Skip to main content

Political Economy and Its Public Contenders 1820–1850

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 439 Accesses

Part of the book series: Ethical Economy ((SEEP,volume 54))

Abstract

In the early nineteenth century it was not at all evident what kind of a science, if at all, political economy was supposed to be. Writers of the discipline attempted to establish themselves as members of a scientific field, while being attacked by socialist and working-class opponents for being capitalist interest disguised as science. Drawing on material from the working-class periodical literature and private correspondences of the political economists in Britain and France, this chapter explores the struggle over the scientific status of the political economists in the 1820s to 1840s. By comparing the debates across the Channel the chapter shows both the national differences and the border-crossing inspirations for the political economists and the socialist movements alike. The chapter argues that the struggle over the status of political economy in this period needs to be understood as a struggle between competing economic rationalities. This struggle was instrumental in the lasting theoretical cooperation between French and British liberal economic thinkers, who aimed at placing the principles of unhindered trade at the basis of any acceptable economic policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Augello, M.M., and M.E. Guidi. 2001. The Spread of Political Economy and the Professionalisation of Economists: Economic Societies in Europe, America and Japan in the Nineteenth Century. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B., and S. Shapin. 1977. Science, Nature and Control: Interpreting Mechanics’ Institutetes. Social Studies in Science 7(1): 31–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastiat, Frédéric. 1849. Disarmament and Taxes. In French Liberalism in the 19th Century, eds. Robert Leroux and, David Hart, 2012. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, Yves. 1985. Les économistes, le pouvoir politique et l’ordre social en France en 1830 et 1851. Histoire, économie et société 4(2): 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, William. 1832. Proceedings of the Third Co-operative Congress: Held in London, and Composed of Delegates of Co-Operative Societies of Great Britain and Ireland. London: William Strange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, M. 1844. Annuaire de l’économie politique pour 1844, 1re année: agriculture, industrie, commerce. Paris: Guillaumin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobbett, William. 1830. Rural Rides. London: Cobbett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, Adrian. 1989. The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, D. 2004. Tories and Markets: Britain 1800–1850. In Markets in Historical Contexts: Ideas and Politics in the Modern World, ed. M. Bevir and F. Trentmann. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, Friedrich. 2012 [1888]. Preface to the English Edition. In The Communist Manifesto: A Modern Edition, ed. K. Marx and F. Engels. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, Ann. 2005. Culture and Wealth Creation: Mechanics’ Institutes and the Emergence of Political Economy in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain. History of Intellectual Culture 5(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frobert, L. 2010. L’Écho de la fabrique naissance de la presse ouvrière à Lyon, 1831–1834. Lyon: ENS Éd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frobert, L. et al. ed. 2016. Echo de la fabrique. http://echo-fabrique.ens-lyon.fr/. Accessed 25 Nov 2016.

  • Garnier, J. 1843. Ouverture du Cours d’économie politique à l’Athénée royal, juin 1843. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review 48(6): 781–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Peirs J. 2014. Political Descent: Malthus, Mutualism, and the Politics of Evolution in Victorian England. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, J. 2001. John Stuart Mill on Liberty and Control. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgskin, Thomas. 1827. Popular Political Economy. Four Lectures Delivered at the London Mechanics Institution. London: Charles and William Tait.

    Google Scholar 

  • Host, John. 1998. Victorian Labour History: Experience, Identity and the Politics of Representation. London: Routhledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huzel, James P. 2006. The Popularization of Malthus in Early Nineteenth-Centry England: Martineau, Cobbett and the Pauper Press. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, John Ramsay. 2004. McCulloch to Ricardo, Edinburg 5. June 1821. In The Works and Corresponces of David Ricardo, ed. P. Sraffa, Vol. 8, 381–386. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, James. 1836, January. Whether Political Economy is Useful?. Westminster Review 2(4): 553–571. London: J. Macrone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinari, Gustave 1849. The private production of Security In French Liberalism in the 19th Century, eds. Leroux, Robert and David Hart. 2012. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, J., and A. Thackray. 1981. Gentlemen of Science: British Association for the Advancement of Science. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. 2008. Science and Scientism in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R., and R.D. Owen, ed. 1832. The Crisis, Or The Change from Error and Misery to Truth and Happiness. Vol. 1. London: J. Eamonson.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEC, Political Economy Club. 1860. Political Economy Club, Founded in London, 1821. Names of Members 1821–1860: – Rules of the Club: – and List of Questions Discussed 1833–1860. London: Printed for the Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, J.D. 2002. Press, Revolution, and Social Identities in France, 1830–1835. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prothero, I.J. 2006. Radical Artisans in England and France, 1830–1870. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman, Deborah A. 1997. The Rise of Political Economy as a Science: Methodology and the Classical Economists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, David. 2004a. Ricardo to Say, 8 May 1821. In The Works and Correspondences of David Ricardo, ed. P. Sraffa, Vol. 8, 379–381. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004b. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, 3rd Edition. In The Works and Correspondences of David Ricardo, Vol. 1, ed. Sraffa, P. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004c. Ricardo to McCulloch, London 18. June 1821. In The Works and Correspondences of David Ricardo, ed. P. Sraffa, Vol. 1, 386–391. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. 1989. Ridardo Was Right! The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 91(1): 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Say, Jean-Baptiste. 1834. A Treatise on Political Economy, Or, The Production, Distribution, and Consumption of Wealth. Philadelphia: Grigg & Elliot.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Say to Ricardo, 19 July 1821. In The Works and Correspondences of David Ricardo, ed. P. Sraffa, Vol. 1, 31–36. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, Anne. 1994. Science in the Pub: Artisan Botanists in Early Nineteenth-century Lancashire. History of Science 32(3): 269–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, G. 1979. The Political Economy of Artisan Industry: Government and the People in the Silk Trade of Lyon, 1830–1870. French Historical Studies 11(2): 215–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigot, Nathalie. 2010. Utility and Justice: French Liberal Economists in the 19th Century. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17: 759–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapelbroek, Koen, and Jani Marjanen. 2012. The Rise of Economic Societies in the Eighteenth Century: Patriotic Reform in Europe and North America. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thackray, Arnold. 1974. Natural Knowledge in Cultural Context: The Manchester Mode. The American Historical Review 79(3): 672–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Poor Man’s Guardian Vol. 2 (1832). London: Henry Hetherington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Noel W. 1984. The People’s Science: The Popular Political Economy of Exploitation and Crisis 1816–1834. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Gaarsmand Jacobsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacobsen, S.G., Johansen, T.P. (2017). Political Economy and Its Public Contenders 1820–1850. In: Bek-Thomsen, J., Christiansen, C., Gaarsmand Jacobsen, S., Thorup, M. (eds) History of Economic Rationalities. Ethical Economy, vol 54. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52815-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics