Abstract
This chapter demonstrates the way in which an economic rationality of state support for the arts was developed in the 1970s and 1980s by analyzing three crucial debates between economists of the arts and others. The chapter demonstrates that the economists of the arts sought to provide a more solid foundation for specific state policies directed at the arts. But in the process of doing so they narrowed the grounds on which such support could be justified, and they had to sidestep the most crucial issues: what is excellence in the arts, and what is the moral status of consumer preferences in the case of the arts? Those critical of this economic rationality, and the economic approach to the arts more generally, argued for the fundamental difference between politics and the market, and individual preferences and social values. Overall the debates were characterized by mutual misunderstanding. The exception was the debate over the “merit good,” but it ultimately was an unsatisfactory argument for both sides. The economists were not convinced that it was really an economic argument, and the critics felt that the merit good did not capture the special role of the arts in a liberal society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Two publications stand out: the special issue of the Journal of Economic Behavior, summer 1977 and the edited volume by Hendon, Shanahan and MacDonald ‘Economic Policy for the Arts’ (1980).
- 2.
The emphasis on personal preferences can also be found in Blaug’s introduction (1976) to the economics of the arts and in the work of prominent economist of the art Alan Peacock, see below.
- 3.
In recent years economists of the arts have become more appreciative of such values, they now recognize non-use values such as option, existence and bequest values (Frey 2003).
- 4.
For an early exception Scitovsky (1972)
Bibliography
Austen-Smith, David. 1980. On Justifying Subsidies to the Performing Arts. In Economic Policy for the Arts, ed. William S. Hendon, James L. Shanahan, and Alice J. MacDonald, 24–31. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
Baumol, William J., and W.G. Bowen. 1966. Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
Belfiore, E. 2004. Auditing Culture. International Journal of Cultural Policy 10: 183–202.
Blake, Andrew. 1997. The Land Without Music. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Blaug, Mark. 1976. Introduction: What is the Economics of the Arts About. In The Economics of the Arts, 13–22. London: Martin Robertson.
———. 1983. Justifications for Subsidies to the Arts: A Reply to F.F. Ridley. Journal of Cultural Economics 7: 19–22.
———. 1992. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2001. Where are we Now on Cultural Economics? Journal of Economic Surveys 15: 123–143.
Cwi, David. 1980. Public Support of the Arts: Three Arguments Examined. Journal of Cultural Economics 4: 39–68.
Findlater, Richard. 1973/1976. The Arts Council and its Critics. In The Economics of the Arts, ed. Mark Blaug, 126–129. London: Martin Robertson.
Frey, Bruno S. 2003. Arts & Economics: Analysis and Cultural Policy. Berlin: Springer.
Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1963/2001. Economics and the Quality of Life. In The Essential Galbraith, ed. Andrea D. Williams, 90–108. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hendon, William S., James L. Shanahan, and Alice J. MacDonald. 1980a. Preface. In Economic Policy for the Arts, ed. William S. Hendon, James L. Shanahan, and Alice J. MacDonald, ix–xiii. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
———. 1980b. Introduction to Public Support for the Arts. In Economic Policy for the Arts, ed. William S. Hendon, James L. Shanahan, and Alice J. MacDonald, 21–23. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
King, Karen, and Mark Blaug. 1973/1976a. Does the Arts Council Know What it is Doing. In The Economics of the Arts, ed. Mark Blaug, 101–125. London: Martin Robertson.
———. 1973/1976b. A Reply. In The Economics of the Arts, ed. Mark Blaug, 127–129. London: Martin Robertson.
Peacock, Alan T. 1969/1994. Welfare Economics and Public Subsidies to the Arts. Journal of Cultural Economics 18: 151–161.
Ridley, F.F. 1983. Cultural Economists and the Culture of Economists. Journal of Cultural Economics 7: 1–18.
Robbins, Lionel R. 1958/1963. Art and the State. In Politics and Economics: Papers in Political Economy, ed. Lord Robbins, 53–72. London: Macmillan and Co..
Scitovsky, Tibor. 1972. What’s Wrong with the Arts is What’s Wrong with Society. The American Economic Review 62: 62–69.
Towse, Ruth. 2003. Introduction. In Handbook of Cultural Economics, ed. Ruth Towse, 1–14. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Towse, R. 2005. Alan Peacock and Cultural Economics. The Economic Journal 115: F262–F276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dekker, E. (2017). The Economic De-Legitimization and Legitimization of Arts Policies 1970–1985. In: Bek-Thomsen, J., Christiansen, C., Gaarsmand Jacobsen, S., Thorup, M. (eds) History of Economic Rationalities. Ethical Economy, vol 54. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52815-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52815-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52814-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52815-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)