Skip to main content

Development of Classification Charts for Q Index of Shale from the Parameters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Laboratory Testing and Modelling of Soils and Shales (ATMSS) (ATMSS 2017)

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering ((SSGG))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Construction of tunnels, slopes, deep basements, foundations and retaining walls are common in shale. Quality of shale can be assessed based on the Q index system. This paper presents the analysis of charts developed for Q index of shale from three different parameters such as block size (RQD/Jn), inter-block shear strength (Jr/Ja) and active stress (Jw/SRF). For the range of values chosen for RQD/Jn, Jr/Ja and Jw/SRF a Q index was estimated and charts were established between Q index and RQD/Jn for various values of Jr/Ja and Jw/SRF. The charts presented in the paper for Q index can be used to classify the shale. Shale should have minimum Jr/Ja, Jw/SRF and RQD/Jn as 0.5, 0.2 and 10 respectively to be classified as good to very good category.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barton NR (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):185–216. doi:10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00011-4

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NR, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech Rock Eng 6(4):189–236. doi:10.1007/BF01239496 Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertuzzi R, Pells PJN (2002) Geotechnical parameters of Sydney stone and shale. Aust Geomech 37(5):41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonini M, Debernardi D, Barla M, Barla G (2009) The mechanical behaviour of clay shales and implications on the design of tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42:361. doi:10.1007/s00603-007-0147-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britt LK, Schoeffler J (2009) The geomechanics of a shale play: what makes a shale prospective. SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 9 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang C, Zoback MD, Khaksar A (2006) Empirical relations between rock strength and physical properties in sedimentary rocks. J Petrol Sci Eng 51:223–237. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Coveney RM (2003) Metalliferous paleozoic black shales and associated strata. In: Lenz DR (ed) Geochemistry of sediments and sedimentary rocks Geotext, vol 4. Geological Association of Canada, pp 135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Derek Martin C (2015) Behaviour of shales in underground environments. In: 13th ISRM international congress of rock mechanics, 10–13 May, Montreal. International Society for Rock Mechanics. ISBN 978-1-926872-25-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein HH (2000) Tunnels in Opalinus clay shale-a review of case histories and new developments. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 15(1):13–29. Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman W, Handley MF (2002) The application of the Q-tunneling quality index to rock mass assessment at Impala Platinum mine. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 102(3):155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Derakhshandeh M (1989) Monitoring of nondurable shale fills in semi – arid climates, Report No. CDOH-DTD-R-89-8, Colorado Department of Highways, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakoor A, Rodgers JP (1992) Predicting the rate of shale undercutting along highway cuts. Environ Eng Geosci. doi:10.2113/gseegeosci.xxix.1.61

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter MG (2001) Spent oil shale use in earthwork construction. Eng Geol 60(1–4):285–294. Special issue on geoenvironmental engineering

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nandyala Darga Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kumar, N.D., Singh, R.R., Ali, F., Efray’im (2017). Development of Classification Charts for Q Index of Shale from the Parameters. In: Ferrari, A., Laloui, L. (eds) Advances in Laboratory Testing and Modelling of Soils and Shales (ATMSS). ATMSS 2017. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52773-4_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52773-4_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52772-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52773-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics