management and the Northwest forest plan. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-567. Portland: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W, Crutzen, PJ and McNeill, JR (2007) The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature?. Ambio 36(8): 614–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L, Camacho, AE and Schenk, T (2012) A critical assessment of collaborative adaptive management in practice. Journal of Applied Ecology 49: 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svozil, K (1993) Randomness & undecidability in physics. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J (1990) The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1987) Our common future—Brundtland report. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Millennium Project (2002). Millennium project: Goals, targets and indicators. Accessed 9 September 2015. Available at: http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/goals/gti.htm.

  • Van Cleve, FB, Simenstad, C, Goetz, F and Mumford, T (2004) Application of the “best available science” in ecosystem restoration: Lessons learned from large-scale restoration project efforts in the USA. Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership Report No. 2004–2001. Seattle: Washington Sea Grant Program. Available at: http://pugetsoundnearshore.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vugt, M, Griskevicius, V and Schultz, P (2014) Naturally green: Harnessing stone age psychological biases to foster environmental behavior. Social Issues and Policy Review 8(1): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, MJC, Gibbard, PL and Lowe, J (2015) Comment on “When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary is stratigraphically optimal”. by Jan Zalasiewicz et al. (2015). Quaternary International 383: 204–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, B (2015) Obama takes the lead on climate change but needs the world to follow. Time 186(6): 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. London: MacMillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, FA and Pulido-Velazquez, M (2008) Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(47): 18215–18220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, TM (2010) New evolutionary foundations: Theoretical requirements for a science of sustainability. Ecological Economics 69(4): 718–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, TM, Kline, MA, Brooks, JS, Goff, SH, Gowdy, J, Janssen, MA and Jacquet, J (2015) A multilevel evolutionary framework for sustainability analysis. Ecology and Society 20(2): 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, C (1984) The other transition: From the ancient world to feudalism. Past & Present 103(May): 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, EO (2000) Sociobiology: The new synthesis, 25th anniversary edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S (2002) A new kind of science (vol 5). Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster, D (1994) Nature and the disorder of history. Environmental History Review 18(2): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, R (2006) Ecological paradoxes: William Stanley Jevons and the paperless office. Human Ecology Review 13(2): 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, JT (1980) The evolution of culture in animals. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrero, S, Escobar, AB, Cortés, AM and Maya, LC (2013) Poor and distressed, but happy: Situational and cultural moderators of the relationship between wealth and happiness. Estudios Gerenciales 29(126): 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R and Richerson, PJ (1988) Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calcott, B and Sterelny, K (2011) The major transitions in evolution revisited. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, MW and Laland, KN (1996) Gene-culture coevolutionary theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11(11): 453–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillen-Royo, M and Kasser, T (2015) Personal goals, socio-economic context and happiness: Studying a diverse sample in Peru. Journal of Happiness Studies 16(2): 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushlev, K, Dunn, EW and Lucas, RE (2015) Higher income is associated with less daily sadness but not more daily happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science 6(5): 483–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michod, RE (2000) Darwinian dynamics: Evolutionary transitions in fitness and individuality. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S and Kesebir, S (2015) Income inequality explains why economic growth does not always translate to an increase in happiness. Psychological Science 26(10): 1630–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, M (2010) A right to reproduce? Bioethics 24(8): 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P (2010) Warfare and the evolution of social complexity: A multilevel-selection approach. Structure and Dynamics 4(3): online.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cockerill, K., Armstrong, M., Richter, J., Okie, J.G. (2017). Integrating Science and Society for Environmental Realism. In: Environmental Realism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52824-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52824-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52823-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52824-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics